Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Politics
posted by janrinok on Thursday December 07 2017, @01:05AM   Printer-friendly
from the and-a-polite-discussion-ensued... dept.

Recently published in Journal of Social and Political Psychology by Thomas F. Pettigrew seeks to understand the psychological profile of Trump supporters:

The Trump movement is not singular within the United States (the Know Nothing movement in the 1850s, the Wallace movement in the 1960s, and the more recent Tea Party Movement). Moreover, other democracies have seen similar movements (e.g., Austria's Freedom Party, Belgium's Vlaams Blok, France's National Front, Germany's Alternative for Germany Party (AfD), and Britain's U.K. Independence Party (UKIP).

In virtually all these cases, the tinder especially involved male nativists and populists who were less educated than the general population. But this core was joined by other types of voters as well. Five highly interrelated characteristics stand out that are central to a social psychological analysis – authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, outgroup prejudice, the absence of intergroup contact and relative deprivation.No one factor describes Trump's supporters. But an array of factors – many of them reflecting five major social psychological phenomena can help to account for this extraordinary political event: authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, prejudice, relative deprivation, and intergroup contact.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by FatPhil on Thursday December 07 2017, @03:37PM (2 children)

    by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Thursday December 07 2017, @03:37PM (#606824) Homepage
    Democracy begins with a miracle (it's not dominant over any other prevailing system apart from anarchy).

    Once democracy has begun, can it *continue* with the help of you being active.

    The USA's approximation to democracy is so dysfunctional it's naive to call it a democracy. With the dysfunctional electoral college system as it currently is, it's not even a democratically elected oligarchy. And you're the poster-child for Duverger's law to boot (in large part due to the flaws in the system that make it undemocratic), which almost guarantees the stable equilibrium.

    The USA needs the miracle still. (Ever worse and worse presidents might be the impetus required, but you're only at the President Comacho level currently, there's plenty worse possible.)
    --
    Life is a precious commodity. A wise investor would get rid of it when it has the highest value.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 07 2017, @09:25PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 07 2017, @09:25PM (#607001)

    The USA's approximation to democracy is so dysfunctional it's naive to call it a democracy

    Amen.
    I find the term Oligarchy to be appropriate.
    It's the way the place was set up.
    ...with just enough of a veneer to convince the suckers that they count.
    The term The 99 Percent, coined by Occupy, puts a fine point on how much power Joe Average has--if he'd use it collectively against his actual oppressors.

    Duverger's law

    Didn't know that it had a name.
    Yeah. You may have seen me advocating here for Ranked Choice Voting.
    All the really great places have that.
    Way more democratic.

    President Comacho

    s/Comacho/Camacho
    ...but, yeah.

    you're

    I keep forgetting that you're in .fi.

    -- OriginalOwner_ [soylentnews.org]

    • (Score: 3, Interesting) by FatPhil on Friday December 08 2017, @07:13AM

      by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Friday December 08 2017, @07:13AM (#607118) Homepage
      I left Finland 7 yars ago, but still work for a Finnish company, so spend a lot of time there. I'm now in Estonia. However, socio-politically Estonia modelled itself a lot on the Finnish model, which was one reason it became as successful as it did so quickly.

      One thing I like about Estonia is that, at least for municipal elections, a lot of the time when you vote for person X, and they reach a mandate level, they you are represented by person X precisely, not just some party person X has chosen to affiliate themself to. A full 43% of the representatives are independent or ad hoc coalitions (representing 27% of the voters)
          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estonian_municipal_elections,_2017

      Duverger's Law still hasn't kicked in here, even though the 5% cutoff for any representation at all (in Tallinn, with 79 seats, even 2% of the vote is surely enough to prove there should be representation) does encourage it somewhat. (I'm one of those idealists who believes that if 2% of Tallinn's population is extremist racist whackjobs then, as long as they don't interfere with the smooth-running of democracy, they should be represented.}
      --
      Life is a precious commodity. A wise investor would get rid of it when it has the highest value.