Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Community Reviews
posted by NCommander on Wednesday November 07 2018, @03:00PM   Printer-friendly [Skip to comment(s)]
from the maybe-we-can-buy-.soylentnews-gTLD dept.

Disclaimer: This post does not reflect the views or policies of SoylentNews Public Benefit Corporation (SN PBC), its staff, or my role as president. The opinions and statements within are my own, Michael Casadevall, and neither I nor SN PBC were financially compensated for this post.

There are times in life where you simply don't know where you will end up. For me, a chance encounter in Puerto Rico lead to a rather interesting series of events. I have spent the previous week (October 20th-26th) attending the ICANN 63rd International Public Meeting. For those who aren't familiar with the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), it is essentially the not-for-profit organization that administrates the Internet root zone which forms the linchpin of the modern internet, and allows domain names such as soylentnews.org to exist.

As a fellow, I have been working to help advance policy from the perspective of Internet end-users, as well as improving access to the Internet in the form of Internationalized Domain Names. For those less familiar with the technical underpinnings of the Internet, I'll also talk a bit about DNS, and more of the work I am currently in the process of handling at ICANN.

In This Issue

  • DNS - What is it?
  • The Internet Root Zone, Top Level Domains, and Second Level Domains
  • What Is ICANN?
  • The Fellowship Program
  • New Generic Top Level Domains
  • String Contention and Name Collisions
  • Internationalized Domain Names
  • In Closing
  • If You Want To Get Involved
  • Acknowledgements

Read more past the fold ...

DNS - What is it?

Before we can talk about ICANN in any fashion, we need to talk a bit about the Domain Name System, or DNS. Every computer on the internet is assigned one or more numbers known as IP addresses. IP addresses take the form of 23.239.29.31 or 2600:3c00::f03c:91ff:fe98:90b, and are used as ways of uniquely identifying every device. Every site and service has an IP address, as does your phone and computer to allow two way communication; they can be best thought of telephone numbers for computers.

Just like phone numbers, there needs to be a method to look up information based on name. In the days of old, we would use the Yellow Pages for this type of information. For computers, our version of the yellow pages is DNS, specifically what we call A and AAAA records. For example, here are two types of lookup requests for SoylentNews:

$ nslookup
> server 8.8.8.8
Default server: 8.8.8.8
Address: 8.8.8.8#53
> soylentnews.org
Server:		8.8.8.8
Address:	8.8.8.8#53

Non-authoritative answer:
Name:	soylentnews.org
Address: 23.239.29.31
Name:	soylentnews.org
Address: 2600:3c00::f03c:91ff:fe98:90b

Besides basic name lookup information, DNS often contains information such as mail routing in the form of MX records, or even user authentication data in the form of Hesiod TXT records. It would be fair to call DNS the worlds largest distributed dynamic database. At its core, DNS is comprised of a network of worldwide servers that provide name lookup services from the internet, starting from the root of a tree.

The Internet Root Zone, Top Level Domains, and Second Level Domains

When I said root of a tree, I wasn't being very metaphorical. Let's look a little closer at an actual domain name, and break it down into its component parts, in this case, our development site at dev.soylentnews.org. For the purposes of demonstration, we'll walk the domain from the top down. Each section of a domain name is divided into levels separated by a period. So dev is a third level domain, soylentnews is a second level domain, and org is a top level domain.

Likewise, each of these levels points to the one higher than it. Let's ask the soylentnews domain about dev; our hosting provider (and DNS servers) are hosted by Linode so we'll query them directly.

$ nslookup
> server ns1.linode.com
Default server: ns1.linode.com
Address: 2400:cb00:2049:1::a29f:1a63#53
Default server: ns1.linode.com
Address: 162.159.27.72#53
> dev.soylentnews.org
Server:		ns1.linode.com
Address:	2400:cb00:2049:1::a29f:1a63#53

Name:	dev.soylentnews.org
Address: 72.14.185.204
Name:	dev.soylentnews.org
Address: 2600:3c00::f03c:91ff:fe6e:d0a3

Notice that the "Non-authoritative answer" is missing. This is because soylentnews.org directly controls the level above it. We can see the same effect if we query the .org nameservers for SoylentNews; note that we need to ask for the NS record type which acts as a pointer to the next level of domain.

