Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Politics
posted by martyb on Sunday September 24 2017, @11:02AM   Printer-friendly
from the Programming-Jobs dept.

Commentary from The Guardian

The rationale for this rapid curricular renovation is economic. Teaching kids how to code will help them land good jobs, the argument goes. In an era of flat and falling incomes, programming provides a new path to the middle class – a skill so widely demanded that anyone who acquires it can command a livable, even lucrative, wage.

This narrative pervades policymaking at every level, from school boards to the government. Yet it rests on a fundamentally flawed premise. Contrary to public perception, the economy doesn't actually need that many more programmers. As a result, teaching millions of kids to code won't make them all middle-class. Rather, it will proletarianize the profession by flooding the market and forcing wages down – and that's precisely the point.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Sunday September 24 2017, @10:40PM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Sunday September 24 2017, @10:40PM (#572470) Journal

    The problem is that they're lying about it

    In other words, that their motives are impure. Why do we care?

    Why should employers get these free source of labor at almost no cost to themselves?

    Labor isn't free. They still have to pay for it in wages and benefits.

    What's special about programming that we need to subsidize employers to help them reduce labor costs for this one profession? Why don't we do this for doctors or nurses? Or what about managers and CEOs?

    I'll note that this has been done for a long time with doctors and nurses. I've read of immigrant Indian medical professionals in the late 80s, IIRC. Education for managers and CEOs is in great oversupply. That's not the restriction on those careers.