Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Politics
posted by mrpg on Friday May 28 2021, @11:26AM   Printer-friendly
from the what-could-go-wrong dept.

Ohio lawmakers want to abolish vaccine requirements:

[...] Lawmakers are working on legislation to call off the lottery immediately. They're also trying to head off any plans for "vaccine passports." And last month, they introduced a sweeping antivaccination bill that would essentially demolish public health and vaccination requirements in the state—and not just requirements for COVID-19 vaccines, requirements for any vaccine.

[...] State Rep. Beth Liston (D-Dublin) blasted the bill, telling The Columbus Dispatch, "Not only would it prevent schools, businesses and communities from putting safety measures in pace related to COVID, it will impact the health of our children... This bill applies to all vaccines—polio, measles, meningitis, etc. If it becomes law we will see worsening measles outbreaks, meningitis in the dorms, and children once again suffering from polio."

[...] "At its core, this proposal would destroy our current public health framework that prevents outbreaks of potentially lethal diseases, threatens the stability of our economy as it recovers from a devastating pandemic and jeopardizes the way we live, learn, work and celebrate life," the letter said.

[...] "HB 248 would put all Ohioans at risk while increasing the cost of health care for families, individuals and businesses," spokesperson Dan Williamson said. "This proposal applies to all immunizations, including childhood vaccines. If passed, this legislation could reverse decades of immunity from life-threatening, but vaccine-preventable diseases such as measles, mumps, hepatitis, meningitis and tuberculosis."

Also: Ohio GOP lawmakers, citing 'need to protect' from vaccines, seek to expand exemptions, nix COVID passports


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Beryllium Sphere (r) on Friday May 28 2021, @05:54PM (21 children)

    by Beryllium Sphere (r) (5062) on Friday May 28 2021, @05:54PM (#1139762)

    They switched sides in the 20th century. Extensively documented.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy [wikipedia.org]

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +4  
       Insightful=2, Interesting=1, Informative=1, Total=4
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 0, Troll) by crafoo on Friday May 28 2021, @06:21PM (20 children)

    by crafoo (6639) on Friday May 28 2021, @06:21PM (#1139779)

    A lie, told often enough, doesn't make it true. No one switched sides. The left still openly and gleefully promotes slavery. I mean, they are too stupid to realize communism = slavery, but then democrats have never been all that intelligent.

    • (Score: 2, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 28 2021, @06:57PM (15 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 28 2021, @06:57PM (#1139797)

      Slavery is where you can't leave your job because you will wind up homeless, pennyless and without health care for anyone in your family. There is a reason why the RWNJ's try to destroy every safety net ever legislated - they do the bidding of the slavers whose aim is to indenture everybody.

      • (Score: 2) by sjames on Friday May 28 2021, @09:14PM (10 children)

        by sjames (2882) on Friday May 28 2021, @09:14PM (#1139843) Journal

        In support of your statement, low wage employers have been wringing their hands over not enough people applying for their really shitty jobs. It's the Republicans that want an early end to enhanced unemployment benefits to force people to stop looking for a decent job and accept a crappy McJob now.

        • (Score: 1) by khallow on Sunday May 30 2021, @05:38AM (9 children)

          by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Sunday May 30 2021, @05:38AM (#1140190) Journal

          an early end to enhanced unemployment benefits to force people to stop looking for a decent job

          Sounds like those recipients aren't looking for jobs at all, much less the elusive decent job. Not a good argument for UBI or the OP's "statement", let us note.

          And of course, it's more important to get tribal and thwart them evil Republicans, rather than doing something good.

          The obvious rebuttal is that a crappy McJob gives you more freedom than than temporary government benefits that can be turned off at any time. You can always get another McJob at the drop of a hat. You can't always get another government.

          • (Score: 2) by sjames on Sunday May 30 2021, @08:27AM (8 children)

            by sjames (2882) on Sunday May 30 2021, @08:27AM (#1140212) Journal

            OTOH, it's a bit hard to go job hunting and interviewing if you're too busy asking "Want fries with that?".

            There are actually stats showing that employers a level or two above McJobs are having little to no difficulty recruiting. The potential employees are out there and they can be hired without bending them over a barrel, it's just that the McEmployers aren't willing to do what it takes.

            Many of the very same employers who were crying poverty in 2019 when raising minimum wage was being debated seem to have come up with the money to offer $15/hour now (in spite of a terrible year). They too are managing to find new employees.

            • (Score: 1) by khallow on Sunday May 30 2021, @11:57AM (7 children)

              by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Sunday May 30 2021, @11:57AM (#1140230) Journal

              OTOH, it's a bit hard to go job hunting and interviewing if you're too busy asking "Want fries with that?".

              Is it too much to expect people to do things that are a "bit hard"?

              There are actually stats showing that employers a level or two above McJobs are having little to no difficulty recruiting.

              Why again is that supposed to excuse screwing over McJobs employers and McJobs workers? How is someone supposed to get employers a level or two above McJobs when one's recent work history has a year or two gap?

              • (Score: 2) by sjames on Sunday May 30 2021, @04:06PM (6 children)

                by sjames (2882) on Sunday May 30 2021, @04:06PM (#1140269) Journal

                How are McJobs workers being screwed over by getting a chance to look hard for something better? The McJobs employers have been screwing the workers over for years and now the chickens are home to roost. Note that the ones that started offering better pay started getting applicants.

