Last week we wrote a critical analysis of Elizabeth Warren's big plan to break up "big tech." As we noted, there was a lot in the plan that was nonsensical, unsupported by the facts or just plain confused. We'll be talking more about some of these ideas a lot over the next few years I imagine (stay tuned), but there was one line in Warren's plan that deserved a separate post: it appears that a part of Warren's big attack on big tech... is to give a massive handout to Hollywood. Here's the line:
We must help America's content creators — from local newspapers and national magazines to comedians and musicians — keep more of the value their content generates, rather than seeing it scooped up by companies like Google and Facebook.
That may sound rather basic and lacking any details, but what's notable about it is that the language reflects -- almost exactly -- the language used in the EU in support of the absolute worst parts of the EU Copyright Directive (specifically, Article 11 and Article 13). For example, this Q & A page by the Legislative Affairs Committee of the EU Parliament uses quite similar language:
The draft directive intends to oblige giant internet platforms and news aggregators (like YouTube or GoogleNews) to pay content creators (artists/musicians/actors and news houses and their journalists) what they truly owe them;
Why, that sounds quite familiar. Indeed, Warren's announcement even uses "keep more of the value their content generates," which appears to be a reference to the completely made up notion of a "value gap" between what internet platforms make and what they should be paying artists.
(Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 21 2019, @04:17AM (4 children)
Squaw fetchum wood.
(Score: 1, Flamebait) by The Mighty Buzzard on Thursday March 21 2019, @04:34AM (3 children)
She hasn't been in politics long enough for that. She's going to need more bribe money to get the guys liquored up if she wants any wood.
My rights don't end where your fear begins.
(Score: 4, Touché) by hemocyanin on Thursday March 21 2019, @05:26AM (2 children)
She's been in politics a long time and because the DNC is a Hollywood subsidiary, she will of course be toeing the party line.
(Score: 2) by bzipitidoo on Thursday March 21 2019, @07:25AM (1 child)
The Democrats have a long history of being in bed with Hollywood. And Hollywood thinks copyright is not extreme enough. They really would like to have the death penalty imposed for piracy. This plank in favor of extreme copyright is one of if not my top complaint about the Democratic Party.
If this report is true, it's sad to hear that Warren is under their thumb. I tend to believe it. Oh well, there are lots of other politicians vying for the Democratic nomination.
(Score: 2) by Gaaark on Thursday March 21 2019, @10:19AM
Yes....I thought she might be one of the better politicians.
But I'm Canadian, so haven't followed her much.
--- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---