Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password


Mars, Ho!

Posted by mcgrew on Monday February 24 2014, @06:10PM (#90)
0 Comments
/dev/random

The book I'm working on now is the same name as the title of this journal. It was started at slashot, but will be finished here. I'll post it there, but the soyled get it first.

Except that it's already started and from what I can tell, none of the folks here at soylent know me. So for the next few days I'll be posting Martian whores here.

You had no idea what you were getting into, did you?

Neither did I.

What you will read is a crude, first draft. Stuff will be added to existing chapters, stuff will go away, and the order of some will most likely be changed. For an example, look at this finished, edited version of Nobots chapter 7 (which stands on its own as a story) compared to the draft.

I'll start posting chapters tomorrow. Wish Soylent had a "sci-fi" category...

Study Shows Mammogram Screenings Don't Reduce Cancer Death R

Posted by Papas Fritas on Monday February 24 2014, @02:09PM (#86)
0 Comments
Science
In the United States, about 37 million mammograms are performed annually at a cost of about $100 per mammogram and nearly three-quarters of women age 40 and over say they had a mammogram in the past year. Now the NYT reports that a study involving 90,000 women and lasting a quarter-century has added powerful new doubts about the value of the screening test for women of any age finding that the death rates from breast cancer and from all causes were the same in women who got mammograms and those who did not. "It will make women uncomfortable, and they should be uncomfortable," says screening expert Dr. Russell P. Harris who was not involved in the study. "The decision to have a mammogram should not be a slam dunk." An editorial accompanying the new study says that earlier studies that found mammograms helped women were done before the routine use of drugs like tamoxifen that sharply reduced the breast cancer death rate. In addition, many previous studies did not use the gold-standard methods of the clinical trial, randomly assigning women to be screened or not, noted the editorial's author, Dr. Mette Kalager. According to Kalager, with better treatments, like tamoxifen, it is less important to find cancers early. Also, she says, women in the study were aware of breast cancer and its dangers, unlike women in earlier studies who were more likely to ignore lumps. "As time goes by we do indeed need more efficient mechanisms to reconsider priorities and recommendations for mammography screening and other medical interventions," concludes Kalager. "This is not an easy task, because governments, research funders, scientists, and medical practitioners may have vested interests in continuing activities that are well established."

Coming soon: The Paxil Diaries

Posted by mcgrew on Sunday February 23 2014, @03:47PM (#83)
2 Comments
News

This journal probably fits the other site better, since I don't think any of my old fans have come here yet, but I did say I'd post journals here first.

Ten years ago K5 was thriving, and my diaries got popular there. Folks wanted me to make a book out of them, and I promised I would.

I never got around to it, despite people periodically nagging me to. I finally did put together a PDF. I'd excised much of it, thinking it was too long, and emailed copies to those who asked.

Last Fall when I released the hardcover of Nobots I was again chided to get The Paxil Diaries on cellulose.

I'd discovered that no, it wasn't too long at all, and the abridged version was too short. So I redid the whole thing. I've been working on it almost exclusively for months and neglecting Mars, Ho! which I haven't done anything to since fall.

All that's left before publication is registering a copyright (it's half done in another tab), registering an ISBN (I have nine in reserve) and making a cover.

The cover is the sticking point. It's going to be a photo of downtown Springfield with Betty Boop photoshopped in, and I'm waiting for Springtime to take the photo.

So if anyone reading this has been urging me to release a physical book, I'm projecting sometime in April.

Nobots: The whole book is now online!

Posted by mcgrew on Saturday February 22 2014, @01:35PM (#77)
3 Comments
News

Get it here!

So why did I move the release date up? Soylent! Or rather, a... uh, what do we call ourselves? Folks at K5 used to call themselves Kurobots, at slashdot they're slashdotters. What are we? Soylents? Anyway, a fellow here commented "Damn you! I went to see what your book was about and before I knew it I'm on chapter 7 and feel the urge to finish it tonight (otherwise I wont sleep). I've had plans for tonight..."

