Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Politics
posted by Fnord666 on Saturday February 06 2021, @09:19AM   Printer-friendly

Arthur T Knackerbracket has processed the following story:

The independent review of Australia's main environment law, released last week, provided a sobering but accurate appraisal of a dire situation.

The review was led by Professor Graeme Samuel and involved consultation with scientists, legal experts, industry and conservation organizations. Samuel's report concluded Australia's biodiversity is in decline and the law (the EPBC Act) "is not fit for current or future environmental challenges".

[...] To reverse Australia's appalling track record of protecting biodiversity, four major reforms recommended by Samuel must be implemented as a package.

  1. Setting standards [...]
  2. Greater government accountability [...]
  3. Decent funding [...]
  4. Increase ecological knowledge [...]

[...] Samuel recommends Regional Recovery Plans be adequately funded to help develop some knowledge. But we suggest substantial new environmental capacity is needed, including new ecological research positions, increased environmental monitoring infrastructure, and appropriate funding of recovery plans, to ensure enough knowledge supports decision making.

Samuel's report has provided a path forward that could make a substantial difference to Australia's shocking track record of biodiversity conservation and land stewardship.

But Environment Minister Sussan Ley's response so far suggests the Morrison government plans to cherry pick from Samuel's recommendations, and rush through changes without appropriate safeguards.

If the changes we outlined above aren't implemented as a package, our precious natural heritage will continue to decline.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 07 2021, @06:56PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 07 2021, @06:56PM (#1110006)

    Or one could just not worry about it unless wishing to engage in physical sexual relations with the individual in question. Much simpler.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 09 2021, @08:09AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 09 2021, @08:09AM (#1110599)

    It's not conservatives making a big deal about it.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2NjsKrI0ac [youtube.com]