Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Community Reviews
posted by Fnord666 on Tuesday October 10 2017, @01:36AM   Printer-friendly
from the swords-are-technology dept.

I have been reading The Japanese Sword Column and thought it may be of niche interest to other Soylentils. It is written by Paul Martin, a noted British expert of Japanese swords. From the introduction:

Along with cherry blossoms and Mount Fuji, the Japanese sword has become one of the enduring symbols of Japan. It has experienced centuries of warfare, evolved through Mongol invasions, survived the introduction of the musket, the end of the samurai era, modernization, and confiscation and destruction by the Allied forces following World War II. They are an anachronism in modern society, yet they continue to be made. They are an integral part of Japanese culture.
Today, I feel very fortunate that we have access to Japanese swords and can observe the artistry of blades that were previously only accessible by Japan's ancient military and social elites.

I particularly enjoyed the July 25th article, The Changes in the Shape of the Japanese Sword. The articles are short, update infrequently and have plenty of pictures of museum-quality swords. A good fit for those with a casual interest in the subject.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 12 2017, @06:32PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 12 2017, @06:32PM (#581269)

    Yeah. Those peasants? Turns out a huge number were Lords. Ie. stakeholders. They could even treat war as business, directly by ransoming captures, and indirectly by taking tribute or ransacking conquered people, or being installed in 'new' baronies etc. in conquered (nb. not 'occupied'!) lands. Even in the flattest king-led army, there would have been a tier of well equipped warriors and below them their men-at-arms or footpads. Kings didn't conscript off the field, "you, you and you, take up swords and follow me."