$ nslookup
> server a0.org.afilias-nst.info.
[...]
> set type=ns
> soylentnews.org
[...]
Authoritative answers can be found from:
soylentnews.org	nameserver = ns1.linode.com.
soylentnews.org	nameserver = ns3.linode.com.
soylentnews.org	nameserver = ns2.linode.com.
soylentnews.org	nameserver = ns4.linode.com.
soylentnews.org	nameserver = ns5.linode.com.

Cool! We can see the five nameservers that have authoritative data for soylentnews.org. But how did I find the nameserver for .org? Well, I queried the internet root zone for it.

nslookup
> server a.root-servers.net
Default server: a.root-servers.net
Address: 2001:503:ba3e::2:30#53
Default server: a.root-servers.net
Address: 198.41.0.4#53
> set type=ns
> org
Server:		a.root-servers.net
Address:	2001:503:ba3e::2:30#53

Non-authoritative answer:
*** Can't find org: No answer

Authoritative answers can be found from:
org	nameserver = a0.org.afilias-nst.info.
org	nameserver = a2.org.afilias-nst.info.
org	nameserver = b0.org.afilias-nst.org.
org	nameserver = b2.org.afilias-nst.org.
org	nameserver = c0.org.afilias-nst.info.
org	nameserver = d0.org.afilias-nst.org.
a0.org.afilias-nst.info	internet address = 199.19.56.1
a2.org.afilias-nst.info	internet address = 199.249.112.1
b0.org.afilias-nst.org	internet address = 199.19.54.1
b2.org.afilias-nst.org	internet address = 199.249.120.1
c0.org.afilias-nst.info	internet address = 199.19.53.1
d0.org.afilias-nst.org	internet address = 199.19.57.1
a0.org.afilias-nst.info	has AAAA address 2001:500:e::1
a2.org.afilias-nst.info	has AAAA address 2001:500:40::1
b0.org.afilias-nst.org	has AAAA address 2001:500:c::1
b2.org.afilias-nst.org	has AAAA address 2001:500:48::1
c0.org.afilias-nst.info	has AAAA address 2001:500:b::1
d0.org.afilias-nst.org	has AAAA address 2001:500:f::1

The root zone contains all information on all the top level domains, as well as the special KSK (Key Signing Keys) keys that underpin the DNSSEC system. In domain names, the root zone is represented as a final '.' at the end of the domain which is typically implied although there are rare technical reasons where it has to be referred to directly. Now that we've discussed and slightly explored the root zone, let's talk about the organization that administrates it, and the policy and rules related to the root, and the top-level domains referenced within.

What is ICANN?

The full history of ICANN is too long to recap here, but in short, ICANN is a multi-stakeholder community that represents various stakeholder groups and their interests and needs. In no specific order, these groups are as follows:

  • GAC - Government Advisory Committee
  • SSAC - Security and Stability Advisory Committee
  • RSSAC - Root Server System Advisory Committee
  • GNSO - Generic Names Supporting Organization
  • ccNSO - Country Code Names Supporting Organization
  • CSG - Commercial Stakeholder Group
  • ASO - Address Supporting Organization
  • At-Large/ALAC - At Large Advisory Community (Internet Endusers)

That's a LOT of acronyms, groups, and organizations, and this isn't even a complete list. Each of these groups (known as stakeholders) are essentially cross-sections of all internet users and work to drive policy that meet the goals of their interests and charters. Other groups primarily act in an advisory role such as SSAC in evaluating impact of policy changes to the ICANN board. ICANN stakeholder groups create working groups (many of which are open to the public) to accomplish goals and draft policy, respond to public policy comments, and create a final report. These are then followed by implementation.

As you can plainly see, ICANN is a massive multi-headed hydra that at first is not the most user-friendly beast to approach. At least from my perspective, getting involved was rather difficult. For this purpose, ICANN offers two programs to help get people involved: a fellowship program to bring both those with diversity or unique skills in and the NextGen program. I can't speak on NextGen, but I can speak to the fellowship program, and my personal story in how I both got involved and the topics and work I was involved in at ICANN63.

ICANN Fellowship Program

To talk about my experience as a fellow, we need to go back to February 2018 when I was in San Juan, Puerto Rico, visiting with a friend. While I was there, I saw large banners with the ICANN name and logo and some sort of conference. While I did not know the specifics at the time, what I was seeing was the ICANN61 General Policy Forum. As such, I walked in off the street, registered for a badge, and sat down at a high level meeting regarding an issue known as name collision hosted by the SSAC. This, and a few other meetings convinced me that becoming involved with ICANN was something I was personally interested in.

