SoylentNews
SoylentNews is people
https://soylentnews.org/

upstart writes:

US Patent Office Proposes Rule To Make it Much Harder To Kill Bad Patents:

So, this is bad. Over the last few years, we've written plenty about the so-called "inter partes review" or "IPR" that came into being about a decade ago as part of the "America Invents Act," which was the first major change to the patent system in decades. For much of the first decade of the 2000s, patent trolls were running wild and creating a massive tax on innovation. There were so many stories of people (mostly lawyers) getting vague and broad patents that they never had any intention of commercializing, then waiting for someone to come along and build something actually useful and innovative... and then shaking them down with the threat of patent litigation.

The IPR process, while not perfect, was at least an important tool in pushing back on some of the worst of the worst patents. In its most basic form, the IPR process allows nearly anyone to challenge a bad patent and have the special Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) review the patent to determine if it should have been granted in the first place. Given that a bad patent can completely stifle innovation for decades this seems like the very least that the Patent Office should offer to try to get rid of innovation-killing bad patents.

However, patent trolls absolutely loathe the IPR process for fairly obvious reasons. It kills their terrible patents. The entire IPR process has been challenged over and over again and (thankfully) the Supreme Court said that it's perfectly fine for the Patent Office to review granted patents to see if they made a mistake.

But, of course, that never stops the patent trolls. They've complained to Congress. And, now, it seems that the Patent Office itself is trying to help them out. Recently, the USPTO announced a possible change to the IPR process that would basically lead to limiting who can actually challenge bad patents, and which patents could be challenged.

The folks over at EFF are rightly raising the alarm about just how bad this could be if it goes into effect.

The U.S. Patent Office has proposed new rules about who can challenge wrongly granted patents. If the rules become official, they will offer new protections to patent trolls. Challenging patents will become far more onerous, and impossible for some. The new rules could stop organizations like EFF, which used this process to fight the Personal Audio "podcasting patent," from filing patent challenges altogether.

Original Submission

1. "upstart" - https://soylentnews.org/~upstart/
2. "US Patent Office Proposes Rule To Make it Much Harder To Kill Bad Patents" - https://www.techdirt.com/2023/06/08/us-patent-office-proposes-rule-to-make-it-much-harder-to-kill-bad-patents/
3. ""IPR"" - https://www.techdirt.com/tag/ipr/
4. "it's perfectly fine" - https://www.techdirt.com/2018/04/26/supreme-court-says-course-patent-office-can-admit-it-made-mistake-dump-bad-patents/
5. "complained to Congress" - https://www.techdirt.com/2020/11/05/people-with-silly-patents-would-really-like-it-if-it-was-harder-to-cancel-them/
6. "possible change to the IPR process" - https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/04/21/2023-08239/changes-under-consideration-to-discretionary-institution-practices-petition-word-count-limits-and
7. "raising the alarm" - https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/06/our-right-challenge-junk-patents-under-threat
8. "proposed new rules" - https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/04/21/2023-08239/changes-under-consideration-to-discretionary-institution-practices-petition-word-count-limits-and
9. "used this process to fight the Personal Audio "podcasting patent,"" - https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/04/patent-office-gives-green-light-eff-challenge-podcasting-patent
10. "Original Submission" - https://soylentnews.org/submit.pl?op=viewsub&subid=59911

printed from SoylentNews, US Patent Office Proposes Rule to Make it Much Harder to Kill Bad Patents on 2023-06-30 05:38:13