Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Politics
posted by martyb on Tuesday July 07 2020, @12:48PM   Printer-friendly
from the could-just-ask-23-and-me dept.

DNA Databases in the U.S. and China Are Tools of Racial Oppression

Two major world powers, the United States and China, have both collected an enormous number of DNA samples from their citizens, the premise being that these samples will help solve crimes that might have otherwise gone unsolved. While DNA evidence can often be crucial when it comes to determining who committed a crime, researchers argue these DNA databases also pose a major threat to human rights.

In the U.S., the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has a DNA database called the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) that currently contains over 14 million DNA profiles. This database has a disproportionately high number of profiles of black men, because black Americans are arrested five times as much as white Americans. You don't even have to be convicted of a crime for law enforcement to take and store your DNA; you simply have to have been arrested as a suspect.

[...] As for China, a report that was published by the Australian Strategic Policy Institute in mid-June claims that China is operating the "world's largest police-run DNA database" as part of its powerful surveillance state. Chinese authorities have collected DNA samples from possibly as many as 70 million men since 2017, and the total database is believed to contain as many as 140 million profiles. The country hopes to collect DNA from all of its male citizens, as it argues men are most likely to commit crimes.

DNA is reportedly often collected during what are represented as free physicals, and it's also being collected from children at schools. There are reports of Chinese citizens being threatened with punishment by government officials if they refuse to give a DNA sample. Much of the DNA that's been collected has been from Uighur Muslims that have been oppressed by the Chinese government and infamously forced into concentration camps in the Xinjiang province.

Related:


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 07 2020, @01:55PM (40 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 07 2020, @01:55PM (#1017633)

    The logic of the Left leads to not going after criminals because they don't want to "oppress" them. Criminals get rights over the victims of their crimes. We have been seeing the consequences over the past month or so. More innocent people including small children die. More BLACK people die. We ALL suffer while the mob is given free reign. THAT is the true injustice.

    Note that this has all happened before (60s - 70s especially, and also 80s - early 90s).

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   -1  
       Flamebait=1, Troll=3, Insightful=2, Interesting=1, Total=7
    Extra 'Troll' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   -1  
  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 07 2020, @02:07PM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 07 2020, @02:07PM (#1017638)

    And if you dare try to defend yourself with a gun from a mob while wearing a pink polo. You are the problem and will be investigated. Not the mob that trespasses and destroys property.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 07 2020, @05:03PM (2 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 07 2020, @05:03PM (#1017767)

      One thing these ongoing riots and killings have demonstrated, is that apparently, a certain group NEEDS more policing.

      • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 07 2020, @09:14PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 07 2020, @09:14PM (#1017879)

        Not even dog whistling anymore? Fucking neo nazi shits, go back to Russia where you can stomp your boots on plenty of necks. Assuming you can catch them you fat slob.

      • (Score: 2) by Azuma Hazuki on Wednesday July 08 2020, @01:03AM

        by Azuma Hazuki (5086) on Wednesday July 08 2020, @01:03AM (#1017955) Journal

        Yeah, the white supremacists are fucking insidious...but they're not gonna GET "more policing" because they've infiltrated the policing apparatus. If anything, you could argue they were there from the start. Hell of a problem.

        --
        I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
  • (Score: 2) by legont on Tuesday July 07 2020, @02:11PM (4 children)

    by legont (4179) on Tuesday July 07 2020, @02:11PM (#1017643)

    Police are looking for two White people who painted over a Black Lives Matter mural

    https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/06/us/black-lives-matter-mural-painted-over-trnd/index.html [cnn.com]

    No comment.

    --
    "Wealth is the relentless enemy of understanding" - John Kenneth Galbraith.
    • (Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Tuesday July 07 2020, @06:34PM

      by DeathMonkey (1380) on Tuesday July 07 2020, @06:34PM (#1017813) Journal

      And? I thought vandalism matters?

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 08 2020, @04:33AM (2 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 08 2020, @04:33AM (#1018064)

      They got them [thesun.co.uk]. Charged with painting a street without a permit. (The BLM, being law-abiding Americans, had a permit.)

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 08 2020, @08:55AM (1 child)

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 08 2020, @08:55AM (#1018108)

        Score: 0 for you though. Shame reality has such a leftist bias, like you seem to.

