| Title | Code Analyzer Turned Out to be Smarter Than One of its Creators | |
| Date | Monday October 23 2017, @06:48AM | |
| Author | martyb | |
| Topic | ||
| from the MY-code-is-perfect! dept. | ||
I am really astonished by the capabilities of static code analysis. The tool surprised me the other day as it turned out to be smarter and more attentive than I am. I found I must be careful when working with static analysis tools. Code reported by the analyzer often looks fine and I'm tempted to discard the warning as a false positive and move on. I fell into this trap and failed to spot bugs...Even I, one of the PVS-Studio developers.
So, appreciate and use static code analyzers! They will help save your time and nerve cells.
[Ed note: I debated running this story as there was an element of self-promotion (aka Bin Spam), but the submitter has been with the site for a while and has posted informative comments. Besides, I know there have been far too many times when I've seen a compiler complain about some section of my code and I'm thinking there is nothing wrong with it — and then I, finally, see my mistake. Anyone have samples of code where you just knew the compiler or static analyzer was wrong, only to find out otherwise? --martyb]
| Links |
printed from SoylentNews, Code Analyzer Turned Out to be Smarter Than One of its Creators on 2026-01-23 08:38:48