Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password


DeathMonkey (1380)

DeathMonkey
(email not shown publicly)

Journal of DeathMonkey (1380)

The Fine Print: The following are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Thursday March 30, 23
10:22 PM
News

A Manhattan grand jury has voted to indict Donald Trump on charges involving payments made during the 2016 presidential campaign to silence claims of an extramarital sexual encounter, the first ever criminal case against a former U.S. president and a jolt to Trump’s bid to retake the White House in 2024.

Donald Trump indicted; 1st ex-president charged with crime

Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Reply to Article Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 5, Funny) by DeathMonkey on Thursday March 30, @10:23PM (50 children)

    by DeathMonkey (1380) on Thursday March 30, @10:23PM (#1298996) Journal

    He finally won a popular vote!

    • (Score: -1, Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 30, @10:45PM (48 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 30, @10:45PM (#1299000)

      Don't we already have pictures of Joe in handcuffs? Or is that Hunter, with whips and chains. Yeah, I guess that's right, Joe is the one showering with little girls.

      • (Score: 3, Funny) by Tork on Thursday March 30, @10:48PM (35 children)

        by Tork (3914) on Thursday March 30, @10:48PM (#1299001)
        Heh. Having a rough day?
        --
        Slashdolt Logic: "25 year old jokes about sharks and lasers are +5, Funny." 💩
        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 30, @11:02PM (34 children)

          by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 30, @11:02PM (#1299009)

          You mean after looking at the poll numbers? Nah, it's all good.

          • (Score: 4, Interesting) by DeathMonkey on Thursday March 30, @11:05PM (12 children)

            by DeathMonkey (1380) on Thursday March 30, @11:05PM (#1299011) Journal

            You mean these results?

            Fox Displays Poll Showing 61% of People Don't Want Donald Trump Back [newsweek.com]

            If so, I agree!

            • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 30, @11:07PM (11 children)

              by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 30, @11:07PM (#1299014)

              Nah, just the real ones, the ones people pay any attention to.

              • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @12:34AM (9 children)

                by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @12:34AM (#1299034)

                Oh, yes, please do tell us more! Which "real" poll numbers are you referring to? Links, or it didn't happen!

                • (Score: 2) by Tork on Friday March 31, @01:33AM (6 children)

                  by Tork (3914) on Friday March 31, @01:33AM (#1299048)
                  When has ANYBODY given a fuck about Runaway's fixation on Biden's polling?
                  --
                  Slashdolt Logic: "25 year old jokes about sharks and lasers are +5, Funny." 💩
                  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @02:44AM (4 children)

                    by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @02:44AM (#1299062)

                    It was your DeathMonkey's poll. And it wasn't a poll about Biden. And runaway had nothing to do with any of it. Other than those little nitpicks, nice job!

                    • (Score: 2) by Tork on Friday March 31, @03:03AM (3 children)

                      by Tork (3914) on Friday March 31, @03:03AM (#1299071)
                      YOU brought up Biden's polling. Heh. So why are you trying to jab with Biden's polls again when none of your earlier attempts succeeded to bunch any undies? Here's a hint: Biden supporters aren't known for wearing blue chinese-manufactured hats.
                      --
                      Slashdolt Logic: "25 year old jokes about sharks and lasers are +5, Funny." 💩
                      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @03:16AM

                        by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @03:16AM (#1299076)

                        YOU brought up Biden's polling.

                        Yes, I'm the one who brought up polling in this thread. But about Trump, not Joe.

                        Either you're fixated on runaway's other threads, or on Joe's blue Depends. Or both, that's okay, too.

                      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @04:32AM (1 child)

                        by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @04:32AM (#1299091)
                        • (Score: 2) by Tork on Friday March 31, @04:48AM

                          by Tork (3914) on Friday March 31, @04:48AM (#1299092)
                          Why are you showing me this?
                          --
                          Slashdolt Logic: "25 year old jokes about sharks and lasers are +5, Funny." 💩
                  • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Friday March 31, @04:54PM

                    by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 31, @04:54PM (#1299189) Journal

                    The post was anonymous. So we don't really know who is fixated on who's pole.

                    --
                    How often should I have my memory checked? I used to know but...
                • (Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @02:38AM

                  by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @02:38AM (#1299060)

                  Which "real" poll numbers are you referring to?

                  Don't know about you, but election results always work for me. And so far, for the last 55 years at least, the numbers have been very (extremely) stable, and still are, despite all your "trump" craziness

                • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @02:41AM

                  by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @02:41AM (#1299061)

                  If you followed that poll link, it wasn't a FOX poll, and FOX was not endorsing it; FOX was quoting another poll. Probably quoting it purely for the comedy value.

              • (Score: 3, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @02:08AM

                by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @02:08AM (#1299050)
          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 30, @11:06PM (20 children)

            by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 30, @11:06PM (#1299013)
            lol hi Runaway!
            • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 30, @11:17PM (19 children)

              by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 30, @11:17PM (#1299017)

              Not even close. Besides, I don't think he is a democrat, so he probably has something else to be doing on weekdays.

