Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
Politics
posted by janrinok on Thursday March 31 2022, @12:32PM   Printer-friendly

Finland's Spy Service Warns of Russian Interference, Attacks:

Finland must brace for Russian interference and hybrid attacks as it weighs whether to join the NATO military alliance, the security services warned on Tuesday.

The Nordic nation shares a 1,340-kilometre (830-mile) border with Russia and has remained militarily non-aligned since the end of World War II to avoid provoking its eastern neighbour.

[...] "The whole of Finnish society must be vigilant towards Russian attempts to influence Finnish decision-making regarding the NATO question," Antti Pelttari, head of the Finnish security services Supo, said.

Releasing its updated terrorism threat report, Supo on Tuesday highlighted the danger of "widespread Russian interference and illegal surveillance," but kept the national terror threat at level two, or "elevated", on a scale of four.

[...] Finland has previously been subject to so-called hybrid tactics from Moscow, such as repeated airspace incursions, or the release in 2016 of 1,700 migrants across the Finnish border.

Earlier this month the transport authority Traficom said it had received "numerous" reports from aircraft of GPS interference in eastern Finland, but was unable to identify the source of the interference.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by khallow on Friday April 01 2022, @03:29AM (6 children)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday April 01 2022, @03:29AM (#1233931) Journal

    that during referendum about being in the USSR Ukrainians rejected separation by 70-80% margin

    So this was a referendum during the days of the USSR? Sounds like a waste of time to consider.

    Also consider how much fight is in the Ukraine today, sounds like it's not a 70-80% margin any more, even if we were to optimistically assume that this alleged referendum reflected actual voter will.

    The whole Ukraine is a separate country thing is illegal.

    Russia signed a treaty acknowledging the sovereignty of Ukraine. So we're out of laws that would be relevant to your claim.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by legont on Saturday April 02 2022, @02:58AM (1 child)

    by legont (4179) on Saturday April 02 2022, @02:58AM (#1234293)

    So this was a referendum during the days of the USSR? Sounds like a waste of time to consider.

    This referendum was run by Yeltsin. He "considered" it and dissolved the USSR anyway against the will of the People.

    --
    "Wealth is the relentless enemy of understanding" - John Kenneth Galbraith.
    • (Score: 1, Disagree) by khallow on Saturday April 02 2022, @03:22PM

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Saturday April 02 2022, @03:22PM (#1234357) Journal
      Let's look at the wording [wikipedia.org]:

      Do you consider necessary the preservation of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics as a renewed federation of equal sovereign republics in which the rights and freedom of an individual of any ethnicity will be fully guaranteed?

      The question might be missing something in translation, but the USSR never was this. Voters would have been voting on continuing/renewing a USSR that never existed in the first place! And given how much trouble Russia has had since with those rights and freedom of individuals, I think continuing the USSR would have been a dire mistake and contrary to the wish displayed in that referendum. Yeltsin made the right call.

      After all, this displays a big problem of the USSR, the political dominance of Russia which had a firm majority of the population of the USSR (my bet is that this was by design back in the day to insure that the USSR couldn't be swayed by a non-Russian faction). It reminds me of the Wiemar Republic which had a similar instability in the Free State of Prussia (which IIRC had two thirds of the population of the Wiemar Republic). Failings of the single large state become failings of the entire country.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 03 2022, @02:38AM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 03 2022, @02:38AM (#1234494)

    I hate to say it, but you are falling for a standard troll tactic. They provide a kernel of truth to obfuscate the lie. If you want to know what Ukraine thought about being part of the USSR, then you should really look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1991_Ukrainian_independence_referendum [wikipedia.org] But that obviously paints a completely different picture of what the Ukrainian people wanted.

    • (Score: 2) by legont on Sunday April 03 2022, @07:18PM (2 children)

      by legont (4179) on Sunday April 03 2022, @07:18PM (#1234607)

      This article is 100% fake. You can easily see it as there are no links to the official results of the vote.
      This one does have such a link. Feel free to research it yourself

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1991_Soviet_Union_referendum [wikipedia.org]

      --
      "Wealth is the relentless enemy of understanding" - John Kenneth Galbraith.
      • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday April 04 2022, @02:58AM

        by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday April 04 2022, @02:58AM (#1234669) Journal
        That's a different referendum.
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 04 2022, @05:23AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 04 2022, @05:23AM (#1234686)

        100% fake. LOL. The citations there are as official as any you'd find in your blessed wikipedia article.