Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Politics
posted by Fnord666 on Saturday September 30 2017, @05:03PM   Printer-friendly
from the another-brick-in-the-wall dept.

Submitted via IRC for guy_

China has told North Korean companies operating in its territory to close down as it implements United Nations sanctions against the reclusive state.

The companies will be shut by early January. Joint Chinese and North Korean ventures will also be forced to close.

China, Pyongyang's only major ally, has already banned textile trade and limited oil exports.

The move is part of an international response to North Korea's sixth and most powerful nuclear test.

The UN Security Council, of which China is a member, voted unanimously for fresh sanctions on 11 September.

China's commerce ministry said it had set a deadline of 120 days from the passing of the resolution for any North Korean companies within its borders to close.

Source: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-41431057


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 30 2017, @07:16PM (5 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 30 2017, @07:16PM (#575347)

    My assumption for this is:

    <sarcasm>You know what they say about assumptions...</sarcasm> Just sayin' :P

    - Kim isn't insane (or at least not stupid), and realizes that he is a pawn in a play for power/influene in Asia

    I don't know about this one. Insanity can often make people act stupid. A a stupid sane person and a smart crazy person will often times make the same stupid choices. In NK's case one of those choices is "Do we push The Button?" They don't think to the part that involves "If we push the button Pyongyang will evaporate in the counterattack."

    - Trump does realize this as well but would prefer to be able to take NK himself instead of letting it fall to China should something go wrong.

    The Orange Toddler doesn't realize much of anything, least of all what role NK actually plays in Asia. If it doesn't say "Trump" on the side of it or directly involve his glorification he doesn't know, doesn't care, and thinks he's doing a better job than anyone else could possibly hope do with it. When trying to figure out what Trump would do, ask yourself "what would a five year old do?" You'll never go wrong with that, as he has the intellect and temperament of a typical young child.

  • (Score: 3, Informative) by fyngyrz on Saturday September 30 2017, @07:26PM (4 children)

    by fyngyrz (6567) on Saturday September 30 2017, @07:26PM (#575351) Journal

    When trying to figure out what Trump would do, ask yourself "what would a five year old do?" You'll never go wrong with that, as he has the intellect and temperament of a typical young child.

    When trying to figure out what Trump would do, ask yourself "what would a five year old who has not been adequately socialized and has not even a semblance of compassion do?" You'll never go wrong with that, as he has the intellect and temperament of an atypical young child.

    FTFY.

    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by nekomata on Saturday September 30 2017, @08:25PM (3 children)

      by nekomata (5432) on Saturday September 30 2017, @08:25PM (#575367)

      To you (and the parent), I don't get how you can come to the conclusion that Trump is stupid. Do you think making billions and becoming the president of the United States does not require intellect? Require skill? Do you believe the way he portraits himself in public view is genuine? I'm not arguing that he can't be a psychopath or whatever, but stupid?

      Is this a case of "I dislike him so much that I'm not willing to even consider anything that does not agree with my emotional stance"? Or do you, by analysis of what he (and the likes of Kim) have achieved, have come to a conclusion based on actual data?

      Intelligence does not exclusively exist in academia, you can be quite 'rough around the edges', have no manners, little knowledge and still be intelligent. But please do not assume I'm a supporter of either person, I'm just looking at this and finding 'the happenings' to be quite entertaining, as well as fascinating.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 30 2017, @08:43PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 30 2017, @08:43PM (#575376)

        You are assuming those posts were made by someone with an anti-Trump agenda/opinion. It could be a case of associating the opposition with drivel/stupidity.

      • (Score: 5, Insightful) by fyngyrz on Saturday September 30 2017, @11:58PM

        by fyngyrz (6567) on Saturday September 30 2017, @11:58PM (#575408) Journal

        To you (and the parent), I don't get how you can come to the conclusion that Trump is stupid.

        Trump "graduated" from an Ivy League college. Keep that in mind, and consider: He utilizes an extremely limited vocabulary which one might be unsurprised to find in someone who has not been well educated. He puts that vocabulary together in ways that are ignorant and clumsy... to be kind. He spells poorly. He doesn't even know which words to write. He wrote that a Chinese seizure of a ship was "unpresidented", for instance; another, he wrote that he was "honered to serve." But there are more indicators than his inability to use English well. He doesn't deal with intelligence reports, requiring a bulleted, trivialized summary instead. He is unable to control his behavior, or his remarks. He lies, and he lies when he's going to get caught within minutes. His remarks are replete with verbal tics ("believe me", "trust me", "this is the very best", etc.) that any intelligent person who wasn't actually drug- or psychosis-addled would eliminate at least as soon as they were pointed out, and likely sooner, since they are unmistakable tells that lies are incoming.

        I won't even count the damage the things he endorses will do to the environment, and so directly impact his children, and their children. Perhaps he doesn't like his children. I'm totally on board with that. I don't like them either, at least the adult ones.

        Do you think making billions and becoming the president of the United States does not require intellect? Require skill?

        Well, that's two questions. To the first, making billions: Money makes more money, and particularly if you're playing with it during a real-estate boom. Trump started out with (at least) seven figures from his father, contacts all across the wealthy, accountants, and so forth. Pretty much anyone can earn under those circumstances. It's getting the start that's so difficult. Trump was given his start. So yes, you can do it if you're not smart.

        To the second, becoming president: Yes, you can definitely do it if you're not smart. Trump's not even the first to do so recently. Bush II did it just a few elections ago, and that man is anything but smart. Winning an election is essentially a process of convincing voters. To that end, the party, the campaign planners, the co-conspiratorsworkers, the donors, the rich people behind the scenes, they all facilitate the election. The candidate postures and preens, and the voters do whatever they want (and sometimes, the electoral college then does what the plurality of voters didn't want, as we saw with Trump's election.)

        Intelligence does not exclusively exist in academia, you can be quite 'rough around the edges', have no manners, little knowledge and still be intelligent.

        This is true. However, Trump is not a person who came up rough. He came up through the formal education system (he went to Fordham University, a Jesuit school in the Bronx, for two years, then transferred to the University of Pennsylvania from which he boughtobtained a bachelor's degree), and he came up surrounded by other rich folk. None of that rubbed off on him in any detectable way – his use of language is grade school level, and a lousy grade school at that. He acts the buffoon at every turn. Hence, I conclude without much doubt at all that he is, most likely, a buffoon.

        I would also point out that you can skip the entire school process – as I did - and end up with a reasonable command of the English language. That, I dare venture, might be an indicator of intelligence. Perhaps. :)

        There's more. A lot more, actually. But those are some of the high points as I see them.

      • (Score: 1) by rylyeh on Sunday October 01 2017, @06:53AM

        by rylyeh (6726) <{kadath} {at} {gmail.com}> on Sunday October 01 2017, @06:53AM (#575492)

        "Get me! - Roger Stone" Roger Stone was the #1 political campaign adviser to Drumpf, and the one who got him elected. It's on Netflix.

        Check it out. You'll understand why Drumpf had nothing to do with his 'victory' over the popular vote.

        Also this bankrupt ass*ole had to go to Russia to find creditors, 'cause he defaulted on every lender in the western world that lent to him. Hence the Balalaika (Russian - if you don't know the reference) 'strings' attached.

        --
        "a vast crenulate shell wherein rode the grey and awful form of primal Nodens, Lord of the Great Abyss."