              Funny stuff! I was locked-out from posting, even before the -1 points have started to hit me. They've gotta be coming soon. (Dynamic IPs are a good thing.)

              • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 30, @11:28PM (2 children)

                by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 30, @11:28PM (#1299018)
                You've been warned about your tells before, Runaway. ;)
                • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 30, @11:31PM (1 child)

                  by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 30, @11:31PM (#1299020)

                  Nah, he shoots from the hip. I'm a bluffer.

                  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @01:23AM

                    by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @01:23AM (#1299042)

                    He's a fluffer. Different job.

              • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @02:44AM (15 children)

                by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @02:44AM (#1299063)

                ... I don't think he is a democrat...

                Don't know about him, but Trump is the democrat, he's there to scare people from voting for independents

                • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @03:08AM (14 children)

                  by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @03:08AM (#1299073)

                  Yes, Trump was a democrat. He got better.

                  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @03:26AM (5 children)

                    by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @03:26AM (#1299079)

                    Yes, Trump was a democrat.

                    Still is, he's there to keep the audience focused, but he and Clinton are still joined at the hips. To deny the symbiosis is insane. It's all right there in the numbers

                    • (Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Friday March 31, @04:07PM (4 children)

                      by DeathMonkey (1380) on Friday March 31, @04:07PM (#1299180) Journal

                      So "lock her up" was always a lie and you dumbasses fell for it.

                      Yep, sounds about right!

                      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 01, @04:20AM (3 children)

                        by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 01, @04:20AM (#1299290)

                        Heh, typical democrat.. always seeing criticism as republican

                        Of course "lock her up" is a clown show, just like your Russia! Russia! Russia!.. All there for reelection. Can't argue with success, can we?

                        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 02, @11:31PM (2 children)

                          by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 02, @11:31PM (#1299474)

                          The Russian shill is all messed up over people pointing out Ronald and the GOP's complicity with a fascist regime trying to take over a soveriegn nation. Po widdle babby boo

                          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 03, @12:36AM (1 child)

                            by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 03, @12:36AM (#1299483)

                            fascist regime trying to take over a soveriegn nation.

                            Are we talking about Vietnam or Afghanistan/Iraq?

                            Your little McCarthyism shtick does not impress.

                            • (Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 04, @01:45PM

                              by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 04, @01:45PM (#1299702)

                              Doubt you'll find anyone defending the imperialism of the US, but two wrongs don't make a right. Whataboutism only works when the other party is irrationally attached to something like their country or leader. Sad putin fluffer is sad.

                  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by cmdrklarg on Friday March 31, @06:45PM (3 children)

                    by cmdrklarg (5048) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 31, @06:45PM (#1299231)

                    tRump was never a Democrat.

                    He's also never been a Republican either.

                    tRump is tRump. He is an opportunistic asshole who will "align" himself with whatever group can get him the most advantage. He said he was a Democrat not that long ago, but Democrats can see through his bullshit too easily. Much better to align with a group that tends to be more gullible and tribal.

                    --
                    Answer now is don't give in; aim for a new tomorrow.
                    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 01, @04:25AM (2 children)

                      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 01, @04:25AM (#1299291)

                      He's a democrat who plays a republican on TV.. To do what? to scare people out of voting for independents. You too, are in obvious denial of the symbiosis that gives them 98% of the vote, and take their clownish bickering as real opposition

                      • (Score: 2) by cmdrklarg on Monday April 03, @08:58PM (1 child)

                        by cmdrklarg (5048) Subscriber Badge on Monday April 03, @08:58PM (#1299593)

                        You did not read my post. tRump is NEITHER. He simply aligns with the GOP because they are more easily swayed and controlled.

                        --
                        Answer now is don't give in; aim for a new tomorrow.
                        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 04, @03:25AM

                          by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 04, @03:25AM (#1299652)

                          #1299231:

                          tRump[FULLSTOP]

                          #1299593:

                          You did not read my post. tRump[FULLSTOP]

                  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 02, @08:06AM (3 children)

                    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 02, @08:06AM (#1299409)

                    Yes, Trump was a democrat. He got better.

                    So that is what the Repubs are calling the transition from early onset to fly-blow Old-Timer's Disease? Now get off my lawn, and keep yer Government hands off my Medicare! Damn Whippersnappers! Country's really gone to hell.

                    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 03, @04:38AM (2 children)

                      by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 03, @04:38AM (#1299497)

                      President Joe Biden’s administration announced that it would cut Medicare Advantage, after the president has frequently claimed that Republicans want to slash Medicare and Social Security.

                      Breitbart News reported that Biden sponsored a bill in 1975 that would sunset and reauthorize all federal programs, which includes Social Security and Medicare.

                      Joe Biden Moves to Cut Medicare Advantage [breitbart.com]

                      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 03, @08:02AM

                        by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 03, @08:02AM (#1299511)

                        Medicare Advantage is not Medicare, it is private supplementary insurance that lies to and cheats elderly people in their declining years. A lot like Brietbart, in that regard.

