| Title | Tension Over Hubble Constant Continues | |
| Date | Thursday September 19 2019, @09:07AM | |
| Author | Fnord666 | |
| Topic | ||
| from the expanding-like-a-waistline-on-Thanksgiving dept. | ||
Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:
Reproduceability is key to science. A one-time “eureka!” could be the first step in a paradigm shift — or it could be a fluke. It’s the second, third, and hundredth measurements that put theories to the test.
That’s why recent measurements of the universe’s expansion have piqued interest. Even though astronomers have applied multiple methods relying on completely different physics, they’re still getting similar results: Today’s universe appears to be expanding faster than what’s expected based on measurements of the early universe. Can systematic errors explain this discrepancy? Or are new physics required?
Now Wendy Freedman (University of Chicago) and colleagues have posted a new, "middle-of-the-road" measurement on the astronomy preprint arXiv, adding a twist to the ongoing debate. The study will appear in the Astrophysical Journal.
| Links |
printed from SoylentNews, Tension Over Hubble Constant Continues on 2024-04-19 15:21:46