SoylentNews
SoylentNews is people
https://soylentnews.org/

Title    AT&T’s Current 5G is Slower Than 4G in Nearly Every City Tested by PCMag
Date    Tuesday September 15 2020, @07:45AM
Author    Fnord666
Topic   
from the speedy-recovery dept.
https://soylentnews.org/article.pl?sid=20/09/15/040257

upstart writes in with an IRC submission for guy_:

AT&T's current 5G is slower than 4G in nearly every city tested by PCMag;:

AT&T smartphone users who see their network indicators switch from "4G" to "5G" shouldn't necessarily expect that they're about to get faster speeds. In PCMag's annual mobile-network testing, released today, 5G phones connected to AT&T got slower speeds than 4G phones in 21 out of 22 cities.

PCMag concluded that "AT&T 5G right now appears to be essentially worthless," though AT&T's average download speed of 103.1Mbps was nearly as good as Verizon's thanks to a strong 4G performance. Of course, AT&T 5G should be faster than 4G in the long run—this isn't another case of AT&T misleadingly labeling its 4G network as a type of 5G. Instead, the disappointing result on PCMag's test has to do with how today's 5G phones work and with how AT&T allocates spectrum.

The counterintuitive result doesn't reveal much about the actual differences between 4G and 5G technology. Instead, it's reflective of how AT&T has used its spectrum to deploy 5G so far. As PCMag explained, "AT&T's 5G slices off a narrow bit of the old 850MHz cellular band and assigns it to 5G, to give phones a valid 5G icon without increasing performance. And because of the way current 5G phones work, it often reduces performance."

AT&T's 4G network benefits from the aggregation of channels from different frequencies. "The most recent phones are able to assemble up to seven of them—that's called seven-carrier aggregation, and it's why AT&T won [the PCMag tests] last year," the article said.

5G phones can't handle that yet, PCMag analyst Sascha Segan wrote:

But 5G phones can't add as many 4G channels to a 5G channel. So if they're in 5G mode, they're giving up 4G channels so they can use that extremely narrow, often 5MHz 5G channel, and the result is slower performance: faux G. For AT&T, using a 5G phone in testing was often a step backward from our 4G-only phone.


Original Submission

Links

  1. "upstart" - https://soylentnews.org/~upstart/
  2. "AT&T's current 5G is slower than 4G in nearly every city tested by PCMag;" - https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2020/09/atts-current-5g-is-slower-than-4g-in-nearly-every-city-tested-by-pcmag/
  3. "released today" - https://www.pcmag.com/fastest-mobile-networks/2020
  4. "misleadingly labeling" - https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2019/03/atts-5g-e-is-actually-slower-than-verizon-and-t-mobile-4g-study-finds/
  5. "won [the PCMag tests] last year" - https://www.pcmag.com/news/fastest-mobile-networks-2019
  6. "Original Submission" - https://soylentnews.org/submit.pl?op=viewsub&subid=43402

© Copyright 2024 - SoylentNews, All Rights Reserved

printed from SoylentNews, AT&T’s Current 5G is Slower Than 4G in Nearly Every City Tested by PCMag on 2024-04-24 03:58:02