        Shame nobody cares enough about facts to vote for you. Maybe they blew all their mod points voting up the trolls. :(

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 08 2020, @12:08PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 08 2020, @12:08PM (#1018152)

          A less than zero AC! Racist! Now, get back to towing that line.

  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by DannyB on Tuesday July 07 2020, @02:15PM (24 children)

    by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday July 07 2020, @02:15PM (#1017647) Journal

    The logic of the Left leads to not going after criminals because they don't want to "oppress" them. Criminals get rights over the victims of their crimes.

    The logic of the Right. Black person is victim of crime. Calls police. Police arrive and before any questions, handcuff black caller before questing white criminal to begin their "investigation" of why they were called here.

    --
    To transfer files: right-click on file, pick Copy. Unplug mouse, plug mouse into other computer. Right-click, paste.
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 07 2020, @02:39PM (14 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 07 2020, @02:39PM (#1017657)

      Link?

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 07 2020, @02:53PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 07 2020, @02:53PM (#1017668)

        That Australian lady who called the pigs in Minneapolis a few years back to report a crime and got gunned down. She was Black, right?

      • (Score: 3, Touché) by DannyB on Tuesday July 07 2020, @02:55PM

        by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday July 07 2020, @02:55PM (#1017672) Journal

        I provided as many links as the post to which I replied. But you can find some on YouTube.

        --
        To transfer files: right-click on file, pick Copy. Unplug mouse, plug mouse into other computer. Right-click, paste.
      • (Score: -1, Troll) by VLM on Tuesday July 07 2020, @03:04PM (3 children)

        by VLM (445) on Tuesday July 07 2020, @03:04PM (#1017682)

        Link?

        The problem with leftist politics in practice is it tries to implement macro-scale cultural-level policy based on microscale rare essentially irrelevant anecdotes or outright imaginary stuff or occasionally outright fabrications.

        It doesn't really matter if it happened at all or if in a HUGE nation of 330 million people it happened once or even 10K times, we're all gonna be subjected to the result of the imaginary belief that it happens all the time to everyone.

        • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 07 2020, @03:38PM (2 children)

          by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 07 2020, @03:38PM (#1017713)

          outright imaginary stuff or occasionally outright fabrications.

          No finer example than the white, BLM Seattle "they" that promoted themselves from gender fluid to fender fluid by partially blocking the interstate with vehicles and then standing behind the vehicles dressed in black at 1AM. There are leftists insisting this was a "white supremacist" attack even after the arrest of the black driver. Anti-psychotics are useless against this level of delusional.

          • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 07 2020, @05:23PM

            by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 07 2020, @05:23PM (#1017777)

            >> Anti-psychotics are useless against this level of delusional.

            It's a shame they emptied out the state mental hospitals in the 50s and 60s. Society used to have a place to take care of these poor damaged souls. Now they're hire as grade school teachers.

          • (Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 08 2020, @12:19AM

            by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 08 2020, @12:19AM (#1017940)

            That's some systemic racism on your part right there by making assumptions based on the color of his skin. Who says that the Black driver wasn't a white supremacist?

      • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 07 2020, @04:07PM (7 children)

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 07 2020, @04:07PM (#1017729)
        • (Score: 0, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 07 2020, @04:14PM (6 children)

          by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 07 2020, @04:14PM (#1017736)

          Ah, the one where the guy likes to hang out in the park and bait people into calling the cops on him, then film them, conveniently leaving out the provocation? Which he did this time by threatening to poison her dog?

          • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Tuesday July 07 2020, @05:57PM (3 children)

            by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday July 07 2020, @05:57PM (#1017791) Journal

            . . . in the basement of a Washington DC pizza shop . . . right?

            --
            To transfer files: right-click on file, pick Copy. Unplug mouse, plug mouse into other computer. Right-click, paste.
            • (Score: 2, Offtopic) by Captival on Wednesday July 08 2020, @12:48AM (2 children)

              by Captival (6866) on Wednesday July 08 2020, @12:48AM (#1017950)

              Bill Clinton
              Anthony Weiner
              Burns Strider
              Jeff Epstein
              Harvey Weinstein
              Tony Podesta

              Is there any male acquaintance of Hillary's who is NOT a sex creep/rapist/pedo? And you guys still want to pretend the whole thing is made up. That makes you culpable.

              • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 08 2020, @02:25AM

                by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 08 2020, @02:25AM (#1018004)

                Yeah. That basement at Comet Ping Pong is completely real.

              • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 08 2020, @09:06AM

                by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 08 2020, @09:06AM (#1018112)

                Most women in N.America have been sexually assaulted or harassed.

                Many men have assaulted.

                Doesn't mean every assaulter realized it, btw.

                you guys still want to pretend the whole thing is made up

                No, #metoo is kinda about not pretending it was made up. Epstein was going to stand trial. Now more of his cronies - from whatever walk of life or political stripe - will, with M.G. flipping.

                If you see it being ignored, you're only listening to fools or strawmen; sorry.

          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 08 2020, @02:29AM

            by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 08 2020, @02:29AM (#1018005)

            Ah, the one where the guy likes to hang out in the park and watch birds, notices a dog off the leash (despite prominent signs requiring the contrary), gets annoyed because the unleashed dog is scaring the birds away, asks the dog's owner to leash her dog, then films her as she has a meltdown culminating in a false claim that *her life* is being threatened by a (gasp!) black man.

            There. FTFY.

            Damn. You just have to go with bald-faced lies don't you? Well, for a troll like yourself, I suppose that's not surprising.

            Toodles!

          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 08 2020, @02:41AM

            by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 08 2020, @02:41AM (#1018017)
    • (Score: 0, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 07 2020, @02:54PM (8 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 07 2020, @02:54PM (#1017669)

      Logic of the Right: End all government worker unions. That way if you get police that are doing a bad job they can be fired. If you get teachers that doesn't give a shit, get rid of them. Address multiple problems that affect inner city communities with one policy change.

      VS.

      Logic of the Left: Defund the police. Some of the first civil rights issues after the Civil War was a lack of policing in black communities. Those black communities took up arms to defend themselves. Gun control started to become popular after that. We are full circle with democrat logic. For the decades democrats have controlled the inner city communities they have made zero progress in actually solving any of the problems.

      Tough sell.

      • (Score: 2) by PartTimeZombie on Tuesday July 07 2020, @09:25PM (6 children)

        by PartTimeZombie (4827) on Tuesday July 07 2020, @09:25PM (#1017884)

        Logic of the Right:

        Use race as a distraction so that poor whites have an enemy to focus on so they can justify in their own minds voting for a party that acts against their interest. See: Southern Strategy [wikipedia.org] ,War on drugs. [wikipedia.org]

        Logic of the Left:

        The US has no left, so the right needs to pretend the other right wing party is a bunch of "Radical Marxists" or whatever.

        The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.

        — John Ehrlichman, to Dan Baum[45][46][47] for Harper's Magazine[48] in 1994, about President Richard Nixon's war on drugs, declared in 1971.[49]

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 07 2020, @10:08PM (5 children)

          by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 07 2020, @10:08PM (#1017900)

          The US has no left

          Sane people keep the far-left and far-right as far from mainstream politics as possible.

          Uncanny parallels between Weather Underground / Black Panthers & Antifa / Black Lives Matter. The emerging threat in the late '60s was targeted for a reason [fbi.gov] and it's a stain on history that Huey P. Newton is remembered as anything other than a sociopathic murderer, rapist and junkie.

          • (Score: 1, Troll) by PartTimeZombie on Tuesday July 07 2020, @11:20PM (4 children)

            by PartTimeZombie (4827) on Tuesday July 07 2020, @11:20PM (#1017915)

            Weather Underground / Black Panthers & Antifa / Black Lives Matter.

            Antifa does not really exist except as another imaginary enemy for the right to use to scare the hard-of-thinking with.

            It seems to be working too.

            The Black Panthers were heroes, and ought to be celebrated as such by the second amendment people, because that is one of the rights they fought for for.

            It worked until Ronald Reagan decided guns were only for white people.

            • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 08 2020, @12:00AM (3 children)

              by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 08 2020, @12:00AM (#1017926)

              Antifa does not really exist

              LOL [discoverthenetworks.org] The development of modern Antifa is described in chapter 2 of "Antifa" - Mark Bray's anti-fascist handbook. [archive.org]

              The Black Panthers were heroes, and ought to be celebrated as such by the second amendment people, because that is one of the rights they fought for for.