Unfortunately, getting your foot in the door with ICANN from the outside is something of a tall order. To help solve this problem, ICANN offers a fellowship program to help bring both diversity and talent within the community. As such, I was selected to attend ICANN63 on the basis of my position as an independent freelancer combined with strong technical skills. The fellowship program, currently managed by Siranush Vardanyan, is meant to help bring people into the ICANN community and guide them into position and niches where their skillsets can help. Many within ICANN bring technical, legal, policy, and activism talents to the table, and it is an extremely inclusive community to say the least. As was oft-repeated, 'Once a fellow, always a fellow'. Through the fellowship program, I was assigned a coach, Alfredo Calderon who helped me get involved with the gTLD working groups, and help decode the maze that I described above.

The intent of the fellowship is to prepare those to attend a face-to-face meeting (in this case, ICANN63), and help the fellow become active within the ICANN community. In my case, I managed to hit the ground running as in the intervening months between ICANN61 and 63, I had gotten involved with the Internet Society, and several working groups within the IETF (albeit it on a semi-active basis). That combined with closely following the news allowed me to be productive from the start. What follows are issues that I was primarily involved with — it doesn't cover some of the larger discussions such as the GDPR/WHOIS policy development sessions.

New Generic Top Level Domains (gTLD)

Generic top level domains are generally the most common type of TLD most people encounter, comprising .com, .net, .org, etc. compared to the two letter country code TLDs (ccTLDs) such as .us or .io. Back in 2005, ICANN began developing policies to allow for the creation of new gTLDs, and in 2013, these new gTLDs began being added to the root zone as part of the New gTLD Program. Since the initial land rush and additions, ICANN has been developing new rules relating to this process in the form of the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP (Policy Development Process) working group (known as the SubPro), which I'm a member of. I've primarily worked to ensure that not for profit and smaller communities can't be outbid or driven out of the process of obtaining their own gTLDs.

Expansion of the generic TLDs help relieve strain on the already crowded .com/.org/.net registries and pave the way for full internationalization of the internet (a topic I'll cover below). While there have those who've felt that expanding gTLDs was a mistake, the ability to have domains such as .nyc for sites relating to New York City has shown that the new gTLD program has real world benefits that we're already experiencing today. However, creating and expanding gTLDs also has opened a paradox's box of sorts which involves the SubPro, specifically in the the realm of string contention and name collisions.

String Contention and Name Collisions

In a perfect world, everyone would have one unique name and registering a new gTLD would be an easy and straightforward process. Unfortunately, we don't live in that sort of world; we live in a world where the Government of Brazil, and Amazon both want the .amazon TLD. This is what's known as a string contention; when multiple parties want the same domain string, and part of my work within the SubPro is building and designing mechanisms for handling contentions, as well as a last resort process which is fair for all parties. In the last round of gTLD additions, many string contentions were solved either by private party, or through a last resort auction process. At the direction of the ICANN board, the SubPro has been reviewing the results of this last round, ensuring that all actors, especially smaller community-based ones have an equal chance of being given a gTLD, and making sure no one can be strong-armed out of the process. I (and others within the SubPro) have been working on creating and streamlining the new gTLD process, and making sure that no single party can monopolize a string by simply outspending everyone. Of course, social issues aren't the only hangup when creating a new top-level domain; you can have a name collision.

Name collisions are a closely related problem dealing with the technical issues of what happens when you add a name to the root zone that's already in use in other contexts. For example, the Tor network could be entirely shafted if .onion was added to the root zone as it's used as a pseudo-TLD. Unfortunately, because of literally decades of bad practice, poor device coding, and similar historical artifacts, it means that the root zones get thousands of requests per second for bogus top level domains. As part of adding any new TLD, a review is done to determine the technical impact — research by SSAC into the name collision issue as a whole is ongoing. While I'm not personally involved in this work as of yet, I am interested in joining it in the near future

Internationalized Domain Names (IDN)

Last, but not least, the final major activity I worked on was discussions related to the internationalization of domain names, and email address internationalization (EAI) with the goal of making ensuring the web is available for everyone. Due to the fact that DNS was designed in 1987, it was never designed with internationalization in mind and has required some arcane hacks to make it work. Let's take the string тест which is Russian for test; it displays properly because we support UTF-8. However, DNS was never designed to work with 8-bit characters. Instead, a system was created known as punycode. This system represents unicode in ASCII in a method that DNS can handle; so the domain тест.example becomes xn--e1aybc.example which can be handled by existing tools.

