Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Politics
posted by Fnord666 on Saturday June 03 2017, @07:08PM   Printer-friendly
from the your-myspace-account-please dept.

The Trump administration has rolled out a new questionnaire for U.S. visa applicants worldwide that asks for social media handles for the last five years and biographical information going back 15 years.

The new questions, part of an effort to tighten vetting of would-be visitors to the United States, was approved on May 23 by the Office of Management and Budget despite criticism from a range of education officials and academic groups during a public comment period.

Critics argued that the new questions would be overly burdensome, lead to long delays in processing and discourage international students and scientists from coming to the United States.

Under the new procedures, consular officials can request all prior passport numbers, five years' worth of social media handles, email addresses and phone numbers and 15 years of biographical information including addresses, employment and travel history.

Officials will request the additional information when they determine "that such information is required to confirm identity or conduct more rigorous national security vetting," a State Department official said on Wednesday.

The State Department said earlier the tighter vetting would apply to visa applicants "who have been determined to warrant additional scrutiny in connection with terrorism or other national security-related visa ineligibilities."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Sunday June 04 2017, @03:06PM (1 child)

    by maxwell demon (1608) on Sunday June 04 2017, @03:06PM (#520229) Journal

    Why not use for the example a much more accurate test with merely 0.05% false positive rate? And in addition, assume it never fails to recognize an actual terrorist. With those specifications, the majority of people could be easily convinced that everyone who tests positive must be a terrorist.

    Yet on someone from your Country X, the probability that someone identified by the algorithm as terrorist actually is a terrorist would still be about 0.2%.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 04 2017, @03:31PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 04 2017, @03:31PM (#520240)

    Yep, it is the same deal as the diagnostic medical testing scam currently being implemented.