Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 10 submissions in the queue.
Politics
posted by hubie on Tuesday June 02, @01:07PM   Printer-friendly

The feds are raising the alarm about a new category of threat:

In the wake of attacks on CEOs, a nationwide protest movement targeting data centers, and increasing concerns about AI job replacement, federal intelligence agencies and domestic law enforcement are circulating reports with a new domestic target in mind: anti-technology extremists.

More than 1,000 pages of unpublished reports from the Department of Homeland Security, FBI, and fusion centers obtained by WIRED show a national shift taking place to surveil this new and worryingly broad category of people and activities deemed an emerging threat.

This new effort follows President Donald Trump's National Security Presidential Memo 7, which instructs the Department of Justice to target anyone holding "anti-American," "anti-Christian," and "anti-capitalism" beliefs. Earlier this month, Trump's counterterrorism czar, Sebastian Gorka, released a public counterterrorism strategy claiming that left-wing extremists are one of the three top counterterrorism priorities facing the United States.

Taken together, these Trump administration directives have commandeered the domestic surveillance apparatus to surveil and criminalize speech and assembly that challenges the ideology of the White House. A new focus on anti-technology extremism adds an unreported category to already public designations under a presidency that has heavily invested political and material capital in AI and data center proliferation.

Among the documents in the tranche obtained by WIRED is a New York Intelligence and Counterterrorism Bureau report that warns of widespread upheaval in response to AI adoption. Of particular note is a novel term for what the bureau purports to be an emerging extremism threat.

"The chaotic atmosphere that may result from emergent AI technology in the next five years may fuel large-scale protests that devolve into civil unrest and anti-tech violent extremist activity, especially in large urban areas such as New York City," the report reads. The term "anti-tech violent extremism" does not appear in any publicly available DHS or FBI domestic extremism reports or guides and represents a novel grouping of a wide range of ideologies under a single extremist category.

[...] Created in the wake of 9/11, 80 fusion centers now pockmark the country and serve as go-betweens for federal intelligence agencies and state and local law enforcement. In addition to concerns about portions of the American populace disturbed by the rapid proliferation of AI, these centers are also gathering and circulating "intelligence" about alleged threats to data centers.

A Western Pennsylvania fusion center, for example, claimed that "adversarial actors, including state-sponsored entities, criminal groups, and extremists, such as homegrown violent extremists or environmental extremists, may target US data centers" and that "these actors could also exploit the strategic importance of data centers to the US economy, using them for activities like cryptocurrency mining or leveraging third-party entities, such as front companies, to gain access to US data and infrastructure."


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by hubie (1068) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by JoeMerchant on Tuesday June 02, @06:46PM

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Tuesday June 02, @06:46PM (#1444254) Journal

    Prices have gone every which way... tech prices have collapsed almost as radically as Dutch tulip bulbs, but they never made 8TB Dutch tulip bulbs... Houses have probably gotten cheaper per square foot, but they're also much bigger on average. Cars have become even more of a rental agreement item than they ever were, and they have legally mandated all kinds of crap into the new ones that just didn't even exist 50 years ago.

    The idea that you can put a single number on how the value of a dollar evolves over time is deep fallacy. Different people have different uses for their dollars.

    One peculiar data point in the univese of "things people do with their money":

    Over the past 100 years, the private island market has evolved from an obscure, highly illiquid real estate niche into a multi-billion-dollar global status symbol. Prices have shifted from nominal sums in the 1920s to modern valuations where ultra-luxury islands easily fetch between $50 million and $300 million.This pricing evolution did not happen uniformly. It tracks across distinct eras driven by technology, global wealth, and the shift from "raw land" to "self-sustaining luxury eco-resorts."

    1. The Era Breakdown: 1926 to 2026

    1920s–1950s: The "Raw Land" EraMarket Dynamics: Islands were viewed as isolated, highly impractical parcels of land.

    Pricing: A few thousand dollars. For instance, in the 1930s and 1940s, a 100-acre island in North America or the Caribbean could frequently be purchased for $5,000 to $15,000 (equivalent to roughly $100,000–$250,000 today adjusted for standard inflation).

    Limiting Factors: There was no technology to easily generate power, desalinate water, or establish reliable long-range communication.

    1960s–1980s: The Celebrity Pioneer Era

    Market Dynamics: The advent of commercial aviation and high-speed yachts made remote destinations accessible. High-profile figures (like Marlon Brando buying Tetiaroa in 1966) triggered the concept of the island as an ultimate privacy retreat.

    Pricing: Mid-to-high six figures. A famous benchmark is Richard Branson buying the uninhabited 74-acre Necker Island in 1978 for $180,000.

    1990s–2010s: The Billionaire Arms Race

    Market Dynamics: The dot-com boom and the explosion of global ultra-high-net-worth individuals (UHNWIs) turned islands into competitive trophy assets. The launch of specialized platforms like Private Islands Online digitized the inventory.

    Pricing: Tens of millions. Jeffrey Epstein purchased Little Saint James in 1998 for $7.95 million. By 2012, tech billionaire Larry Ellison purchased 98% of the Hawaiian island of Lanai for an unprecedented $300 million.

    2020s–2026: The Pandemic Spike and Modern Bifurcation

    Market Dynamics: The COVID-19 pandemic caused a massive surge in demand for pathogens-free isolation. Concurrently, the necessity for high-speed satellite internet (like Starlink) became a primary driver of modern island value.

    Pricing: Complete divergence. As of June 2026, the market has completely bifurcated into two distinct tiers: "budget" unhabitable islands and turnkey ultra-luxury sanctuaries.

    --
    🌻🌻🌻🌻✌️ [google.com]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3