Greene offers bill to abolish Section 230
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) on Thursday is introducing a bill to abolish Section 230 — the law the protects online platforms from liability — on the heels of Twitter accepting Elon Musk's offer to buy the company and take it private.
Greene's bill would eliminate the law making online platforms not liable for content posted by third parties and replace it with a provision to require "reasonable, non-discriminatory access to online communications platforms" through a "common carrier" framework that Greene compared to airlines or package delivery services.
Republicans have long claimed that social media platforms have an anti-conservative bias, pointing to tweets that have been taken down and the removal of entire feeds from networks.
[....] Titled the 21st Century FREE Speech Act, Greene's measure will serve as the House version of a Senate bill sponsored by Sen. Bill Hagerty (R-Tenn.).
To combat the alleged bias against conservatives, it would prevent online communications platforms from exerting "undue or unreasonable preference or advantage to any particular person, class of persons, political or religious group or affiliation, or locality" and would provide consumers a mechanism to sue for violations.
Should any platform be liable for someone else's speech? Even if they engage in moderation?
(Score: 4, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 29 2022, @09:40PM (1 child)
It is not so much the one misspelled word (although it was not misspelled, it just was the wrong word, an "eggcorn" if you will), it is a long series of misspelled words, misunderstood concepts, blind ignorance of things any American politician ought to be aware of, like amendments to the Constitution besides the 2nd, and crediting wacko conspiracy theories, that suggest that MTG is in fact an actual moron, and mostly illiterate. Marxism teaches us:
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/162471-he-may-look-like-an-idiot-and-talk-like-an [goodreads.com]
She really is an idiot. Not just a different point of view, or alternate opinions, but an actual idiot.
(Score: 0, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 30 2022, @05:53AM
And here I thought this was in reference to the ignorant moron, Runaway1956. Well, a reference can have more than one referent, I always say.