Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Politics
posted by janrinok on Friday April 01 2022, @02:18AM   Printer-friendly

Severe drought and mandatory water cuts are pitting communities against each other in Arizona:

As the climate crisis intensifies, battle lines are beginning to form over water. In Arizona -- amid a decades-long megadrought -- some communities are facing the very real possibility of losing access to the precious water that remains.

Outside the city limits of Scottsdale, where the asphalt ends and the dirt road begins, is the Rio Verde Foothills community. Hundreds of homes here get water trucked in from Scottsdale, but those deliveries will end on January 1, 2023.

That's because last summer, for the first time ever, drought conditions forced the federal government to declare a tier 1 water shortage in the Colorado River, reducing how much Arizona can use.

[...] "We are what I call the 'sacrificial lamb' for the bigger areas," Irwin told CNN. "In my opinion, look somewhere else -- we need to be able to sustain ourselves."

The scarcity of water in the state is pitting small towns against fast-growing metropolitan communities.

[...] Arizona's population growth and extreme drought have increased demand for water in limited supply. Kathleen Ferris, a senior research fellow with the Kyl Center for Water Policy in Arizona, says water scarcity in the state has resulted in the "haves" and the "have nots," and likened the coming water battles to the days of the Wild West. "Once you have your water rights, you defend it," Ferris said. "That's the way it works."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Fluffeh on Friday April 01 2022, @02:29AM (9 children)

    by Fluffeh (954) Subscriber Badge on Friday April 01 2022, @02:29AM (#1233915) Journal

    I always find it amazing how things like seem to pop up more and more often, yet the deniers will insist that this is all natural, and that there's nothing we've done that's impacted this, we don't need to alter our behavior or change our plans for the future.

    I also find it stunning, how politicians never seem to find the money to try to work through these long term problems - even though they've not been exactly sneaking up on anyone. I guess solving a water sustainability problem just isn't sexy enough.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 0, Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 01 2022, @02:35AM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 01 2022, @02:35AM (#1233918)

    Scientific evidence shows the West has gone through cycles of drought much more intense than any in our brief 200 year experience as a country with that region. As a matter of fact, we settled the West during one of its wetter periods. Our experience of what is normal in the West is off.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 01 2022, @10:19AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 01 2022, @10:19AM (#1233987)

      Well played, sir. Truly well done.

    • (Score: 2) by epitaxial on Friday April 01 2022, @12:57PM (1 child)

      by epitaxial (3165) on Friday April 01 2022, @12:57PM (#1234005)

      *Citation needed

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 01 2022, @08:15PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 01 2022, @08:15PM (#1234138)

        From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colorado_River_Compact [wikipedia.org]

        Specifically, the amount of water allocated was based on an expectation that the river's average flow was 16,400,000 acre-feet (20.2 km3) per year (641 m³/s). Subsequent tree ring studies, however, have concluded that the long-term average water flow of the Colorado is significantly less. Estimates have included 13,200,000 acre-feet (16.3 km3) per year (516 m³/s),[15] 13,500,000 acre-feet (16.7 km3) per year (528 m3/s),[16] and 14,300,000 acre-feet (17.6 km3) per year (559 m3/s).[17] Many analysts have concluded that when the compact was negotiated, the period used as the basis for "average" flow of the river (1905–1922) included periods of abnormally high precipitation,[18] and that the recent drought in the region is in fact a return to historically typical patterns.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 01 2022, @08:15AM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 01 2022, @08:15AM (#1233963)

    The politicians are the deniers. The whole system is screwy.

    I live in Colorado. Every year in the winter and spring, they will measure the snowpack (it's not just for skiing, that's where all the water comes from) and tell you how it compares to average. Usually - big surprise - it's pretty close to average. Sometimes it's 80% of normal, sometimes 120%, whatever. Right now it's 92% of normal [usda.gov]. This was a weird winter, it didn't snow at all in November or December, but it snowed like crazy in February. The thing about snowpack, nobody can mess with it. It comes from natural snowfall and it melts when it melts, and the only comparison is to the historical measured averages.

    Then, every year just like clockwork, they will tell you the whole state is experiencing a drought [drought.gov]. Right now 100% of the state is at least "abnormally dry" and 83% is some sort of "drought," somewhere from moderate to exceptional.

    I have been on rafting trips where they have closed part of the river because water levels were too high, during a "drought."

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 01 2022, @10:17PM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 01 2022, @10:17PM (#1234207)

      You should look past the "we had average snowpack everything should be dandy" logic. It is more complicated, and one normal year doesn't make up for lots of drought years.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 02 2022, @01:27AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 02 2022, @01:27AM (#1234262)

        The thing is, every year is a normal year for snowpack, and every year is also a "drought." Maybe one year in ten is not a statewide drought.

        If you have such a deep understanding of what is really going on, maybe you could enlighten us?

  • (Score: 2) by driverless on Friday April 01 2022, @08:19AM

    by driverless (4770) on Friday April 01 2022, @08:19AM (#1233964)

    From TFA:

    The Cities along the river currently use less than half of their existing municipal entitlement. They can likely triple their population under their existing allocations

    And there you have the exact reason why the problem exists in the first place. "No problem, water is infinite, build more suburbs in the middle of the desert!".

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 01 2022, @08:49AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 01 2022, @08:49AM (#1233973)

    A drought in the desert. Holy fuck! The world is ending! Quickly, redistribute all property!