How state marijuana legalization became a boon for corruption
In the past decade, 15 states have legalized a regulated marijuana market for adults over 21, and another 17 have legalized medical marijuana. But in their rush to limit the numbers of licensed vendors and give local municipalities control of where to locate dispensaries, they created something else: A market for local corruption.
Almost all the states that legalized pot either require the approval of local officials – as in Massachusetts -- or impose a statewide limit on the number of licenses, chosen by a politically appointed oversight board, or both. These practices effectively put million-dollar decisions in the hands of relatively small-time political figures – the mayors and councilors of small towns and cities, along with the friends and supporters of politicians who appoint them to boards. And these strictures have given rise to the exact type of corruption that got [Jasiel] Correia in trouble with federal prosecutors. They have also created a culture in which would-be cannabis entrepreneurs feel obliged to make large campaign contributions or hire politically connected lobbyists.
For some entrepreneurs, the payments can seem worth the ticket to cannabis riches.
For some politicians, the lure of a bribe or favor can be irresistible.
[...] It's not just local officials. Allegations of corruption have reached the state level in numerous marijuana programs, especially ones in which a small group of commissioners are charged with dispensing limited numbers of licenses. Former Maryland state Del. Cheryl Glenn was sentenced to two years in prison in July for taking bribes in exchange for introducing and voting on legislation to benefit medical marijuana companies. Missouri Gov. Mike Parson's administration is the target of law enforcement and legislative probes into the rollout of its medical marijuana program.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 28 2020, @09:22PM (2 children)
"Boundaries don't change in *local* elections."
It's like you don't know how to read. I never said that they do or don't. I am just stating that they shouldn't.
The point is that elections at all levels should be such that gerrymandering is not possible.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 28 2020, @10:44PM (1 child)
I can read. You said [soylentnews.org]:
Gerrymandering has no role to play in Presidential elections (which is the only place where the "electoral college" has a role).
So yes, I can read. And you were talking out of your ass.
13 states already have non-partisan or bi-partisan redistricting entities [wikipedia.org], and that redistricting is *required* by the Constitution [congress.gov] every ten years.
If you don't have a non/bi-partisan redistricting commission in your state, that's your fault and you have no one to blame but yourself and fellow citizens of your state.
That you are unaware of these things just makes me even more sure you're really fucking dumb or don't live in the US at all.
Either way. That's all the feeding you get, asshole.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 28 2020, @11:02PM
You're right.