A major oil-by-rail terminal proposed on the Columbia River in Washington state poses a potential risk of oil spills, train accidents and longer emergency response times due to road traffic, an environmental study has found.
Many of the risks could be decreased with certain mitigation measures, but the study released Tuesday outlined four areas where it said the impacts are significant and cannot be avoided.
The study said that while "the likelihood of occurrence of the potential for oil spills may be low, the consequences of the events could be severe."
[...] The study identified the four risks that could not be avoided as train accidents, the emergency response delays, negative impacts of the project on low-income communities and the possibility that an earthquake would damage the facility's dock and cause an oil spill.
Washington state panel outlines risk of oil-by-rail terminal
(Score: 1) by khallow on Saturday November 25 2017, @04:24PM (4 children)
Or accept the significant impacts. Trade offs always exist for nontrivial decisions.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 25 2017, @08:01PM (3 children)
What significant impacts? The oil isn't being drilled for in Washington and it's being moved to the port in order to export. Why on Earth should the people of Washington be stuck with the risk associated with that stuff moving through our state, risking our bodies of water, just so that it can be burned overseas?
In what universe does that make any sense at all?
(Score: 2) by jmorris on Saturday November 25 2017, @08:16PM
So what else does Washington State plan to trade the Chinese for their trinkets? You want that iPhone or don't ya?
(Score: 1) by khallow on Saturday November 25 2017, @09:41PM (1 child)
Because the transportation infrastructure of Washington state takes a bit off the top as middlemen in this trade.
(Score: 2) by frojack on Saturday November 25 2017, @10:37PM
As do the refineries in Washington,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petroleum_refining_in_Washington_state [wikipedia.org]
Most of their output is for domestic consumption.
No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.