                      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 04, @04:50AM

                        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 04, @04:50AM (#1299663)

                        They aren't even cutting Medicare Advantage. There goes Breitbart lying about numbers people won't understand again.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 30, @10:48PM (3 children)

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 30, @10:48PM (#1299002)

        Sick conservative projection. Forgetting it was Trump in the pee-pee tapes? Runaway been frequenting the Golden Showers gent's club, again?

        Lock him up!

      • (Score: 4, Informative) by DeathMonkey on Thursday March 30, @11:00PM (5 children)

        by DeathMonkey (1380) on Thursday March 30, @11:00PM (#1299008) Journal

        “We’re all pretending we’ve got a lot to show for it, because admitting what a disaster it’s been is too tough to digest, But come on. There isn’t really an upside to Trump.” - Tucker Carlson

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 30, @11:05PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 30, @11:05PM (#1299012)

          Just like there isn't an upside being stopped by a vengeful, rogue cop.

        • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday March 31, @01:25PM (3 children)

          by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 31, @01:25PM (#1299144) Journal
          It is interesting how they say one thing in public and another in private. If they weren't speaking truth to power, we'd call it "lying". /sarc
          • (Score: 3, Insightful) by DeathMonkey on Friday March 31, @03:56PM (2 children)

            by DeathMonkey (1380) on Friday March 31, @03:56PM (#1299176) Journal

            We do call it lying.

            You're the ones trying to invent new words for it.

            • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday March 31, @05:09PM (1 child)

              by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 31, @05:09PM (#1299195) Journal
              Who is "you"?
              • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @05:39PM

                by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @05:39PM (#1299207)

                People that read dictionaries and believe their eyes and ears. Sorry you lie too much?

      • (Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @01:10AM (1 child)

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @01:10AM (#1299039)

        Republicans want to see Hunter's but they don't want to see David's.

        • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Friday March 31, @04:59PM

          by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 31, @04:59PM (#1299190) Journal

          Ain't the thing they want to see spelt with two T's?

          --
          How often should I have my memory checked? I used to know but...
    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @12:15AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @12:15AM (#1299031)

      He finally won a popular vote!

      Lock! Him! Up!
      Lock! Him! Up!
      Lock! Him! Up!
      Lock! Him! Up!
      Lock! Him! Up!

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 30, @10:50PM (7 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 30, @10:50PM (#1299003)

    Anybody else thinking about ham sandwiches, right now?

    • (Score: -1, Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 30, @11:47PM (4 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 30, @11:47PM (#1299024)

      When the Bidenistas finally get theirs, the left will be calling it "indicting an ice cream sandwich."

      • (Score: 5, Touché) by Tork on Thursday March 30, @11:59PM (3 children)

        by Tork (3914) on Thursday March 30, @11:59PM (#1299027)
        "Please, please, PLEASE talk about Joe Biden instead!!"
        --
        Slashdolt Logic: "25 year old jokes about sharks and lasers are +5, Funny." 💩
        • (Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @12:07AM (1 child)

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @12:07AM (#1299029)

          Oh, the more we talk about Trump, the more we learn. About the people making those posts.

          Did you know he lost a mighty huge fortune during his first term in office?

          Did you know he likes having sex with pretty women?

          Did you know he called Stormy Daniels Horse Face?

          Did you know Trump drinks twenty cans of Diet Coke a day?

          Did you know Trump wouldn't even care to try to ride a bicycle?

          Did you know that by his own accounting, Trump is a stable genius?

          • (Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 02, @06:04AM

            by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 02, @06:04AM (#1299406)

            Horse Face

            stable genius

            There is something weird and furry going on here. How do we know that horse face wasn't meant as a compliment?

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 02, @08:14AM

          by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 02, @08:14AM (#1299410)

          "Let's Go, Dark Brandon." Whips on the aviator shades.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @02:18AM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @02:18AM (#1299051)

      This is worse than a ham sandwich. Manhattan repeatedly passed on even trying to get an indictment despite the ease in getting one. The reason for that is obvious because they are firmly caught up in the height of the establishment via Wall Street. A change like this came directly from the Republican establishment trying everything they can to take out Trump and the earlier the better. They can read the polls for the primary battle and it doesn't look good for them against the modern day Teflon Don because he doesn't care for the rules.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 04, @01:51PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 04, @01:51PM (#1299705)

        Definitely conspiracy territory, but wouldn't put it past them! Election year, bring out yer dirt!

  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday March 30, @11:02PM (40 children)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday March 30, @11:02PM (#1299010) Journal

    In bringing the charges, the Manhattan district attorney, Alvin Bragg, is embracing an unusual case that had been investigated by two previous sets of prosecutors, both of which declined to take the politically explosive step of seeking Trump’s indictment.

    This is a huge warning sign that this trial will not be easy.

