Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
Politics
posted by janrinok on Monday January 27 2020, @05:46PM   Printer-friendly

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

Political polarization among Americans has grown rapidly in the last 40 years—more than in Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia or Germany—a phenomenon possibly due to increased racial division, the rise of partisan cable news and changes in the composition of the Democratic and Republican parties.

That's according to new research co-authored by Jesse Shapiro, a professor of political economy at Brown University. The study, conducted alongside Stanford University economists Levi Boxell and Matthew Gentzkow, was released on Monday, Jan. 20, as a National Bureau of Economic Research working paper.

In the study, Shapiro and colleagues present the first ever multi-nation evidence on long-term trends in "affective polarization"—a phenomenon in which citizens feel more negatively toward other political parties than toward their own. They found that in the U.S., affective polarization has increased more dramatically since the late 1970s than in the eight other countries they examined—the U.K., Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Germany, Switzerland, Norway and Sweden.

"A lot of analysis on polarization is focused on the U.S., so we thought it could be interesting to put the U.S. in context and see whether it is part of a global trend or whether it looks more exceptional," Shapiro said. "We found that the trend in the U.S. is indeed exceptional."

Using data from four decades of public opinion surveys conducted in the nine countries, the researchers used a so-called "feeling thermometer" to rate attitudes on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 reflected no negative feelings toward other parties. They found that in 1978, the average American rated the members of their own political party 27 points higher than members of the other major party. By 2016, Americans were rating their own party 45.9 points higher than the other party, on average. In other words, negative feelings toward members of the other party compared to one's own party increased by an average of 4.8 points per decade.

The researchers found that polarization had also risen in Canada, New Zealand and Switzerland in the last 40 years, but to a lesser extent. In the U.K., Australia, Germany, Norway and Sweden, polarization decreased.

More information: Levi Boxell et al, Cross-Country Trends in Affective Polarization, (2020). DOI: 10.3386/w26669


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by mendax on Monday January 27 2020, @09:40PM (7 children)

    by mendax (2840) on Monday January 27 2020, @09:40PM (#949587)

    Is it a sign of polarization for me to think that Trump is a truly evil and wicked person? Whatever happened to the sense of morality? I'm just naïve I guess.

    --
    It's really quite a simple choice: Life, Death, or Los Angeles.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Monday January 27 2020, @09:57PM (6 children)

    by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Monday January 27 2020, @09:57PM (#949600) Journal

    It may not be a sign of polarization. It may be just stating what anyone can see. However, there are two extreme poles. One pole sees Trump as the antichrist. The other pole sees him as a god above all other gods. You probably end up pigeonholing yourself into one of the two polar extremes. Even if your observation is quite reasonable.

    Or maybe, one of those poles is reasonable and the other is not?

    --
    Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 28 2020, @06:08AM (4 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 28 2020, @06:08AM (#949932)

      However, there are two extreme poles. One pole sees Trump as the antichrist. The other pole sees him as a god above all other gods.

      That is exactly the sort of polarization the article is about.

      I don't think Trump is a God above all men. I don't think he is Satan and Hitler merged into Sauron.
      I don't think he is the smartest guy on the planet, but I wonder how dumb the Left would have to be to lose to someone as stupid as they claim he is.

      He the most polarizing politician I have ever seen. His ability to send the Left into incoherent frothing rage is amazing. They then turn that rage on anyone they perceive as his supporters. The people attacked (supporters or not) then retaliate, quite often by doing or advocating whatever they think will rile up the Left even more. It is just a cycle of trolling vs incoherent anger now. It is almost impossible to have a rational discussion.

      • (Score: 2) by Azuma Hazuki on Wednesday January 29 2020, @01:32AM (2 children)

        by Azuma Hazuki (5086) on Wednesday January 29 2020, @01:32AM (#950387) Journal

        There *is* no left in the US; the Democrats are a center-right corporatist party. They're also divided right down the middle, with a small set of actual centrists (Sanders, Ocasio-Cortes, etc) on one side and what are essentially Reagan Republicans on the other, which side unfortunately also has all the power and money.

        Honestly, the Democrats are doing a fine job tearing themselves apart without any outside help. How could it be otherwise, when there's less distance between Clinton and Romney than Clinton and Sanders?

        --
        I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 29 2020, @08:11AM (1 child)

          by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 29 2020, @08:11AM (#950553)

          Left is a relative position not an absolute.
          The Democrats might be to the Right of the rest of the world, but they are Left of the Republicans.

          • (Score: 2) by Azuma Hazuki on Wednesday January 29 2020, @03:34PM

            by Azuma Hazuki (5086) on Wednesday January 29 2020, @03:34PM (#950665) Journal

            True but irrelevant, mostly because 1) we live in a global age now and 2) the "relative" aspect only exists on a pre-existing collection of absolutes. You may as well say that if you only look at the colors red, orange, and yellow, yellow is blue-violet "relative to red." You can't make that claim without knowing that there *is* a blue-violet.

            And yes, there is a real, absolute set of far-left to far-right. Absolute far left would be anarcho-communism, and absolute far right would be something like Saudi Arabia.

            --
            I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
      • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Wednesday January 29 2020, @02:53PM

        by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday January 29 2020, @02:53PM (#950644) Journal

        Well said.

        --
        Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.
    • (Score: 4, Touché) by Azuma Hazuki on Wednesday January 29 2020, @01:30AM

      by Azuma Hazuki (5086) on Wednesday January 29 2020, @01:30AM (#950384) Journal

      Trump actually fits the profile of the antichrist shockingly well. Open up your Bible to Revelation and read it very slowly and carefully, and at every verse that describes what the antichrist will do or how acts, compare to the entirety of the Trump administration.

      --
      I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...