Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
Politics
posted by martyb on Thursday February 08 2018, @11:20AM   Printer-friendly
from the it's-a-right-wing-thing dept.

Fake News Sharing in US is a Right-Wing Thing, Says Study

A study by researchers at Oxford University concluded that sharing fake and junk news is much more prevalent amongst Trump supporters and other people with hard right-wing tendencies.

From the Guardian:

The study, from the university's "computational propaganda project", looked at the most significant sources of "junk news" shared in the three months leading up to Donald Trump's first State of the Union address this January, and tried to find out who was sharing them and why.

"On Twitter, a network of Trump supporters consumes the largest volume of junk news, and junk news is the largest proportion of news links they share," the researchers concluded. On Facebook, the skew was even greater. There, "extreme hard right pages – distinct from Republican pages – share more junk news than all the other audiences put together.

Polarization, Partisanship and Junk News Consumption over Social Media in the US

What kinds of social media users read junk news? We examine the distribution of the most significant sources of junk news in the three months before President Donald Trump's first State of the Union Address. Drawing on a list of sources that consistently publish political news and information that is extremist, sensationalist, conspiratorial, masked commentary, fake news and other forms of junk news, we find that the distribution of such content is unevenly spread across the ideological spectrum. We demonstrate that (1) on Twitter, a network of Trump supporters shares the widest range of known junk news sources and circulates more junk news than all the other groups put together; (2) on Facebook, extreme hard right pages—distinct from Republican pages—share the widest range of known junk news sources and circulate more junk news than all the other audiences put together; (3) on average, the audiences for junk news on Twitter share a wider range of known junk news sources than audiences on Facebook's public pages.

http://comprop.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/polarization-partisanship-and-junk-news/

[Ed. note: page is loading very slowly; try a direct link to the actual report (pdf). --martyb]


Original Submission #1Original Submission #2

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Informative) by DeathMonkey on Thursday February 08 2018, @05:24PM (5 children)

    by DeathMonkey (1380) on Thursday February 08 2018, @05:24PM (#635044) Journal

    It is a leftist fantasy that conservatives are holding all the power.

    Most of us leftists realize that the Republicans are reactionaries, not conservatives. But, they do hold all the power right now.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=1, Informative=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 2) by cubancigar11 on Thursday February 08 2018, @07:44PM (4 children)

    by cubancigar11 (330) on Thursday February 08 2018, @07:44PM (#635152) Homepage Journal

    Conservatives don't hold any power. The billionaires and their bitches do.

    • (Score: 3, Touché) by Azuma Hazuki on Thursday February 08 2018, @08:39PM (2 children)

      by Azuma Hazuki (5086) on Thursday February 08 2018, @08:39PM (#635184) Journal

      Thing is, Kyuubey, most people who hear "conservative" in this milieu then think of what is properly called reactionary. This may not have been intentionally set up, but it sure seems to be a convenient little kink in reality that stops *actual* lower-case-C-conservatives from noticing that their supposed fellow-travelers actually aren't anything like them.

      Conservative-with-a-lowercase-C values are actually showing up more in the Democrats than the Republicans. Take everyone's favorite political football, "family values." Which party is advocating policies that allow for families to stay together, make enough money to subsist on, and thereby raise well-adjusted children and by extension keep society running smoothly? I'll give you a hint: neither of the *really* are, but it's the Republican party that seems hellbent on creating a massive underclass of dysfunctional poverty-stricken single mothers and stunted, malnourished, lead-poisoned (see Flint, MI) children.

      --
      I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
      • (Score: -1, Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 08 2018, @11:57PM (1 child)

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 08 2018, @11:57PM (#635291)

        the Republican party that seems hellbent on creating a massive underclass of dysfunctional poverty-stricken single mothers

        Not [politifact.com] true [realclearpolitics.com]

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 09 2018, @01:17AM

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 09 2018, @01:17AM (#635333)

          Worst supporting articles I've seen in a long time. I would also like to call your attention to Azuma's statement that neither Ds or Rs really do much as they are both quite corrupt and out to make the rich richer. Republicans do nothing to support real family values, however they sure do push religious bullshit that causes divisions in society and they actively try to reduce social safety nets.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 09 2018, @06:08AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 09 2018, @06:08AM (#635407)

      As Azauma has noted, it's the (Neoliberal) [soylentnews.org] Democrats who resemble Conservatives these days.

      The Republican agenda is RADICAL, which is the OPPOSITE of "Conservative".
      Azauma also correctly identified GOP's position as REACTIONARY (wanting to have the status quo ante, i.e. returning to the condition of an earlier era: no women voting; only land owners voting; no empowered "middle class"; etc.).

      Now, as to your assertion, go ahead and link to a Lamestream Media outlet that has had someone on in, oh, let's say the last 40 years who expressed a Socialist (Leftist) viewpoint e.g. empowering The Working Class via ownership.

      It doesn't happen.
      On his weekly radio program, Ralph Nader asks his -Progressive- (not even Leftist) guests if they have been allowed on any national outlet [google.com] addressing what they are discussing with Ralph.
      The answer is always NO.
      That ended for sure with the killing of The Fairness Doctrine by Reagan/Mark Fowler in 1987.

      Anyone who wants to get a Non-Conservative/Non-Reactionary viewpoint, has to go to Non-Lamestream media.
      Your conception of what power is is quaint (as is your conception of "Conservative").

      -- OriginalOwner_ [soylentnews.org]