    Federal prosecutors in New York ultimately charged Cohen [Trump's former lawyer Michael Cohen] in 2018 with violating federal campaign finance laws, arguing that the payments amounted to impermissible help to Trump’s presidential campaign. Cohen pleaded guilty to those charges and unrelated tax evasion counts and served time in federal prison.

    Trump was implicated in court filings as having knowledge of the arrangements, but U.S. prosecutors at the time balked at bringing charges against him. The Justice Department has a longtime policy that it is likely unconstitutional to prosecute a sitting president in federal court.

    Bragg’s predecessor as district attorney, Cyrus Vance Jr., then took up the investigation in 2019. While that probe initially focused on the hush money payments, Vance’s prosecutors moved on to other matters, including an examination of Trump’s business dealings and tax strategies.

    Vance ultimately charged the Trump Organization and its chief financial officer with tax fraud related to fringe benefits paid to some of the company’s top executives.

    The hush money matter became known around the D.A.’s office as the “zombie case,” with prosecutors revisiting it periodically but never opting to bring charges.

    Bragg saw it differently. After the Trump Organization was convicted on the tax fraud charges in December, he brought fresh eyes to the well-worn case, hiring longtime white-collar prosecutor Matthew Colangelo to oversee the probe and convening a new grand jury.

    So we have repeated prosecutors passing over this. And notice the highlighted part with respect to ex-lawyer Michael Cohen. Once again, the guilty plea gimmick rears its ugly head. Cohen pleads guilty to this campaign finance charge and some "unrelated tax evasion counts" and avoids more serious jail time for the latter!

    Lastly, the nearest comparison case appears to be that of former North Carolina Senator John Edwards who had two campaign donors pay off his ex-mistress for almost a million dollars. Even then, Edwards got off [npr.org] with one not guilty and hung jury on the rest.

    We'll see what charges they have and what evidence they rely on. But looks to me like this is one of two long shot trials based on election shenanigans. Of the three government trials I know about, here's my present take on the ranking of difficulty: mishandling of classified documents, this trial, and the Georgia election tampering. There's also other trials [businessinsider.com], particularly a civil rape/defamation trial underway.

    • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 30, @11:10PM (13 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 30, @11:10PM (#1299015)

      Ah, good times. Remember when CNN was suggesting Michael Cohen for president?

      • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday March 30, @11:44PM (9 children)

        by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday March 30, @11:44PM (#1299022) Journal
        No, but then I stopped treating CNN as a source of news back in 2005 during the Natalee Holloway [soylentnews.org] thing.

        For example, I gave up permanently on CNN when they had a talking head wading on the beach during the Natalee Holloway disappearance because some investigators were diving off the coast nearby. It was more important to be "live" than to report actual news.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 30, @11:58PM (4 children)

          by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 30, @11:58PM (#1299026)

          Yeah, CNN is following the Fox route to news and becoming even further right wing. The ollyfarts don't want to lose power so they corrupt whatever necessary. Not that CNN was ever that great, strange that you seem to defend Fox while condemning CNN, rational centrist you are not!

          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @12:10AM (2 children)

            by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @12:10AM (#1299030)

            FOX ratings counts are constantly rising. CNN's ratings are uncountable.

            • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday March 31, @02:46AM (1 child)

              by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 31, @02:46AM (#1299064) Journal

              FOX ratings counts are constantly rising.

              So why did they feel the need to lie about the 2020 elections, commiting wholesale slander against Dominion Voting systems and various election officials in order to protect market share? Not winning enough?

              • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @05:55PM

                by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @05:55PM (#1299214)

                So why did they feel the need to lie about the 2020 elections, commiting wholesale slander against Dominion Voting systems and various election officials in order to protect market share? Not winning enough?

                That's why their ratings are rising! Stupid people love drama.

          • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday March 31, @01:33AM

            by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 31, @01:33AM (#1299046) Journal

            strange that you seem to defend Fox

            I've never defended Fox. "Seem" is the key word here. Perceive it differently and I no longer "seem".

        • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @12:28AM (3 children)

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @12:28AM (#1299032)

          No, but then I stopped treating CNN as a source of news back in 2005 during the Natalee Holloway [soylentnews.org] thing.

          I can't help but notice that you seem rather easily triggered when the news is about investigations involving women as crime victims. Why is that? Just curious.

          • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday March 31, @01:33AM (2 children)

            by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 31, @01:33AM (#1299047) Journal

            I can't help but notice that you seem rather easily triggered when the news is about investigations involving women as crime victims.

            I doubt you have noticed such.

            • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 03, @12:53AM (1 child)

              by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 03, @12:53AM (#1299485)

              Are you seriously suggesting that khallow is the New Glenn Beck? [knowyourmeme.com]

      • (Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @12:30AM (2 children)

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @12:30AM (#1299033)

        Ah, good times. Remember when CNN was suggesting Michael Cohen for president?

        Actually, no, I don't. Care to share?

    • (Score: 2, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @01:00AM (2 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @01:00AM (#1299037)

      So we have repeated prosecutors passing over this.