I'd just gotten my first check for books that had been sold the day before, but comments like that are even better than the check. I mean, I didn't write it to make money, I wrote it to be enjoyed. I walked around with a smile on my face all day and thought "gee, I need to let that poor fellow finish the book." So now you can!

If you're using FireFox to read it, PDF isn't the version to choose since FireFox sucks at rendering PDFs. It is, however, faithful to the printed version. Actually it was used to produce the printed version, and there may be some words in the HTML versions that should be italicized but aren't, I've found and fixed one or two but I'm sure I've missed some. Also, the PDF and printed versions are Gentium Book Basic while the HTML versions are Times New Roman. There is one passage that is Aral and renders funky in the HTML, and later in the book there's a Venusian nursery rhyme that is Comic Sans Serif in the printed and PDF versions.

I haven't posted the e-book version yet because I'm not satisfied with it.

If you select single file HTML (which you can download, of course) the screen will change only slightly, with links to PDF and e-book missing. Links to chapters are internal links.

I hope you folks enjoy it, that's why I wrote it.

SNQ*: Squadron of Circus Chickens or Barrel of Rabid Geese?

Posted by Yog-Yogguth on Friday February 21 2014, @08:02PM (#66)
0 Comments
Answers

Betteridge be damned: which is better?.

I think I'll keep the CC Squad as protection and use the BRG as a grenade! I also have a spare Barrel of Uber Robots but I'm not sure what their stats are.

* SNQ is short for "Soylent News Question"

Nobots Chapter Thirty Two

Posted by mcgrew on Friday February 21 2014, @02:43PM (#63)
0 Comments
/dev/random

Online now. This is a Soylent exclusive, the above link is the only link on the internet. The index and previous chapter don't link yet.

Rority never showed up in his timeship, so we're stuck in the present today. Which isn't too bad, we're having a few days of, if not warmth, at least not below zero cold. And of course I don't mean Celcius or I'd simply said "freezing".

Not that the weather was actually nice yesterday, we had thunderstorms followed by high winds, with gusts almost hurricane level.

I tried to get to Soylent on my Kyocera Android Jelly Bean this morning, and I couldn't. Google apparently doesn't have a clue about soylent, at least from the phone. It sent me to food places and all other sorts of sites, but Soylent News was nowhere to be found.

Maybe this is a good thing. All the two digit IQs showing up at slashdot have annoyed me lately and I'm hoping they stay there and reddit where they came from. Or at least, if they show up here that they realize their ignorance and STFU. I have yet to see more than one moronic comment posted here, and it was from an AC.

In other news, today will be my last Friday. After today, Friday won't exist for me; every Friday from now on is Saturday -- I'm retiring from work. Thursday is my last day of wage slavery! My former shop steward, who is now not even in the union because they promoted him to management, said "Hey, short timer! Unemployed next week?"

"Nope," I said. "Self employed. I got a check in the mail for my book yesterday." Of course, we're not talking James patterson money, just beer money.

I got another positive review about Nobots last night at Felbers. I left a copy there for folks to read, as most of those rednecks' only internet connections are their phones, few have computers. I wish someone would give me a negative critique, "I loved you book" isn't vey helpful.

Apologies, I was unprepared. I usually do this on Saturdays when I have all day, but I'm kind of rushed, I have to go to work today.

A week from tomorrow I'm releasing the rest of the book, two weeks early. I'll post Chapter 33 Tuesday and link from here, slashdot will get this chapter tomorrow and 33 Wednesday.

A thank you to all who have started reading. Someone please leave a review!

