Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Meta
posted by martyb on Friday August 23 2019, @06:17AM   Printer-friendly
from the tragedy-of-the-commons dept.

I was going to post this to a particular story, but thought this might generate more attention and discussion as a general submission.

Seriously, what is going on with all these troll mods? Just because you disagree with someone, thus earning a "disagree" mod, does not mean that person is a "troll." To steal a definition from Urban Dictionary:

An Internet troll, or simply troll in Internet slang, is someone who posts controversial, inflammatory, irrelevant or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum or chat room, with the primary intent of provoking other users into an emotional response or to generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion.

Just because you disagree with someone, does not mean they are trying to do the above. Be faster on the "disagree" and slower on the "troll." Under such abuse, it is hard to have a good discussion and, in itself, is trollish behavior by "generally disrupt[ing] normal on-topic discussion." Other than people disciplining themselves, a concerted effort to police such abuses, or making moderation logs public on the bottom of a comment where the score is shown now, I'm unsure of what to do about. As it stands, it is getting increasingly ridiculous to read what discussion is here on any topic remotely controversial, and is expanding outside of even those. It is starting to drive me away from the site, and I'm somewhat confident it is doing the same for others. I'd be interested to see what others think about the depth of the problem, if they even believe it even exists at all, and what solutions you all have for it.

[Ed note. This story is published exactly as received. First off, it bears repeating that complaining about moderations in the comments often leads (rightly) to an off-topic moderation. That is a contributing factor to my decision to run this story. Secondly, moderation is something that I on occasion have found I've fat-fingered and given a different moderation than expected. Thirdly, in the grand scheme of things, a comment's moderation is — relatively speaking — small potatoes. It is NOT a measure of your IQ or value as a human being. or standing in the community. Just accept that stuff happens and that as likely as not, someone will be along to moderate it the other way. Which is a good opportunity to say: PLEASE USE YOUR MOD POINTS! Lastly, if you think a comment was moderated in error, then send the CID (Comment ID) link e.g. "(#876543)" in an email to admin (at) soylentnews (dot) org. Keep in mind however that we are all volunteers here and there most likely will be a delay between when you send out an email and when we can get around to it. --martyb]

[Updated: 20190823_111312 UTC See comment from JR who far more precisely and eloquently expressed the idea I was attempting to. I concur with his assessment. If I want people to upmod a comment of mine that I believe was unfairly downmodded, then I need to be willing to upmod other's mis-modded comments. For perspective, so far this month, anywhere from ~150-~350 mod points were used in any given day. It bears repeating: use your mod points!]


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Azuma Hazuki on Wednesday August 28 2019, @10:17PM (3 children)

    by Azuma Hazuki (5086) on Wednesday August 28 2019, @10:17PM (#887007) Journal

    And I don't particularly find a couple of semi-insightful points buried in a mound of idiot, inflammatory trolling like solitary corn kernels in a huge steaming turd "interesting conversation." So downmods it is. Glad we cleared that up!

    --
    I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Thursday August 29 2019, @12:51AM (2 children)

    by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Thursday August 29 2019, @12:51AM (#887078) Homepage Journal

    You're saying you only downmod things that detract from an on-topic conversation? You forget that I can see your mod history? You're not one of our more intellectually honest moderators, though you're not the worst by a damned sight.

    --
    My rights don't end where your fear begins.
    • (Score: 2) by aristarchus on Thursday August 29 2019, @01:22AM

      by aristarchus (2645) on Thursday August 29 2019, @01:22AM (#887093) Journal

      I find this an interesting concept:

      not one of our more intellectually honest moderators,

      I would be interested in subscribing to The Mighty Buzzard newsletter of Intellectual Honesty, please.

    • (Score: 2) by Azuma Hazuki on Thursday August 29 2019, @01:58PM

      by Azuma Hazuki (5086) on Thursday August 29 2019, @01:58PM (#887274) Journal

      I downmod things that are flat wrong too, no matter how "interesting" they might appear.

      See, you're committing the Fox News Fallacy, the idea that any two sides of an issue are equally valid and equally worth listening to. Fuck no the fuck they aren't, and I'm not going to fall for that smirking, sociopathic gambit. I know what's behind it:"Hurr hurr, they're so fucking goodie-two-shoes rule-bound, let's flood them with utter shit and accuse them of being hypocrites if they don't engage with perfect civility!"

      No. Fuck you, and fuck everyone who tries that, and fuck you a second time for thinking I and others can't see exactly what you're doing.

      --
      I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...