Slash Boxes

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday August 23 2019, @06:17AM   Printer-friendly
from the tragedy-of-the-commons dept.

I was going to post this to a particular story, but thought this might generate more attention and discussion as a general submission.

Seriously, what is going on with all these troll mods? Just because you disagree with someone, thus earning a "disagree" mod, does not mean that person is a "troll." To steal a definition from Urban Dictionary:

An Internet troll, or simply troll in Internet slang, is someone who posts controversial, inflammatory, irrelevant or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum or chat room, with the primary intent of provoking other users into an emotional response or to generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion.

Just because you disagree with someone, does not mean they are trying to do the above. Be faster on the "disagree" and slower on the "troll." Under such abuse, it is hard to have a good discussion and, in itself, is trollish behavior by "generally disrupt[ing] normal on-topic discussion." Other than people disciplining themselves, a concerted effort to police such abuses, or making moderation logs public on the bottom of a comment where the score is shown now, I'm unsure of what to do about. As it stands, it is getting increasingly ridiculous to read what discussion is here on any topic remotely controversial, and is expanding outside of even those. It is starting to drive me away from the site, and I'm somewhat confident it is doing the same for others. I'd be interested to see what others think about the depth of the problem, if they even believe it even exists at all, and what solutions you all have for it.

[Ed note. This story is published exactly as received. First off, it bears repeating that complaining about moderations in the comments often leads (rightly) to an off-topic moderation. That is a contributing factor to my decision to run this story. Secondly, moderation is something that I on occasion have found I've fat-fingered and given a different moderation than expected. Thirdly, in the grand scheme of things, a comment's moderation is — relatively speaking — small potatoes. It is NOT a measure of your IQ or value as a human being. or standing in the community. Just accept that stuff happens and that as likely as not, someone will be along to moderate it the other way. Which is a good opportunity to say: PLEASE USE YOUR MOD POINTS! Lastly, if you think a comment was moderated in error, then send the CID (Comment ID) link e.g. "(#876543)" in an email to admin (at) soylentnews (dot) org. Keep in mind however that we are all volunteers here and there most likely will be a delay between when you send out an email and when we can get around to it. --martyb]

[Updated: 20190823_111312 UTC See comment from JR who far more precisely and eloquently expressed the idea I was attempting to. I concur with his assessment. If I want people to upmod a comment of mine that I believe was unfairly downmodded, then I need to be willing to upmod other's mis-modded comments. For perspective, so far this month, anywhere from ~150-~350 mod points were used in any given day. It bears repeating: use your mod points!]

Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by FatPhil on Monday August 26 2019, @10:30AM (2 children)

    by FatPhil (863) <> on Monday August 26 2019, @10:30AM (#885588) Homepage
    Why do you complain about someone else's disagree mod changing what you see, when the disagree mod, *by design*, does not change what you see?

    It looks like you've made a comment based on an incomplete understanding of the subject you're discussing. How should I, or others, moderate you for this mistake of yours?
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by rigrig on Monday August 26 2019, @12:54PM (1 child)

    by rigrig (5129) Subscriber Badge <> on Monday August 26 2019, @12:54PM (#885614) Homepage

    The FAQ [] states that

    In general, bad words will reduce a comment's score by a single point (a 'down mod'), good words increase a comment's score by a single point (an 'up mod')

    So I assumed "Disagree" would lower the score, thus making me less likely to see it. Apparently it doesn't carry a score? Thanks for pointing that out.

    How should I, or others, moderate you for this mistake of yours?

    Probably not, but reply with a correction instead (which hopefully gets modded Informative for corrections of less-obvious mistakes)

    No one remembers the singer.
    • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Tuesday August 27 2019, @12:19AM

      by FatPhil (863) <> on Tuesday August 27 2019, @12:19AM (#885869) Homepage
      Some day it's the wasted mod, but perhaps it's the strongest mod of all because of that. Spittle-flinging downmods are perhaps just full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. At least when comments are modded to "invisibility", their posters are still identifiable, so you can open the view of that post if you suspect someone who's normally posting sense might have unfairly downmodded.
      Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves