The last step to render I:8:11 a dead letter is currently being debated in a federal appeal.
Trump Justice Department: Wars are off limits to court review
A Trump administration attorney said Friday that federal courts cannot evaluate whether a president is waging an illegal war, even if the war clearly has no grounding in a congressional authorization of force and someone directly impacted sues.
The claim was made during oral arguments in an appeal filed by Nathan Michael Smith, a now-former Army intelligence analyst who sued last year claiming former President Barack Obama was illegally fighting Islamic State terrorists without an authorization for use of military force, or AUMF, from Congress.
[...] "What if the president were to initiate hostilities with a nation or organization that wasn't plausibly within these AUMFs, would that be subject to review?" Griffith asked.
"No, I think, is the short answer. No," said Thomas Byron, an experienced Justice Department attorney.
(Score: 3, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 29 2017, @12:31PM
Because accusing someone of bigotry has been the go-to tactic for the Control Left for a generation or two. They can't be bothered to try to debate his stances, so they've decided that the Democrat party platform is that Trump is bad 'cuz Trump.
Of course, given that Bernie supporters loved Trump's tax plan when they were told Bernie was the one who came up with it [freebeacon.com], it's questionable just how much of an actual debate they could come up with in the first place.