A bruising, failed 16-month FCC nomination has left President Joe Biden with little time to staff up the agency before 2024:
Shortly after coming into office, President Joe Biden moved to restore net neutrality. He signed a sweeping executive order to promote competition, calling on the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to bring back the Obama-era internet rules rolled back by the Trump administration.
But close to two years later, the FCC remains deadlocked with only four of its five commissioner slots filled — and Biden may be running out of time.
Biden's pick for a new FCC commissioner was Gigi Sohn, a former FCC official and public interest advocate. Sohn would have secured a long-awaited Democratic majority at the agency. After she was nominated in October 2021, however, a well-funded opposition organized a brutal opposition campaign against her. The culture-war campaign called Sohn an "extremist" and a "censor" because of past tweets criticizing Fox News and former President Donald Trump, largely ignoring her decades-long professional record. After more than 16 months and three separate confirmation hearings, Sohn withdrew her nomination earlier this month, citing the "unrelenting, dishonest and cruel attacks" by broadband and cable lobbyists and their friends.
It's unlikely Biden will pick someone as critical of cable companies again — but Republicans could try to thwart even a centrist candidate
Now, the White House has been forced to start over, prolonging a vacancy that continues to obstruct the administration's broadband agenda. The White House hasn't announced a new nominee or when they're hoping to confirm someone, but it's unlikely that Biden would pick someone as critical of cable companies as Sohn. Republicans and "dark money" groups have already proved that they're willing to spend millions to block progressive nominees. With so little time left in Biden's first term, stakeholders may even try to thwart a more moderate nominee, especially if there's an opportunity to continue the stalemate past the 2024 election.
Even if the White House selects a new nominee in the next few weeks, it could take months for them to be vetted and confirmed by the Senate. If the White House drags its feet in finding a replacement, Biden could be without a fifth commissioner when the 2024 election season begins. "The FCC deadlock, now over two years long, will remain so for a long time," Sohn said in a statement announcing her withdrawal last week. "It is a sad day for our country and our democracy when dominant industries, with assistance from unlimited dark money, get to choose their regulators."
Net neutrality, which bans internet service providers from favoring or degrading the quality of specific services, was one of Biden's big-ticket promises. But as it's an issue that mostly splits down party lines, the FCC's stalemate has left his hands tied — putting states in charge of issuing their own patchwork rules.
Other parts of Biden's agenda have suffered the same problem, including ones that are facing looming deadlines.
His 2021 infrastructure package required the agency to craft rules that would ensure all Americans, despite income status, have equal access to the internet. The agency has until November to draft these new digital discrimination rules, but civil rights groups fear it may be impossible to roll out meaningful protections without a third commissioner.
"If advanced, the rule could hold broadband providers liable if their practices result in less internet access for people of color and low income communities, even if companies don't intentionally discriminate," the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights said in a February statement on the rulemaking. "Without a fully functioning FCC, that rule is likely to be much weaker."
"Lack of FCC oversight has enabled collection and sale of cell phone location data that puts vulnerable communities at risk"
(Score: 3, Insightful) by DadaDoofy on Saturday March 18, @02:12PM (5 children)
We don't need extremists from either side running the FCC. But in particular, one from the far left who would likely ignore the first amendment.
(Score: 3, Interesting) by Opportunist on Saturday March 18, @02:44PM
Prefer one from the far right that ignores the first amendment? Sorry to break it to you, but the only choice left is the extremes, the middle ground has left the building a long time ago. You can only choose between being squelched because you offend the sensibilities of people or because you offend the sensibilities of some imaginary being.
And if I only can side either with people or a faery tale, I prefer reality.
(Score: 2) by Thexalon on Saturday March 18, @06:05PM (3 children)
Out of curiosity, what exactly do you think "net neutrality" actually does? Because based on what you wrote I'm pretty sure your idea of "net neutrality" has more to do with the Fairness Doctrine that ended around 40 years ago than with what net neutrality is.
The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 18, @08:28PM (2 children)
More importantly, why are Republicans so hell-bent against it? Are there any arguments from that corner any more is it all just swampy ass meat?
(Score: 3, Informative) by Runaway1956 on Saturday March 18, @10:42PM (1 child)
There is profit in being the gatekeeper. You want to listen to music? Pay us to not throttle it. You're a gamer? Pay us, and we'll take care of your lag. Streaming movies? Pay us, and we'll be sure to keep your customers happy. That is what the argument is all about. Why should the sheeple be able to access whatever they want, if we can shake them down for a dollar here, and a dollar there?
Don’t confuse the news with the truth.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 18, @11:03PM
Isn't there also a deep packet inspection component to it - similar to examining vaginas at the State line? If you have nothing to hide, then there's nothing to fear.