              What the fuck does the second amendment have to do with murder? [salon.com] Why are so many leftist "heroes" murderers?

              • (Score: -1, Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 08 2020, @02:43AM

                by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 08 2020, @02:43AM (#1018018)

                What the fuck does the second amendment have to do with murder? [salon.com] Why are so many leftist "heroes" murderers?

                Dylann Roof is an American hero!

                #MAGA

              • (Score: 2) by PartTimeZombie on Wednesday July 08 2020, @03:51AM (1 child)

                by PartTimeZombie (4827) on Wednesday July 08 2020, @03:51AM (#1018047)

                I love your links.

                You try to prove your point by linking to some weirdo far right propaganda and think it helps your case? Hilarious.

                David Horowitz? Jesus.

                • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 08 2020, @01:23PM

                  by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 08 2020, @01:23PM (#1018182)

                  weirdo far right propaganda

                  I'm not sure Mark Bray would appreciate that characterization of his work.

                  David Horowitz? Jesus.

                  Horowitz is a former editor of radical Marxist rag Ramparts - the magazine of the 60s new left. He began distancing himself from the left after his friend was murdered. [wikipedia.org] I'm not sure Jesus had much to say on the evils of Marxism although there may be parallels to the millions of innocent people murdered after struggle sessions with the sociopathic scumbags rallying behind the "Marxist cause".

                  If you want to give a link some love, how about this by Ken Kelley? [archive.org] Former White Panther, editor of Ann Arbor Argus, [wikipedia.org] The Berkeley Barb [wikipedia.org] and Sundance magazine? Not so well known as Jesus but a verifiable contemporary and confidant of the murderous, crack-addled sociopath Huey P. Newton.

      • (Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 07 2020, @10:09PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 07 2020, @10:09PM (#1017901)

        Only to the alt-right infestation is that a tough sell, everyone else with a brain capable of empathy has no problem.

  • (Score: 2) by choose another one on Tuesday July 07 2020, @02:59PM (5 children)

    by choose another one (515) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday July 07 2020, @02:59PM (#1017678)

    > Note that this has all happened before (60s - 70s especially, and also 80s - early 90s).

    Most things, in terms of government and the mob, have in fact happened before. Those who want to cancel history and tear down the reminders of it are in fact doomed to repeat it, they know that, that is why they want to remove knowledge of history so that everyone else cannot know it in future.

    Seattle CHOP / CHAZ apparently had racially segregated zones, presumably they think that if they topple enough statues people will not know about Jim Crow Laws or Apartheid and will believe this is a good thing.

    • (Score: 0, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 07 2020, @04:08PM (3 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 07 2020, @04:08PM (#1017730)

      It is so weird that democratic ideology does seem to be gradually headed towards 'separate but equal' all over again. I mean do people not understand that this is exactly what something like a 'racially segregated safe space' is? Does really feel like the politically correct nonsense is just an effort to do the same dumb ideas as we tried in the past and pretend it might yield a different result.

      I kind of feel like we're gradually seeing another role reversal. The republican party of Lincoln was obviously a far cry from the republican party of the early to mid/late 20th century. Yet today the democratic party aiming for racial categorization if not segregation, muzzling of free speech, equality of result, and actively working to inflame racial and social tensions at any opportunity is obviously already a far cry from the democratic party of the sixties which aimed for free speech and equality of opportunity. Democrats in California are currently trying to get rid of proposition 209. [wikipedia.org] Proposition 209 is the "Prohibition Against Discrimination or Preferential. Treatment by State and Other Public Entities. Initiative Constitutional Amendment." Here is its ballot summary:

      - Prohibits the state, local governments, districts, public universities, colleges, and schools, and other government instrumentalities from discriminating against or giving preferential treatment to any individual or group in public employment, public education, or public contracting on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin.
        - Does not prohibit reasonably necessary, bona fide qualifications based on sex and actions necessary for receipt of federal funds.
        - Mandates enforcement to extent permitted by federal law.
        - Requires uniform remedies for violations. Provides for severability of provisions if invalid.

      They are literally trying to roll back discrimination protections. The democratic party is becoming such a messed up institution.

      • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 08 2020, @02:52AM (2 children)

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 08 2020, @02:52AM (#1018022)

        democratic ideology

        You should actually look at what that ideology is. It's not what you think.
        https://democrats.org/where-we-stand/party-platform/ [democrats.org]

        DNC Platform [wikipedia.org]:

        Economic positions

        Equal economic opportunity and a base social safety net provided by the welfare state and strong labor unions have historically been at the heart of Democratic economic policy.[8] The party pursues a mixed economy, albeit with more government intervention and regulation in the economy.[13] Democrats generally support a progressive tax system, higher minimum wages, social security, universal health care, public education, and public housing.[8] They also support infrastructure development and government-sponsored employment programs in an effort to achieve economic development and job creation, while stimulating private sector job creation.[14] Also, however, since the 1990s, the party has occasionally supported centrist economic reforms, which cut the size of government and reduced market regulations.[15] The party has continuously rejected laissez-faire economics instead favoring a Social Market Economy to ensure a true Free Market and equality of opportunity

        Minimum wage
        See also: United States minimum wage

        Democrats favor raising the minimum wage and believe that all Americans have the right to a fair wage. They call for a $15.00/hour national minimum wage and believe that the minimum wage should be adjusted regularly.[21] The Fair Minimum Wage Act of 2007 was an early component of the party's agenda during the 110th Congress. In 2006, Democrats supported six state ballot initiatives to increase the minimum wage; all six initiatives passed.[22]

        Health care

        Democrats call for "affordable and quality health care," and many advocate on expanding government intervention in this area. They favor a movement toward universal health care in a variety of forms to address the rising costs of modern health insurance. Democratic politicians like Representatives John Conyers and John Dingell have called for a single-payer program or Medicare for All. The Progressive Democrats of America, a group operating inside the Democratic Party, has made single-payer universal health care one of their primary policy goals.[23] The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, signed into law by President Barack Obama on March 23, 2010, has been one of the most significant pushes for universal health care to become a reality. As of April 2014, more than 10 million Americans have enrolled in healthcare coverage since the Affordable Care Act was launched.[24]

        Education

        Democrats favor improving public education by raising school standards and reforming the head start program. They also support universal preschool and expanding access to primary education (some Democrats who support this through charter schools). They call for slashes in student loan debt and support reforms to force down tuition fees.[25] Other proposed reforms have included nationwide universal preschool education, tuition-free or reduced-tuition college, and reforms of standardized testing. Democrats have the long-term aim of having low-cost, publicly funded college education with low tuition fees (like in much of Europe and Canada), which should be available to every eligible American student. Alternatively, they encourage expanding access to post-secondary education by increasing state funding for student financial aid such as Pell Grants and college tuition tax deductions.[26]

        Democrats tend to support the Common Core State Standards and oppose school choice.

        Environment
        Main article: Environmental policy of the United States

        Democrats believe that the government should protect the environment and have a history of environmentalism. In more recent years, this stance has had as its emphasis alternative energy generation as the basis for an improved economy, greater national security, and general environmental benefits.[27]

        The Democratic Party also favors expanding conservation lands, and it encourages open space and rail travel to relieve highway and airport congestion and improve air quality and economy; it "believe[s] that communities, environmental interests, and government should work together to protect resources while ensuring the vitality of local economies. Once Americans were led to believe they had to make a choice between the economy and the environment. They now know this is a false choice."[28]

        The Democratic Party's most important environmental concern is climate change. Democrats, most notably former Vice President Al Gore, have pressed for stern regulation of greenhouse gases. On October 15, 2007, Gore won the Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts to build greater knowledge about man-made climate change and laying the foundations for the measures needed to counteract these changes asserting that "the climate crisis is not a political issue, it is a moral and spiritual challenge to all of humanity."[29] A 2017 study by the Center for American Progress Action Fund of climate change denial in the U.S. Congress found that 180 members deny the science behind climate change, all Republicans, and that no Democratic members of Congress publicly denied climate change.[30][31]

        Renewable energy and fossil fuels

        Democrats support increased domestic renewable energy development, including wind and solar power farms, in an effort to reduce carbon pollution. The party's platform calls for an "all of the above" energy policy including clean energy, natural gas, and domestic oil, while wanting to become energy independent.[22] The party has supported higher taxes on oil companies and increased regulations on coal power plants, favoring a policy of reducing long-term reliance on fossil fuels.[32][33] Additionally, the party supports stricter fuel emissions standards to prevent air pollution.

