Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Politics
posted by takyon on Tuesday July 24 2018, @11:00AM   Printer-friendly
from the fault-lines dept.

California Supreme Court blocks proposal to split state in 3 from November ballot

The California Supreme Court on Wednesday blocked a proposal that would split the state into three from the November ballot.

The court wrote that it took the step "because significant questions have been raised regarding the proposition's validity and because we conclude that the potential harm in permitting the measure to remain on the ballot outweighs the potential harm in delaying the proposition to a future election."

Last week, an environmental group sued to have the measure removed from the ballot. To substantially alter the state's governance under the California constitution, the group argued, a constitutional convention would need to be called -- and that requires a supermajority of both houses of the state's legislature. A ballot initiative, the group said, was constitutionally insufficient.

See also: Billionaire Tim Draper Abandons Push to Split California Into Three

Asked if he would continue fighting for the measure, Draper said in an email to Bloomberg News that "the same six lawyers are going to make the decision. What would be the point? They have just proven that California has a runaway government and the people have no say."

Draper, a venture capitalist, sought the initiative because he said the world's fifth-largest economy is "nearly ungovernable" under the current system. Asked if there was anything else he planned to do to make the government more accountable, he said he was "still recovering from the shock."

Previously: Proposal to Divide California Into Three States Could Land on the November Ballot
Ballot Measure to Split California Into Three States Will Appear on the November 2018 Ballot


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by Arik on Tuesday July 24 2018, @08:04PM (2 children)

    by Arik (4543) on Tuesday July 24 2018, @08:04PM (#711872) Journal
    "The electoral college is allowed to make anyone they choose president."

    Working as designed, so no, that's not proof at all.
    --
    If laughter is the best medicine, who are the best doctors?
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by HiThere on Tuesday July 24 2018, @10:17PM (1 child)

    by HiThere (866) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday July 24 2018, @10:17PM (#711984) Journal

    When the claim is that the design is broken, "Working as designed" is not proof that it isn't broken. OTOH, I'm not certain to what extent that claim is correct. In order to judge that, I'd need to compare it against the proposed fix.

    --
    Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.
    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Arik on Tuesday July 24 2018, @10:27PM

      by Arik (4543) on Tuesday July 24 2018, @10:27PM (#711990) Journal
      And the 'proof' advanced would need to directly challenge the design itself, rather than simply pointing at it.
      --
      If laughter is the best medicine, who are the best doctors?