This however creates a disconnect between the displayed name (known as the U-label) and the ASCII representation (A-label) of a domain name, which is known to break software that either renders domain names, or in the cases of email, must amend information to its log files. It also leads to issues with SSL certificates, and other confusion within the ecosystem due to poor support. While IDNs have been around for awhile, new codepoints including right-to-left ones are being added that require more testing and development. I've started one of two projects to help study and test IDNs, and an active participant of the Universal Acceptance mailing lists on the subject.

dnscatcher and idn-root-zone

As part of the meetings and other work, I've started work on two projects to help raise awareness and study ongoing problems with the world of DNS by creating tools to help monitor the health of the ecosystem as a whole. The first of these is a project that I'm tentatively calling DNS Catcher, and its intent is to study the perspective of the domain name system from the viewpoint of the end user.

As we know from study from data related to authoritative name servers, and the root zone, a lot of recursive revolvers and end-user devices send bogus data, such as catching all missing domains with a wildcard, or sending bogus requests to the root. DNS Catcher is an attempt to quantify the problem from the last mile and understand what data devices are sending out. While it's still in very early proof of concept, the catcher's end goal is to compare known good authorize zone data to data collected from various locations such as public access points and more so as to identify bad actors within the DNS community. It's still in the early pre-alpha stage, but my initial coding efforts have left me optimistic I may have an alpha version ready to go by the end of the year which will be subject to its own blog post.

The other is what I'm calling tentatively calling Root Zone in a Box, a series of shell scripts, instructions and docker containers to automatically recreate a simulation of the DNS root zone, and other core internet functionality to allow testing of potential changes to DNS, as well as help study and debug various issues related to Internationalized Domain Names. Compared to dnscatacher, I've gotten further on this project as it's somewhat higher priority. While likely not of interest to most as of yet, RZiaB is basically designed to help validate and ensure that internationalized domain names and email address internationalization works smoothly and that issues can be quickly identified and fixed using an easy-to-host environment that can be quickly set up.

I'll likely talk more of these projects in separate posts at later dates, but I invite people to comment and review my work.

Other Odds and Ends

As with any conference, there was various interesting conversations, discussions, and round tables that you really don't experience in a purely electronic environment. One of these (which was the direct inspiration for DNS catcher) was discussing why some devices send bogus data (in the form of random hex strings) to the internet root zone. I postulated that the answer was it was the one more-or-less sure fire way to know if you have anyone tampering with your DNS data such as captive portals, restrictive firewalls, or ISPs who don't like to return NXDomain.

Another big part are social dinners and gatherings. One personal highlight is I also had a fairly decent conversation with the appointed representative to the GAC from the Holy See, dealing with domain name issues relating to the Vatican. We primarily talked about working at the Vatican, the papacy's interest in ICANN, and life within the city. As far as unique individuals go, this easily makes a spot on my top ten list!

In Closing

Although my time in Barcelona has come to an end, my involvement within ICANN is higher than ever. We're doing strong work to try and keep the internet open and accessible to all, and we're always looking for anyone with an interest to get involved. The Fellowship experience helped me connect with individuals that let me reach my personal goals of working on the SubPro, as well as connected me to the IDN working group folks in a way that I hope to pave a new cornerstone of the internet for non-English speaking individuals. There's a lot of work ahead, but I can say with certainty that my work with ICANN will continue, and I look forward to what the future will hold. If you're interested in my projects, comment below, or follow me on Twitter: @fossfirefighter where I post about my work on DNS catcher, RZiaB, and other things that don't make SoylentNews... like a retroBBS hacking project.

If You Want To Get Involved

If what you've read interests you, and you want to get involved in ICANN yourself, a good starting place is the alac-announce mailing list which posts which working groups are in progress, have meetings, and other good information, as well as joining your regional At-Large community. Most working groups (WGs) don't require membership in a stakeholder group, so you can just dive in; you're simply expected to familiarize yourself with the WG's previous history up to that point for the most part. There is also a set of learning resources at learn.icann.org, and I'm happy to take questions here or on Twitter.

