SoylentNews
SoylentNews is people
https://soylentnews.org/

Title    $7.4 Million Verdict in Blurred Lines Case Likely to Alter Music Business
Date    Friday March 13 2015, @03:48PM
Author    LaminatorX
Topic   
from the let's-get-it-on dept.
https://soylentnews.org/article.pl?sid=15/03/12/1328225

Hugh Pickens writes:

The Washington Post reports that the $7.4 million verdict that Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke copied Marvin Gaye’s music to create their hit song “Blurred Lines” could ripple across the music industry, potentially changing how artists work and opening the door to new copyright claims. Howard King, lead attorney for Thicke and Williams, said in closing arguments that a verdict for the Gaye family would have a chilling effect on musicians trying to evoke an era or create an homage to the sound of earlier artists. Williams contended during the trial that he was only trying to mimic the “feel” of Gaye’s late 1970s music but insisted he did not use elements of his idol’s work. “Today’s successful verdict, with the odds more than stacked against the Marvin Gaye estate, could redefine what copyright infringement means for recording artists,” says Glen Rothstein, an intellectual property attorney. King says record labels are going to become more reluctant to release music that’s similar to other works—an assertion disputed by Richard Busch, the lead attorney for the Gaye family. “While Mr. Williams's lawyer suggested in his closing argument that the world would come to an end, and music would cease to exist if they were found liable, I still see the sun shining,” says Busch. “The music industry will go on.”

Music copyright trials are rare, but allegations that a song copies another artist’s work are common. Singers Sam Smith and Tom Petty recently reached an agreement that conferred songwriting credit to Petty on Smith’s song, “Stay With Me,” which resembled Petty’s hit “I Won’t Back Down.” Other music copyright cases include Former Beatle George Harrison's 1970 solo song "My Sweet Lord" which had a melody heavy with echoes of "He's So Fine," the 1962 hit from The Chiffons. The copyright owner sued Harrison. A judge said that while the tunes were nearly identical, Harrison was guilty only of "subconscious plagiarism." Harrison would eventually pay out $587,000. Probably the most bizarre case of musical infringement was when John Fogerty was accused of stealing from John Fogerty. The Creedence Clearwater Revival frontman was sued for his 1985 solo song "The Old Man Down the Road" because his former label thought it sounded too much like the 1970 Fogerty-penned "Run Through the Jungle," a song it owned the rights to.

Links

  1. "Hugh Pickens" - http://tingmodel.com/
  2. "changing how artists work and opening the door to new copyright claims" - http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/jury-finds-pharrell-thicke-copied-for-blurred-lines-song/2015/03/10/584a408c-c783-11e4-bea5-b893e7ac3fb3_story.html
  3. "Sam Smith and Tom Petty recently reached an agreement that conferred songwriting credit to Petty on Smith’s song" - http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/sam-smith--tom-petty-settlement-20150126
  4. "Harrison was guilty only of "subconscious plagiarism."" - http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2015/03/11/history-past-music-plagiarism-claims-includes-george-harrison-tom-petty-and/
  5. "when John Fogerty was accused of stealing from John Fogerty" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fogerty_v._Fantasy,_Inc.

© Copyright 2024 - SoylentNews, All Rights Reserved

printed from SoylentNews, $7.4 Million Verdict in Blurred Lines Case Likely to Alter Music Business on 2024-03-28 17:31:52