Michael Kovrig, former Canadian diplomat, reportedly arrested in China
A former Canadian diplomat has reportedly been arrested in China. The International Crisis Group said Tuesday it's aware of reports that its North East Asia senior adviser Michael Kovrig has been detained.
The Brussels-based non-governmental organization said in a statement it's doing everything possible to obtain additional information about Kovrig's whereabouts and that it will work to ensure his prompt release.
The Globe and Mail in Toronto and the Canadian Broadcasting Corp. reported the arrest, citing unnamed sources.
Reports of Kovrig's detention come after China warned Canada of consequences for its recent arrest of Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou at Vancouver's airport. It's unclear if there's any link between the cases.
Some Chinese companies ban iPhones, require Huawei after CFO's arrest: report
Some Chinese companies are banning iPhones and requiring that their employees use Huawei products following the arrest of Huawei's chief financial officer, according to a new Yahoo News report. Meng Wanzhou, the CFO of Chinese telecom giant Huawei, was arrested by Canadian authorities last Saturday at the request of the U.S. after allegedly violating trade sanctions against Iran. Chinese officials have strongly protested Meng's detention.
Now, Chinese companies are promoting Huawei and barring Apple, an American company. Menpad, an LCD display maker and Huawei supplier, on Monday said it will punish employees who buy iPhones with a fine equivalent to the American smartphone's market price, the South China Morning Post reported. It also vowed that the company will no longer buy American products, including office supplies and computers, and will offer a 15 percent subsidy for employees who are buying Huawei phones, according to the Post.
Japan's top three telcos to exclude Huawei, ZTE network equipment: Kyodo
Japan's big three telecom operators plan not to use current equipment and upcoming fifth-generation (5G) gear from China's Huawei Technologies Co Ltd and ZTE Corp, Kyodo News reported on Monday.
The news, for which Kyodo did not cite sources, comes at a time of heightened scrutiny of Chinese tech firms by Washington and some prominent allies over ties to the Chinese government, driven by concerns they could be used by Beijing for spying. Last week sources told Reuters that Japan planned to ban government purchases of equipment from Huawei and ZTE to ensure strength in its defences against intelligence leaks and cyber attacks.
See also: How Meng Wanzhou's Arrest Might Backfire
Previously: Canada Arrests Huawei's Global Chief Financial Officer in Vancouver
Arrest of Huawei Executive Causing Discontent Among Chinese Elites
Related: New Law Bans U.S. Government from Buying Equipment from Chinese Telecom Giants ZTE and Huawei
Australia Bans China's Huawei (and maybe ZTE) from 5G Mobile Network Project
Washington Asks Allies to Drop Huawei
(Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday December 12 2018, @02:53PM (2 children)
The key word is "afraid". And there were plenty of wars between the US and USSR, fought by proxy powers, that didn't end in nuclear war. Not saying it's a great idea, but just noting that even in worst case, the fear is overblown.
And those people would be?
China has to in order to survive. But as they get wealthier, they'll get less interested in self-sacrifice.
In other words, his status as "American" didn't protect him from the laws of the locals. Meanwhile, if he had been arrested by India, he likely would have been appropriately punished. Nor is this "related news".
Found the story [eurasiareview.com] (which notes that the victims came up on the American in a typical attack approach). Meanwhile a number of Americans have been murdered, kidnapped, etc with similar lack of consequence (here [cbsnews.com], here [cbsnews.com], here [dailymail.co.uk], and here [wikipedia.org]. Maybe this supposed immunity of Americans is just due to Pakistan not enforcing well its laws on murder than the nationality of the murderer?
Stupid thing to say. Was the attempt to capture/kill Hitler by the Soviets authorized by the German government? Why would the US wait for authorization before killing a military target protected by the host country? Here, there's evidence that bin Laden was protected by Pakistani intelligence (working with the local tribes allied with Al Qaeda) which has often worked at cross-purposes with the rest of the Pakistani government. So not telling Pakistan means not telling the people protecting bin Laden. It's standard intelligence 101 - don't tell your foes what you are about to do. That's quite legal, you know.
Uh huh. Pakistan's problems with rule of law is not a US problem.
One can dream, amirite? I wonder why people imagining all these bad things, seem so hopeful about it?
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 12 2018, @06:30PM (1 child)
Reading is hard, I know. Why read or use brain when you can start an argument like a retard.
(Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday December 12 2018, @09:53PM