      You seem to have conveniently glossed over this (quoting your quote again):

      Trump was implicated in court filings as having knowledge of the arrangements, but U.S. prosecutors at the time balked at bringing charges against him. The Justice Department has a longtime policy that it is likely unconstitutional to prosecute a sitting president in federal court.

      The reason that the DoJ declined to prosecute was because, as per policy, it is likely unconstitutional to prosecute a sitting President. Ostensibly, it's not because they thought the case was weak. Also note that Trump is no longer President. As an ordinary citizen he is subject to prosecution just like anyone else. Or are you suggesting that Presidents should get lifetime immunity from prosecution?

      And notice the highlighted part with respect to ex-lawyer Michael Cohen. Once again, the guilty plea gimmick rears its ugly head. Cohen pleads guilty to this campaign finance charge and some "unrelated tax evasion counts" and avoids more serious jail time for the latter!

      I'm not sure what your point is here. Care to elaborate further? What do Michael Cohen's guilty pleas have to do with Trump?

      Lastly, the nearest comparison case appears to be that of former North Carolina Senator John Edwards who had two campaign donors pay off his ex-mistress for almost a million dollars. Even then, Edwards got off with one not guilty and hung jury on the rest.

      So, because some other politician managed to beat the rap, Trump should get a pass too? Is that really what you are suggesting? Truly, you are the perfect Republican stooge, khallow!

      • (Score: 1, Offtopic) by khallow on Friday March 31, @02:33AM (1 child)

        by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 31, @02:33AM (#1299057) Journal

        The reason that the DoJ declined to prosecute was because, as per policy, it is likely unconstitutional to prosecute a sitting President. Ostensibly, it's not because they thought the case was weak. Also note that Trump is no longer President. As an ordinary citizen he is subject to prosecution just like anyone else. Or are you suggesting that Presidents should get lifetime immunity from prosecution?

        Meanwhile the New York City/Manhattan DA's office has apparently passed over this multiple times. They have no such alleged policy. As to your last question about giving Trump lifetime immunity, are you suggesting that either? Because otherwise I have yet to run across anyone making such a suggestion.

        And notice the highlighted part with respect to ex-lawyer Michael Cohen. Once again, the guilty plea gimmick rears its ugly head. Cohen pleads guilty to this campaign finance charge and some "unrelated tax evasion counts" and avoids more serious jail time for the latter!

        I'm not sure what your point is here. Care to elaborate further? What do Michael Cohen's guilty pleas have to do with Trump?

        It's a classic and often crooked law enforcement maneuver which I have discussed multiple times in the last few years. For example:

        • Nebulous seditious conspiracy [soylentnews.org] from the January 6 protests.
        • Accused of petty crime [soylentnews.org] in Houston, Texas. One usually got less time in the slammer pleading guilty than taking their case to trial and being found innocent.
        • Also from Houston, Texas, 71 drug charges exonerations [soylentnews.org]. In every case, the defendant had plead guilty and was since found innocent by the state.
        • And the people charged with plotting to kidnap the Michigan government failed to be convicted [soylentnews.org] in federal court (2 acquitted and 2 hung jury). The prosecution's case rested on the testimony of four FBI informants/uncover agents and two people who plead guilty to such charges. It should have been a solid case.
        • A guilty plea from Michael Flynn [soylentnews.org] (of the Trump administration) over lying to FBI agents and unlawful communication that was overturned within a year of getting new legal representation.

        Point is that guilty pleas in the US are poisonous. It's way too easy to bully innocent into pleading guilty or for the guilty to plead to exotic charges to avoid punishment for more mundane ones.

        As an aside, I actually found an example of a plea deal that likely wasn't crooked [soylentnews.org]. Runaway wrote in that journal:

        OxyContin maker Purdue Pharma to plead guilty to 3 criminal charges as part of an $8 billion-plus settlement

        [...]

        Guilty pleas? You seldom see that - these corporates always seem to get away with weasel word statements to the effect, "We acknowledge no wrongdoing blah blah blah . . . "

        Imagine if most crooks could normally just plead "we acknowledge no wrongdoing", pay the fines, and move on. There would be a lot less guilty pleas for starters. Actual guilty pleas would be for the most heinous crimes with strong evidence that they couldn't get out of. It would mean something. Though the the "we acknowledge no..." pleas would not.

        • (Score: 4, Informative) by Zinho on Friday March 31, @12:23PM

          by Zinho (759) on Friday March 31, @12:23PM (#1299140)

          Imagine if most crooks could normally just plead "we acknowledge no wrongdoing", pay the fines, and move on.

          Isn't that called a "no contest" plea? [duckduckgo.com]

          --
          "Space Exploration is not endless circles in low earth orbit." -Buzz Aldrin
    • (Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @01:26AM (13 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @01:26AM (#1299044)

      I love the smell of khallow pontificating about the law in the morning. It smells like, like idiocy.

      • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday March 31, @02:35AM (11 children)

        by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 31, @02:35AM (#1299058) Journal
        It's interesting how so many replies in this thread are about peoples' perception of me rather than what I actually wrote.
        • (Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @03:37AM

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @03:37AM (#1299082)

          Oh do tell!

        • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @06:47AM (9 children)

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @06:47AM (#1299102)

          I wonder why that is. What is your take on it?

          • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday March 31, @10:52AM (8 children)

            by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 31, @10:52AM (#1299118) Journal

            I wonder why that is. What is your take on it?

            That some people need to perceive differently. I can't fix them from way over here.

            • (Score: 0, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @03:05PM (7 children)

              by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @03:05PM (#1299154)

              In typical fashion khallow uses the opposite meaning of words and wonders why people get confused about what is being said.

              • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday March 31, @03:22PM (6 children)

                by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 31, @03:22PM (#1299160) Journal
                You don't need to be an idiot here. Let's review what I'm talking about:
                • Not that CNN was ever that great, strange that you seem to defend Fox while condemning CNN, rational centrist you are not!

                  I've never defended Fox. This is completely fabricated.

                • I can't help but notice that you seem rather easily triggered when the news is about investigations involving women as crime victims.

                  Same.

                • I love the smell of khallow pontificating about the law in the morning. It smells like, like idiocy.

                  Note that no actual idiocy was ever described. No details == no story.

                • So, because some other politician managed to beat the rap, Trump should get a pass too? Is that really what you are suggesting? Truly, you are the perfect Republican stooge, khallow!

                  Completely misses the point (that if past trials are rare and have poor prosecution outcomes, then new trials are likely to run into the same trouble), but eagerly jumps to the "perfect Republican stooge" narrative.

                My view is that in each of these cases, the poster could have simply chosen to view my post in a reasonable light without the pretentious, sneering drama. As the saying going, "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." Here, we have the converse. If these posters stop believing in straw men caricatures of me, then their objections go away: I cease to "defend" Fox News, I cease to "trigger" on hypothetical female victims, I cease to be an idiot, and I cease to be a Republican stooge. It's surprisingly simple and completely out of my hands. Physicians, go fix thyselves.

                • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 02, @11:36PM (1 child)

                  by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 02, @11:36PM (#1299476)

                  If you did not busy yourself defending and downolaying the GOP's crime spree with the trump administration you would have a lot less sneering. Since you still have a problem acknowledging the GOP's insurrection we do not hold out much hope for you. Sad that any decent points you might bring up on occasion will be buried under your hubris!

                  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday April 04, @02:28AM

                    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday April 04, @02:28AM (#1299639) Journal

                    If you did not busy yourself defending and downolaying the GOP's crime spree with the trump administration you would have a lot less sneering.

                    Again, if you chose to interpret my actions differently, then the drama disappears. There's no point to caring about broken perceptions!

                • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 03, @01:19PM (1 child)

                  by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 03, @01:19PM (#1299527)

                  "trigger" on hypothetical female victims

                  Looks like somebody can't get laid!

                  You're holding it wrong, khallow! The correct way to accomplish counterrevolution against second wave feminism and the notion that women are people is chivalry and pedestalization, which you are failing to uphold. You're an incel, and a homosexual man who originates fascism by dint of perverse sexual orientation, so we should throw you into the army. That'll straighten you up and teach you respect for women.

                  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday April 04, @02:29AM

                    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday April 04, @02:29AM (#1299641) Journal

                    The correct way to accomplish counterrevolution against second wave feminism and the notion that women are people is chivalry and pedestalization, which you are failing to uphold.

                    Again, if you chose to interpret my actions differently, then the drama disappears. There's no point to caring about broken perceptions!

                • (Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 03, @10:53PM (1 child)

                  by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 03, @10:53PM (#1299604)

                  My view is that in each of these cases, the poster could have simply chosen to view my post in a reasonable light without the pretentious, sneering drama.

                  Your "view" is myopic and ego-centric, khallow! You cannot see that no one is able to view your posts in a reasonable light, because they are not reasonable. The drama is real, not pretentious, and the sneers are well deserved. If you want people to take you seriously, you need to grow up, dump the racist libertarianism (AKA, Republic party policy), and start arguing in good faith. Until that happens, you will reap what you sew.

                  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday April 04, @02:32AM

                    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday April 04, @02:32AM (#1299643) Journal

                    Your "view" is myopic and ego-centric, khallow! You cannot see that no one is able to view your posts in a reasonable light, because they are not reasonable. The drama is real, not pretentious, and the sneers are well deserved. If you want people to take you seriously, you need to grow up, dump the racist libertarianism (AKA, Republic party policy), and start arguing in good faith. Until that happens, you will reap what you sew.

                    Again, if you chose to interpret my actions differently, then the drama disappears. There's no point to caring about broken perceptions!

                    Three dumbass straw men that were an utter waste of my time. Too bad that you don't have anything better to do with your life.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @02:58AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @02:58AM (#1299069)

        I love the smell of khallow pontificating about the law in the morning. It smells like, like idiocy.

        You've been smelling too much teen spirit.

    • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @03:48AM (8 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @03:48AM (#1299085)

      Former President Donald Trump has been the target of many political attacks in recent years.

      The most recent political attack was Thursday’s reported New York grand jury indictment, which will likely be unsealed by the Manhattan district attorney’s office in the coming days.

      Trump’s indictment is just one more attack in a long line of political offensives throughout the years. Below are the four times Trump has been the target of a witch hunt by the left:

      1. Raid on Mar-a-Lago
      2. Impeachment 2, January 6 Riot
      3. Impeachment 1, “Perfect Phone Call”
      4. “No Collusion” Mueller Report

      Four Times the Left Witch-Hunted Trump: ‘Never Been Anything Like It’ [breitbart.com]

      • (Score: 4, Insightful) by Tork on Saturday April 01, @01:05AM (7 children)

        by Tork (3914) on Saturday April 01, @01:05AM (#1299272)
        1. Where they found a shit-ton of documents he wasnt supposed to have.
        2. Acquitted because his party was in power.
        3. We're seeing the results of that 'perfect phone call' today.
        4. What Mueller said and what Barr said are in conflict.


        You should do a search for McConnell's statements about Trump's culpability on Jan 6th. ;)
        --
        Slashdolt Logic: "25 year old jokes about sharks and lasers are +5, Funny." 💩
        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 03, @07:01AM (6 children)

          by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 03, @07:01AM (#1299507)
          1. No they didn't.
          2. No they weren't.
          3. The son-of-a-bitch was fired.
          4. "No Collusion."

          You should do a search for Jan 6th videos. That sad, “QAnon Shaman” guy is now recovering in a halfway house, after spending 800-days as a political prisoner.

          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 03, @04:54PM (5 children)

            by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 03, @04:54PM (#1299552)

            Jeebus, yall be fucking dumb.

            • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 03, @06:06PM (4 children)

              by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 03, @06:06PM (#1299568)

              PRINCETON, NJ — Scientists have concluded a years-long study confirming the indisputable correlation between people putting trust in their government and people also eating paint chips.

              The study results come at a time when more and more people believe our country's financial, political, and social problems can be solved by a powerful central government, just like Venezuela.

              "Not only did paint chip eaters trust their government," said study co-author, Dr. Reynolds Swarthington while struggling to maintain a straight face, "but trust in government also ranked high among gasoline sniffers, toad lickers, and oven cleaner huffers."

              During the five-year study following ingesters of leaded paint flakes, researchers stumbled upon myriad other conditions among the group, such as believing money grew on magical trees, socialism had benefits, and gender was some type of fluid.

              Scientists Discover Strong Correlation Between Trusting Government And Eating Paint Chips [babylonbee.com]

              • (Score: 2) by Tork on Monday April 03, @10:06PM (2 children)

                by Tork (3914) on Monday April 03, @10:06PM (#1299601)

                "Not only did paint chip eaters trust their government," said study co-author, Dr. Reynolds Swarthington while struggling to maintain a straight face, "but trust in government also ranked high among gasoline sniffers, toad lickers, and oven cleaner huffers."

                Heh. I wonder how many people who guffawed over this while slapping their knee still have weathered Trump signs in their yard.

                --
                Slashdolt Logic: "25 year old jokes about sharks and lasers are +5, Funny." 💩
                • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 04, @12:43AM (1 child)

                  by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 04, @12:43AM (#1299614)

                  I wonder how many people who guffawed over this while slapping their knee actually noticed that this so-called "news" story is from Babylon Bee.

                  • (Score: 2) by Tork on Tuesday April 04, @12:50AM

                    by Tork (3914) on Tuesday April 04, @12:50AM (#1299616)
                    Here's one [soylentnews.org] example of that happening. It wasn't posted for knee-slapping purposes, tho....
                    --
                    Slashdolt Logic: "25 year old jokes about sharks and lasers are +5, Funny." 💩
              • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 04, @01:49PM

                by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 04, @01:49PM (#1299703)

                Conservative satire is just mean spirited hate packaged as humor. The Onion does it right mostly, actually playing off absurdity and not naked hatred.

  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by Azuma Hazuki on Friday March 31, @01:20AM (9 children)

    by Azuma Hazuki (5086) on Friday March 31, @01:20AM (#1299041) Journal

    I can't help but feel this is too little too late, but am certainly not going to sneeze at it. Now, what I really hope happens is he holes up in Mar-a-Lago and DeSantis has to make the decision to extradite him. That, one way or another, will utterly sink the entire GOP. DeSantis is fucked no matter what he does in that scenario.

    --
    I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @03:16AM (2 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @03:16AM (#1299075)

      Thank you for using your intelligence and word power to increase divisiveness. Bravo!

      • (Score: 2) by Azuma Hazuki on Sunday April 02, @03:36AM (1 child)

        by Azuma Hazuki (5086) on Sunday April 02, @03:36AM (#1299400) Journal

        Any time, fuckstick :) Remember, every time a MAGA moron cries, an angel gets its wings!