Acknowledgements

Before signing off, I want to personally thank several individuals who helped me get here. First, Alfredo Calderon, my ICANN coach and Siranush Vardanyan, manager of the fellowship program. Both were very understanding and helpful with some personal difficulties I ran into during the fellowship program and both of them contributed greatly to a successful face-to-face meeting. Next, I'd like to thank Martin Pablo Silva, who continuously encouraged me to apply for the Fellowship, and helped make sure my application was in tip-top shape, and last, but not least, Dina Solveig Jalkanen (who prefers to go by Thomas), who introduced me to ICANN and is a close personal friend and who is was instrumental in making this possible.

Until the next time ...

73 de NCommander

Related Stories

Community Roundtable: Monday, June 8th, 2020 242 comments

As promised, here's the round-table discussion post that I said on Wednesday was coming. We have a long history at SoylentNews of listening and responding to our community; I genuinely hope that never changes. I also recognize that I may have ruffled some feathers in the last few weeks with original content postings so here's the best place to get this all out.

I am mindful of the community's support and goodwill; I don't want to squander any of it. Yes, there are times where my hand may be forced (e.g., DCMA takedowns). Still, I'm always a bit hesitant whenever I post on the main site for anything that isn't site update news or similar. I may be the de facto site leader, but I want my submissions to be treated like anyone else's — I want no favoritism. The editorial team does review my stories and signs off before they go live (unless it's an "emergency" situation such as the last time we blew up the site). However, as the saying goes, the buck stops with me.

SoylentNews accepts original content. I'm also aware that I've probably submitted the most original content so far (See "Previously", below for some examples). I'm grateful for the community's apparent acceptance of my submissions and the positive responses to them. What I don't know is if there is an undercurrent of displeasure with these. Maybe everyone thinks these are all fine. Then again, maybe somebody has an issue with them. Rather than assume anything, let's get it all out in the open.

What I want to cover in this round-table discussion is original content and having images in posts as well as topics such as yesterday's Live Show on Improving Your Security -- Wednesday June 3rd, 2020.

So, contributors and commenters to SoylentNews, get that Reply button hot and let me hear your feedback. As usual, either a member of staff or I will respond to your comments below,

73 de NCommander

Previously:
(2020-06-03) Live Show on Improving Your Security -- Wednesday June 3rd, 2020
(2020-05-24) Retrotech: The Novell NetWare Experience
(2020-05-14) Exploring Windows for Workgroups 3.11 - Early 90s Networking
(2020-05-10) Examining Windows 1.0 HELLO.C - 35 Years of Backwards Compatibility
(2020-05-15) Meta: Having a Chat about SoylentNews' Internet Relay Chat
(2018-10-25) My Time as an ICANN Fellow
(2017-10-09) soylentnews.org experiencing DNSSEC issues
(2017-04-20) Soylentnews.org is Moving to Gentoo...
(2017-04-17) SN Security Updates: CAA, LogJam, HTTP Method Disable, and 3DES
(2017-03-13) Xenix 2.2.3c Restoration: Xrossing The X (Part 4)

Review: Hesiod Name Services System 31 comments

Most system administrators working with a large number machines will be at least passingly familiar with LDAP, or it's Microsoft's incarnation as Active Directory. Like most organizations, we used LDAP to organize shell account information for SN's backend servers, and spent the last year and a half cursing because of it. As such, we've recently replaced LDAP with a much older technology known as Hesiod, which is a DNS-based system of storing user accounts and other similar information. Given Hesiod's unique history (and relative obscurity), I though it would be interesting to write a review and detailed history of this relic, as well as go more in-depth why we migrated.

In this novel:

  • Why We Dumped LDAP
  • Project Athena
  • Overview of Hesiod
  • Drawbacks
  • In Closing

Read past the break for a look at this piece of living history.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 4, Funny) by pkrasimirov on Wednesday November 07 2018, @03:11PM (1 child)

    by pkrasimirov (3358) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday November 07 2018, @03:11PM (#758983)

    > DNS is compromised of a network
    It easily can be but is not always the case :)
    /joke
    I guess you meant "comprised" but it still makes sense.

    Anyway, thank you for what you're doing!

    • (Score: 2) by martyb on Wednesday November 07 2018, @04:23PM

      by martyb (76) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday November 07 2018, @04:23PM (#759020) Journal

      > DNS is compromised of a network
      It easily can be but is not always the case :)
      /joke
      I guess you meant "comprised" but it still makes sense.

