Summary
Your bitcoins are safe if you received them in transactions confirmed before 2015-07-04 15:00 UTC.
However, there has been a problem with a planned upgrade. For bitcoins received later than the time above, confirmation scores are significantly less reliable then they usually are for users of certain software:
- Lightweight (SPV) wallet users should wait an additional 30 confirmations more than you would normally wait.
- Bitcoin Core 0.9.4 or earlier users should wait an additional 30 confirmations more than you would normally wait or upgrade to Bitcoin Core 0.10.2.
- Web wallet users should wait an additional 30 confirmations more than you would normally wait, unless you know for sure that your wallet is secured by Bitcoin Core 0.9.5 or later.
- Bitcoin Core 0.9.5 or later users are unaffected. (Note: upgrade to 0.10.2 is recommended due to denial-of-service vulnerabilities unrelated to this alert.)
[More after the break.]
The incident status page describes the cause of the problem:
For several months, an increasing amount of mining hash rate has been signaling its intent to begin enforcing BIP66 strict DER signatures. As part of the BIP66 rules, once 950 of the last 1,000 blocks were version 3 (v3) blocks, all upgraded miners would reject version 2 (v2) blocks.
Early morning UTC on 4 July 2015, the 950/1000 (95%) threshold was reached. Shortly thereafter, a small miner (part of the non-upgraded 5%) mined an invalid block--as was an expected occurrence. Unfortunately, it turned out that roughly half the network hash rate was mining without fully validating blocks (called SPV mining), and built new blocks on top of that invalid block.
It further describes the impact of this on Bitcoin users:
All software that assumes blocks are valid (because invalid blocks cost miners money) is at risk of showing transactions as confirmed when they really aren't. This particularly affects lightweight (SPV) wallets and software such as old versions of Bitcoin Core which have been downgraded to SPV-level security by the new BIP66 consensus rules
There has already been lost revenue as a result of this incident, with the status page stating "several large miners have lost over $50,000 dollars worth of mining income so far." The status page will be updated as this situation unfolds. There is currently a big red warning message at the top of their status page that prominently states: "many wallets currently vulnerable to double-spending of confirmed transactions."
[Update: corrected links to 0.10.2 - Ed.]
(Score: 5, Insightful) by zafiro17 on Sunday July 05 2015, @01:33PM
I fully expect to be modded into oblivion for this, but I'm a skeptic where it comes to bitcoin. I fully appreciate the desire to do away with nation states and their financial apparatus and usher in a new, nerd-revolution with its currency. But I am still not convinced it's not just a huge ponzi scheme.
That's too extreme a statement. What I mean is, Bitcoin is sure to have vulnerabilities and problems and flaws - this is clearly one of them - and I remain attentive, thinking it will some day collapse, taking with it a lot of nerd hopes and a fair chunk of their money.
Moderators - do your worst.
Dad always thought laughter was the best medicine, which I guess is why several of us died of tuberculosis - Jack Handey
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 05 2015, @05:38PM
no sir, it will not run the future economy.
but at the moment it IS the hit article in toys'r'us.