Steve Jobs to Appear on US Postage Stamp

Posted by Papas Fritas on Friday February 21 2014, @06:37AM (#62)
2 Comments
Business
Steven Musil writes at Cnet that the US Postal Service hopes Steve Jobs can do for it what he once did for Apple as the late Apple co-founder will be featured on a commemorative US postage stamp along with Johnny Carson, Ingrid Bergman, Elvis Presley, and James Brown. The former Apple CEO's stamp is still in the design stages and will be released at some point in 2015. Jobs, who passed away in 2011 after a battle with pancreatic cancer, has also been posthumously honored for his visionary achievements with a special Grammy Merit Award and a Disney Legends Award. Jobs was also inducted into the Bay Area Business Hall of Fame, has had a building at Pixar named after him, and was featured in an exhibit at the US Patent Office Museum. "The profitable first class mail business has been decimated by email over the past decade, thanks in no small part to the contributions of Steve Jobs and Apple," writes Derek Kessler. "It's no small feat to be so impactful that the USPS feels compelled to honor you despite the fact that the work that you've done is dismantling the core of their business."

DuckDuckGo Is Google's Tiniest, Fiercest Competitor

Posted by Papas Fritas on Thursday February 20 2014, @06:11PM (#61)
2 Comments
Security
There's an interesting read by John Paul Titlow at Co.Labs about DuckDuckGo, a search engine launched in 2008 that is now doing 4 million search queries per day and growing 200-500% annually. DuckDuckGo's secret weapon is hardcore privacy. When you do a search from DuckDuckGo's website or one of its mobile apps, it doesn't know who you are. There are no user accounts. Your IP address isn't logged by default. The site doesn't use search cookies to keep track of what you do over time or where else you go online. "If you look at the logs of people's search sessions, they're the most personal thing on the Internet," says founder Gabriel Weinberg. "Unlike Facebook, where you choose what to post, with search you're typing in medical and financial problems and all sorts of other things. You're not thinking about the privacy implications of your search history." DuckDuckGo's no-holds-barred approach to privacy gives the search engine a unique selling point as Google gobbles up more private user data. "It was extreme at the time," says Weinberg. "And it still may be considered extreme by some people, but I think it's becoming less extreme nowadays. In the last year, it's become obvious why people don't want to be tracked."

Home!

Posted by Yog-Yogguth on Thursday February 20 2014, @05:05AM (#56)
0 Comments
/dev/random

So lovely to be back!!! Yes that's how it feels isn't it?

Had two UIDs on that other site, one relatively ancient forgotten one and one mostly unused as I joined the AC horde :)

But now... now home has been rebuilt! Awesome. Way back then I don't think I truly appreciated what was available --and I'm probably not the only one this applies to-- but now that we have lost it we have gained more so this time I'll try to make better use of it.

Not that I'll be prolific or anything like that but I'll scamper about once in a while *crams stuff into 255 char bio*.

Atmospheric Physicist Warns of Overselling Climate Change

Posted by Papas Fritas on Wednesday February 19 2014, @04:25PM (#46)
0 Comments
Science
Patrick Michaels writes in Forbes that atmospheric physicist Garth Paltridge has laid out several well-known uncertainties in climate forecasting including our inability to properly simulate clouds that are anything like what we see in the real world, the embarrassing lack of average surface warming now in its 17th year, and the fumbling (and contradictory) attempts to explain it away. According to Paltridge, an emeritus professor at the University of Tasmania and a fellow of the Australian Academy of Science, virtually all scientists directly involved in climate prediction are aware of the enormous uncertainties associated with their product. How then is it that those of them involved in the latest report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) can put their hands on their hearts and maintain there is a 95 per cent probability that human emissions of carbon dioxide have caused most of the global warming that has occurred over the last several decades? In short, there is more than enough uncertainty about the forecasting of climate to allow normal human beings to be at least reasonably hopeful that global warming might not be nearly as bad as is currently touted. Climate scientists, and indeed scientists in general, are not so lucky. They have a lot to lose if time should prove them wrong. "In the light of all this, we have at least to consider the possibility that the scientific establishment behind the global warming issue has been drawn into the trap of seriously overstating the climate problem-or, what is much the same thing, of seriously understating the uncertainties associated with the climate problem-in its effort to promote the cause," writes Paltridge. "It is a particularly nasty trap in the context of science, because it risks destroying, perhaps for centuries to come, the unique and hard-won reputation for honesty which is the basis of society's respect for scientific endeavor."