        Trade agreements

        The 2012 Democratic Party platform endorses fair and free trade, the KORUS FTA, the TPP, the Panama–United States Trade Promotion Agreement, the CTPA, and the Interagency Trade Enforcement Center.[34]

        Social issues

        The modern Democratic party emphasizes egalitarianism, social equality, protecting the environment, and strengthening the social safety net through liberalism. They support voting rights and minority rights, including LGBT rights, multiculturalism, and religious secularism. A longstanding social policy is upholding civil rights, which affect ethnic and racial minorities and includes voting rights, equal opportunity, and racial equality. The party championed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which for the first time outlawed segregation. Democrats made civil rights and anti-racism a core party philosophy. Carmines and Stimson say, "the Democratic Party appropriated racial liberalism and assumed federal responsibility for ending racial discrimination."[35][36][37]

        Ideological social elements in the party include cultural liberalism, civil libertarianism, and feminism. Other Democratic social policies are internationalism, open immigration, electoral reform, and women's reproductive rights.

        There's more. But I know you won't try to educate yourself. Do you get decent wifi under your bridge?

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 08 2020, @03:39PM (1 child)

          by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 08 2020, @03:39PM (#1018226)

          Here [wikipedia.org] is the 'Fascist Manifesto'. It was the stated principles upon which Mussolini's fascist party claimed to stand for.

          You might find something interesting. You probably agree with just about everything in it. And that's okay. They're generally good ideals. The point is that what a party claims to stand for and how that party acts are two very different things. I couldn't care less what a politician says, let alone a political group - I care how they act. And in modern times the DNC is becoming one hell of a scary organization. I tend to agree with their ideals on paper, but in practice I absolutely abhor what the DNC has turned into.

          • (Score: 2) by Azuma Hazuki on Thursday July 09 2020, @01:06AM

            by Azuma Hazuki (5086) on Thursday July 09 2020, @01:06AM (#1018452) Journal

            > but in practice I absolutely abhor what the DNC has turned into.

            Reagan Republicans, yeah. I'm with you on that.

            --
            I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 10 2020, @05:21AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 10 2020, @05:21AM (#1018969)

      This is nuanced, more so than either side acknowledges. The Confederacy existed for the purpose of supporting and perpetuating slavery, the right of a white person to own black people as property. This is not defensible.

      George Washington and Thomas Jefferson owned slaves. Jefferson publicly criticized slavery as being terribly wrong, yet he lacked the conviction to even refuse to personally partake in the evil. This is also not defensible.

      For a particular monument, we need to consider its purpose. This is where it gets complicated. We don't memorialize Washington or Jefferson because of their support for slavery. We memorialize them in spite of their support for slavery. Jefferson's ownership of slaves is a "hideous blot" on his character. The same can be said of Washington. We should acknowledge that Washington and Jefferson willingly participated in morally evil acts, that they are deeply flawed. But we should recognize their contributions, too, in rebelling against British rule and establishing the governing framework of the United States.

      Many monuments of people like Robert E. Lee and Jefferson Davis do not exist to acknowledge positive contributions from these people in spite of their role in the Confederacy. Neither do they stand to be grim reminders of a past we should never repeat, which is why some concentration camps like Dachau are preserved in Germany. Instead, many of these monuments were erected to portray the Confederacy positively, to encourage people to sympathize their their cause, which was the enslavement of black people by white people. Monuments supporting the Confederacy do not belong on public property. This is wrong.

      Nancy Pelosi ordered the removal of four portraits of former Speakers of the House from the Capital because they served in the Confederacy. This is also wrong. Those portraits are not displayed to support the Confederacy. Removing those portraits really is whitewashing history. We should conspicuously acknowledge that these four men served in the Confederacy, which was wrong. But we should not remove their portraits from being displayed along with those of all the Speakers of the House. Doing so is to deny history, which is a mistake.

      History is messy. People are messy. We need to be thoughtful in our decisions to remove or not remove monuments.