Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Politics
posted by mrpg on Monday November 20 2017, @11:59PM   Printer-friendly
from the life-energy-and-momentum dept.

Source:

Nebraska regulators approved an alternative route Monday for the proposed Keystone XL pipeline. It was the last major regulatory hurdle facing project operator TransCanada Corp., though opponents say another round of federal approval may now be needed.

The Nebraska Public Service Commission's ruling was on the Nebraska route TransCanada has proposed to complete the $8 billion, 1,179-mile (1,897-kilometer) pipeline to deliver oil from Alberta, Canada, to Texas Gulf Coast refineries. The proposed Keystone XL route would cross parts of Montana, South Dakota and most of Nebraska to Steele City, Nebraska.

The long-delayed project was rejected by President Barack Obama in 2015, citing concerns about carbon pollution. President Donald Trump revived it in March, approving a permit.

[...] The five-member Nebraska Public Service Commission was forbidden by law from factoring pipeline safety or the risk of spills into its decision because pipeline safety is a federal responsibility. So, it couldn't take into account a spill of 210,000 gallons (790,000 liters) of oil on the existing Keystone pipeline in South Dakota announced on Thursday.

Also at Alternative Keystone XL route gets approved in Nebraska


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Goghit on Tuesday November 21 2017, @06:42PM

    by Goghit (6530) on Tuesday November 21 2017, @06:42PM (#599778)

    Some of us on the coast would like to see more refining capacity in Alberta as well - there'd be less opposition to piping refined products to tankers out here than that unrefined dil-bit shit.

    Unfortunately it's expensive to build and run refineries for bitumen and the Koch Bros want to get the chunk of Alberta tar sands they own to their refineries in the Gulf, so that's never going to happen. Personally, I'd like to see refineries in Alberta and the tar sand extraction operations run on nuclear heated steam. Bonus points if the reactor is sited over a geological fault somewhere close to Calgary so they can gain a better appreciation of how we feel about tankers out here.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2