SoylentNews
SoylentNews is people
https://soylentnews.org/

Title    Is Screen Resolution Good Enough Considering the Fovea Centralis of the Eye?
Date    Wednesday January 11 2017, @08:08AM
Author   
Topic   
from the surgically-grafted-to-the-inside-of-the-eyelids dept.
https://soylentnews.org/article.pl?sid=17/01/10/2248225

SC Red Baron writes:

The top google hits say that there is little or no benefit to resolution above 4k. I recently bought a 40" 4k tv which I use as a monitor (2' viewing distance). While this is right at the threshold where I'm told no benefit can be gained from additional resolution, I can still easily discern individual pixels. I'm still able to see individual pixels until I get to about a 4' viewing distance (but I am nearsighted).

I did some research and according to Wikipedia the Fovea Centralis (center of the eye) has a resolution of 31.5 arc seconds. At this resolution, a 4k monitor would need to be only 16" at a 2' viewing distance, or my 40" would need a 5' viewing distance.

Now the Fovea Centralis comprises only the size of 2 thumbnails width at arms length (2° viewing angle) and the eye's resolution drops off quickly farther from the center. But this tiny portion of the eye is processed by 50% of the visual cortex of the brain.

So I ask, are there any soylentils with perfect vision and/or a super high resolution set up, and does this match where you can no longer discern individual pixels? Do you think retina resolution needs to match the Fovea Centralis or is a lesser value acceptable?

My 40" 4k at 2' fills my entire field of view. I really like it because I have so much screen real estate for multiple windows or large spreadsheets, or I can scoot back a little bit for gaming (so I don't have to turn my head to see everything) and enjoy the higher resolution. I find 4k on high graphics looks much nicer than 1080p on Ultra. I find the upgrade is well worth the $600 I spent for the tv and a graphics card that can run it. Have you upgraded to 4k and do you think it was worth it? I would one day like to have dual 32" 8k monitors (not 3D). What is your dream setup if technology and price weren't an issue?

Written from my work 1366 x 768 monitor.

Related discussions: First "8K" Video Appears on YouTube
LG to Demo an 8K Resolution TV at the Consumer Electronics Show
What is your Video / Monitor Setup?
Microsoft and Sony's Emerging 4K Pissing Contest


Original Submission

Links

  1. "SC Red Baron" - mailto:starcraft.red.baron@gmail.com
  2. "top google hits" - https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=is+4k+worth+it
  3. "Fovea Centralis" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fovea_centralis
  4. "31.5 arc seconds" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fovea_centralis#Angular_size_of_foveal_cones
  5. "2 thumbnails width at arms length" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fovea_centralis#Function
  6. "50%" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fovea_centralis#Function
  7. "First "8K" Video Appears on YouTube" - https://soylentnews.org/article.pl?sid=15/06/12/2218228
  8. "LG to Demo an 8K Resolution TV at the Consumer Electronics Show" - https://soylentnews.org/article.pl?sid=16/01/04/0124241
  9. "What is your Video / Monitor Setup?" - https://soylentnews.org/article.pl?sid=16/08/21/093209
  10. "Microsoft and Sony's Emerging 4K Pissing Contest" - https://soylentnews.org/article.pl?sid=16/09/23/2310255
  11. "Original Submission" - https://soylentnews.org/submit.pl?op=viewsub&subid=17930

© Copyright 2026 - SoylentNews, All Rights Reserved

printed from SoylentNews, Is Screen Resolution Good Enough Considering the Fovea Centralis of the Eye? on 2026-02-13 01:37:12