(Trying to turn grumpiness about rejection into something positive for Soylent)
The other day I submitted a story on the woes of Greece (when I wrote it, the Greek prime minister had just called for a referendum, which basically blew the entire negotiations completely out of the water and would likely imply that Greece would default on its loans - which it did today).
The story was rejected.
Within a few hours of that, there was a story running that a woman had cut down a flag which was put up again within a matter of hours.
Neither of these stories are tech-related. One was accepted, the other one rejected. Unfortunately, Rehash doesn't yet have a system to tell me *why* this was rejected. That is a pity, because now I'm wondering what the difference is what made the one submission accepted and the other rejected. Is it in the write-up? That can be improved for a next submission. Or is it the subject? In that case, which general news subjects do we like? Stories about something that will likely have major long-term economic impact are out, while stories about things that will keep social media abuzz for a week or so are in?
That's probably not it. Other possible ways these particular stories contrast:
- One is about economics (we don't care), the other is about civil disobedience (we love).
- One is about fast-developing issues, the other is a "done" case.
- One is covered in general news well enough, and the other... ermmms, is covered well enough too?
- One is about Europe, the other about the US.
The above is only about two particular stories, but in general, comments would be great.
They help clarify the editor's view on acceptable stories is, thereby helping submitters focus on stories that Soylent would want to run in some form.
PS: If someone has a good argument why Greece's financial woes don't belong on Soylent, but removal of a flag that is replaced within the hour does, I'm interested!