Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Submission Preview

Link to Story

An alarm about the influence of standardized tests on American society

Accepted submission by exec at 2017-06-04 21:41:49
News

Story automatically generated by StoryBot Version 0.2.2 rel Testing.
Storybot ('Arthur T Knackerbracket') has been converted to Python3

Note: This is the complete story and will need further editing. It may also be covered
by Copyright and thus should be acknowledged and quoted rather than printed in its entirety.

FeedSource: [HackerNews]

Time: 2017-06-02 20:37:03 UTC

Original URL: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/is-the-u-s-education-system-producing-a-society-of-ldquo-smart-fools-rdquo/ [scientificamerican.com] using utf-8 encoding.

Title: An alarm about the influence of standardized tests on American society

--- --- --- --- --- --- --- Entire Story Below --- --- --- --- --- --- ---

An alarm about the influence of standardized tests on American society

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story [scientificamerican.com]:

We use cookies to provide you with a better onsite experience. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy [scientificamerican.com].

One distinguished psychologist explains why he believes this is so and how to reverse course

BOSTON—At last weekend’s annual meeting of the Association for Psychological Science (APS) in Boston, Cornell University psychologist Robert Sternberg sounded an alarm about the influence of standardized tests on American society. Sternberg, who has studied intelligence and intelligence testing for decades, is well known for his “triarchic theory of intelligence,” which identifies three kinds of smarts: the analytic type reflected in IQ scores; practical intelligence, which is more relevant for real-life problem solving; and creativity. Sternberg offered his views in a lecture associated with receiving a William James Fellow Award [psychologicalscience.org] from the APS for his lifetime contributions to psychology. He explained his concerns to Scientific American.


[An edited transcript of the interview follows.]


What I argue is that intelligence that’s not modulated and moderated by creativity, common sense and wisdom is not such a positive thing to have. What it leads to is people who are very good at advancing themselves, often at other people’s expense. We may not just be selecting the wrong people, we may be developing an incomplete set of skills—and we need to look at things that will make the world a better place.


You know, it’s easy to think of smart people but it’s really hard to think of wise people. I think a reason is that we don’t try to develop wisdom in our schools. And we don’t test for it, so there’s no incentive for schools to pay attention.


Neuroscience. Evolution. Health. Chemistry. Physics. Technology.

Follow us

20% Off a Father’s Day Gift

-- submitted from IRC


Original Submission