Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Politics
posted by n1 on Thursday June 08 2017, @08:17AM   Printer-friendly
from the other-people's-money dept.

The Republican-controlled house and senates of Kansas voted to increase taxes and to override the governor's veto of a bill to increase taxes.

The current governor pushed through tax cuts, intended to grow Kansas' economy, but during the tax cuts, Kansas' growth was lower than the country's overall growth.

The increase follows years in which the state was unable to balance its budget, and the funding for education was found to be unconstitutionally low.

In my view, state budgets are likely to take a hit from Trump's stealth tax increase: by reducing funding for programs and forcing the states to step in, the states will have to find extra money to fill the gaps.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 08 2017, @03:50PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 08 2017, @03:50PM (#522635)

    Right, so the states on the Coast are not the primary beneficiary of a CROSS FUCKING COUNTRY highway system that links both coasts?

    This nonsense about comparing in-flow and outflow of money is pure utter bullshit. A lot of the Federal spending in Red states is for shit they either don't want or don't use. And the things that do benefit them directly by generating economic activity, are good for the nation as a whole. It allows for spreading of capital around the country, which also spreads the population around the country. Last thing you want is your whole country's population in two fucking places. It would be an economic, environmental, and strategic disaster.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by NewNic on Thursday June 08 2017, @09:51PM

    by NewNic (6420) on Thursday June 08 2017, @09:51PM (#522814) Journal

    Right, so the states on the Coast are not the primary beneficiary of a CROSS FUCKING COUNTRY highway system that links both coasts?

    Actually, no.

    There is this small project called the Panama canal. It makes shipping products from coast to coast by sea very practical.

    What you are saying is that landlocked states that would have very poor access to both the big coastal markets and ports benefit less than the coastal states from interstate highway system? LOL.

    --
    lib·er·tar·i·an·ism ˌlibərˈterēənizəm/ noun: Magical thinking that useful idiots mistake for serious political theory