                The employers a level or two above have a year long gap themselves, they're not going to look too hard at that right now.

                • (Score: 1) by khallow on Sunday May 30 2021, @09:58PM (5 children)

                  by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Sunday May 30 2021, @09:58PM (#1140335) Journal

                  How are McJobs workers being screwed over by getting a chance to look hard for something better?

                  They already have the chance. Now, they're getting paid to slack off. Some will make those bad choices. And since the earlier poster was equating bad choices with slavery, this is more such bad choices that they can equate with slavery, should they choose to be fair.

                  The McJobs employers have been screwing the workers over for years and now the chickens are home to roost.

                  In rhetoric not reality.

                  The employers a level or two above have a year long gap themselves, they're not going to look too hard at that right now.

                  Because? It's always an issue.

                  • (Score: 2) by sjames on Monday May 31 2021, @01:45AM (4 children)

                    by sjames (2882) on Monday May 31 2021, @01:45AM (#1140396) Journal

                    So you're saying people will be happier if a central authority takes excessive choices away from them for their own good?

                    Arbeit macht frei perhaps?

                    • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday May 31 2021, @02:06AM (3 children)

                      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday May 31 2021, @02:06AM (#1140402) Journal

                      So you're saying people will be happier if a central authority takes excessive choices away from them for their own good?

                      No. I'm saying we'll all be better off, if government stops paying people to be bums.

                      • (Score: 2) by sjames on Monday May 31 2021, @02:50AM (2 children)

                        by sjames (2882) on Monday May 31 2021, @02:50AM (#1140411) Journal

                        But apparently they're not being bums, they're looking for decently paying work. Employers willing to pay decently are not having any problem hiring.

                        • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday May 31 2021, @05:05AM (1 child)

                          by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday May 31 2021, @05:05AM (#1140438) Journal

                          apparently

                          No evidence for this "apparently". It sure doesn't appear to me that way.

      • (Score: 1) by khallow on Saturday May 29 2021, @02:36AM (3 children)

        by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Saturday May 29 2021, @02:36AM (#1139921) Journal

        Slavery is where you can't leave your job because you will wind up homeless, pennyless and without health care for anyone in your family.

        Fortunately, the real world is not like slavery because you can get another job and thus not end up homeless, penniless, and without health care for anyone in your family.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 29 2021, @03:27PM (2 children)

          by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 29 2021, @03:27PM (#1140042)

          Not necessarily. It's a big gamble. It's an even bigger gamble if you've elected to leverage your poverty-tier savings buying something like... Let's say a massively inflated vehicle so you can get to work. Lest we forget that means paying for full coverage auto insurance, which is incredulously expensive. But you don't have to be impoverished to be a slave to debt it's a question of lifestyle. Your oil rigger swine will hyper-leverage in good times and slave unquestioningly to keep his two 4x4's, RV, RAM 2500, and boat paid for. Even modest people who just want a reasonable house can be made slaves if the proportions are correct.

          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 29 2021, @07:17PM

            by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 29 2021, @07:17PM (#1140077)

            Slavery is not about pleasant or unpleasant experience but about the direct prevention of liberty.

            A man who works in a palace, lavished with concubines, and treated generally like royalty is, nonetheless, a slave if he would be directly prevented from ever abandoning said life if he sought to do so. That "you" (a major problem with internet discourse is people speaking for people they know nothing about, but alas) feel coerced to work to maintain your lifestyle does not make you a slave. If you want to give it all up tomorrow and see if you can make it out in the wilds, start pan handling on the streets, or make your way to France and join the Foreign Legion, then you are 100% free to do so. A slave is not and would immediately sought out, and generally reprimanded.

          • (Score: 1) by khallow on Sunday May 30 2021, @02:36AM

            by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Sunday May 30 2021, @02:36AM (#1140155) Journal

            Not necessarily. It's a big gamble.

            Compared to "homeless, pennyless and without health care"?

            It's an even bigger gamble if you've elected to leverage your poverty-tier savings buying something like... Let's say a massively inflated vehicle so you can get to work.

            If you're buying expensive bling like that, then you have a different opinion of the relative odds of the big gamble. Who am I to disagree?

            But you don't have to be impoverished to be a slave to debt it's a question of lifestyle. Your oil rigger swine will hyper-leverage in good times and slave unquestioningly to keep his two 4x4's, RV, RAM 2500, and boat paid for. Even modest people who just want a reasonable house can be made slaves if the proportions are correct.

            Making bad choices or having an expensive lifestyle is not slavery. Words have meaning.

    • (Score: 4, Insightful) by DeathMonkey on Friday May 28 2021, @08:27PM (3 children)

      by DeathMonkey (1380) on Friday May 28 2021, @08:27PM (#1139821) Journal

      Those aren't lefties toting around Confederate Flags...

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 28 2021, @09:36PM (1 child)

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 28 2021, @09:36PM (#1139849)

        No, they are the ones burning the American flag.

        • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 28 2021, @09:47PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 28 2021, @09:47PM (#1139853)

          Which is freedom of speech. Why do you hate freedom bro? Liberals win again, you must be hurtin. How did assaulting democracy work out for you? Seems like blue lives no longer matter to conservatives.

          What do you people actually stand for now?

      • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 28 2021, @09:41PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 28 2021, @09:41PM (#1139850)

        and literal Nazi flags . . .