      Anyway, thank you for what you're doing!

      Ooops! And... Fixed! And another one that slipped through with it. Thanks for bringing that up!

      --
      Wit is intellect, dancing.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 07 2018, @04:32PM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 07 2018, @04:32PM (#759024)

    This michael is ncommander?

    • (Score: 2) by MostCynical on Wednesday November 07 2018, @09:20PM (1 child)

      by MostCynical (2589) on Wednesday November 07 2018, @09:20PM (#759152) Journal

      Yes [linkedin.com]. He is. [github.com]

      --
      "I guess once you start doubting, there's no end to it." -Batou, Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 07 2018, @10:00PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 07 2018, @10:00PM (#759170)

        That’s the problem with namefagging; it’s trivially easy to get doxxxexd.

  • (Score: 3, Informative) by martyb on Wednesday November 07 2018, @04:45PM

    by martyb (76) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday November 07 2018, @04:45PM (#759034) Journal

    As the person who tested SoylentNews' implementation of Unicode / UTF-8 support, I can attest that this area is (1) important and (2) challenging.

    Turtles all the way down is a fair description of the layers of abstraction, representation, and presentation that apply here.

    I'm pressed for time atm, but just wanted to acknowledge how challenging an effort this is, and how fortunate ICANN is to have NCommander working on it!

    --
    Wit is intellect, dancing.
  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 07 2018, @05:26PM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 07 2018, @05:26PM (#759059)

    They used to run their web server on the top-level domain. The URL was http://va/ [va] of course, and then also with the www.

    Lots of buggy software had issues with this. It's a shame the old URL had to go. It was special.

    • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 07 2018, @07:42PM (2 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 07 2018, @07:42PM (#759118)

      random question -- do any of the other major religions have TLDs? How about other large non-government organizations (NGOs)? Then there is the gray area of "semi-religions", I can see Bob Dobbs and the subgenius wanting .slack with obvious commercial collisions (Dobbs was using SLACK in the 1970s).

      The goog found this older story which isn't promising...
          https://www.reuters.com/article/net-us-internet-religion-names-idUSBRE87U0L320120831 [reuters.com]

      And, a big Thanks to NCommander for the interesting article! Good luck, should you ever lose interest in ICANN, I might know where there is a good job available, herding cats.

      • (Score: 3, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 07 2018, @09:21PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 07 2018, @09:21PM (#759153)

        The reason why the Vatican gets a TLD is because they are their own independent country. Hence, ".va" is the ccTLD for the Vatican City, and can be used however the government there wants.

      • (Score: 2) by Pino P on Thursday November 08 2018, @02:53AM

        by Pino P (4721) on Thursday November 08 2018, @02:53AM (#759280) Journal

        I guess Judaism has Israel's TLD, and Islam has Saudi Arabia's, and Hinduism has India's.

  • (Score: 2) by linkdude64 on Wednesday November 07 2018, @08:12PM

    by linkdude64 (5482) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday November 07 2018, @08:12PM (#759128)

    As an unseasoned NOC Technician who has edited a small handful of comparatively unimportant A records for websites whose names I cannot name-drop effectively,, DNS has always* interested me**, especially before I worked for that datacenter. The Wikipedia entries on the early internet are well-written and fascinating. A couple years ago I happened to be able to take a dump in their global HQ bathroom due to a personal connection to one of the staffers over there. Got some spare hardware they were going to throw out with their asset tags still on them, too. Seem like an all-around bunch of Nice Guys in there, at least in the more nuts-and-bolts software dev sorts of positions. Good people to run a business like that, and they get paid very well, with great retirement and vacation packages. I certainly do take all those types as ones who would take immediate and unquestioned action to censor a right-wing website but think twice before censoring an ISIL/S website using the DNS, but I digress. Oh, how dearly I wish someone like Benjamin Franklin had been born and bred in the time of the internet. Such interesting things would be said.

    *Always/eternity = the past 10 years or so

    **myself (yes, this is bad humor)

  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by edIII on Wednesday November 07 2018, @09:43PM

    by edIII (791) on Wednesday November 07 2018, @09:43PM (#759162)

    Thanks for representing the small guys and non-profits. The contributions you are making sound pretty cool. Looking forward to that blog post.

    --
    Technically, lunchtime is at any moment. It's just a wave function.
(1)