        --
        I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 02, @10:55PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 02, @10:55PM (#1299470)

          How I wish that was the case. May then the most religious in my family wouldn't be the worst of the bunch.

    • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @03:28AM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @03:28AM (#1299080)

      Happy Trans Day Of Vengeance!

      At the supermarket, I was checked by a celebrator. You could more accurately call it "blocked," and by a beefy blocker.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @07:50PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @07:50PM (#1299243)

        Beefy Blocker?

        Hoss and Joe and Alpha know every rock and pine
        No one works, fights, or eats, like those boys in Maybelline
        Here we stand in the middle of a grand Hazuma
        With a gun and a rope and a face full of Lancome,
        We planted our hateful tree, we got hold of pants full of gold, Hazuma
        With a houseful of vengeance where the rainbow ends, how rich can a fellow be?

    • (Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @03:45AM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @03:45AM (#1299084)

      That, one way or another, will utterly sink the entire GOP.

      Oh please! Just... stop.. I'll bet you a whole dollar that congress will remain perfectly balanced and 95% of them will get reelected again, and again...

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 01, @04:32AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 01, @04:32AM (#1299292)

        Our dear zumi, downmodder in chief, and as redundant as ever, we'll hear all the same shit after the next election too, maybe from the other side of Niagara Falls

    • (Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Friday March 31, @04:03PM

      by DeathMonkey (1380) on Friday March 31, @04:03PM (#1299179) Journal

      If there has always been a case here then this was always the one that would go first since it's the oldest. These other, potentially bigger, cases are simply newer and still need more time to work through the process.

      Hell, I contested a speeding ticket once and it took a whole damn year to finally get resolved....

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @11:48PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @11:48PM (#1299266)

      And Disney still won't let him on the "Good" rides.

  • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @05:31AM (9 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @05:31AM (#1299094)

    "I Believe this Witch-Hunt will backfire massively on Joe Biden. The American People realize exactly what the Radical Left Democrats are doing here. Everyone can see it. So our Movement, and our Party - united and strong - will first defeat Alvin Bragg, and then we will defeat Joe Biden, and we are going to throw every last one of these Crooked Democrats out of office so we can MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!"

    - President Donald J. Trump (45)

    • (Score: 2, Funny) by khallow on Friday March 31, @11:15AM (8 children)

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 31, @11:15AM (#1299125) Journal
      The election was stolen from Trump in 2020. By constitutional law, he's barred [wikipedia.org] from a third election. You'll have to find someone else.

      The amendment prohibits anyone who has been elected president twice from being elected again. Under the amendment, someone who fills an unexpired presidential term lasting more than two years is also prohibited from being elected president more than once.

      • (Score: -1, Redundant) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @03:07PM (7 children)

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @03:07PM (#1299155)

        Bwahahahahahahha

        There it is! Khallow finally drops the Ayn Rand Lustibertian costume and reveals the true MAGAt underneath! Election stolen and everything wompwomplololol

        • (Score: 2, Informative) by khallow on Friday March 31, @03:24PM (5 children)

          by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 31, @03:24PM (#1299162) Journal
          Woosh?
          • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Friday March 31, @05:19PM

            by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 31, @05:19PM (#1299200) Journal

            I actually did get your joke. I wonder if anyone else did.

            --
            How often should I have my memory checked? I used to know but...
          • (Score: 2) by Tork on Friday March 31, @06:20PM (3 children)

            by Tork (3914) on Friday March 31, @06:20PM (#1299227)
            Yep, that AC didn't read your post in its entirety.
            --
            Slashdolt Logic: "25 year old jokes about sharks and lasers are +5, Funny." 💩
            • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday March 31, @07:38PM

              by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 31, @07:38PM (#1299242) Journal
              Or they did read and understand that post in its entirety, and decided to write that anyway. I get some pretty stupid ACs.
            • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 01, @12:16AM (1 child)

              by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 01, @12:16AM (#1299268)

              Not the win you were hoping for - for President Trump to be ineligible, someone would first have to uncover the 8 million votes for DJT they accidentally 'misplaced'.

              Which all points to The Donald and vice-presidential nominee Marjorie T-G returning bigglier than ever in 2024.

              Of course if the justice system actually did their due diligence on the January 6th investigation, a scenario would come to pass in which one could avoid all this circus tomfoolery.

              • (Score: 1) by khallow on Sunday April 02, @01:50PM

                by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Sunday April 02, @01:50PM (#1299431) Journal

                Of course if the justice system actually did their due diligence on the January 6th investigation, a scenario would come to pass in which one could avoid all this circus tomfoolery.

                Trump is circus tomfoolery. Just like Satan, the circus is within Trump and he cannot leave it for he brings it with him.

        • (Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 01, @10:05AM

          by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 01, @10:05AM (#1299310)

          Modded '-1 Redundant'.

          And absolutely deserved a downmod. But it's not really flamebait, nor is it a troll or offtopic. And it hadn't been upvoted, so I couldn't use overrated (which it certainly was. Heck, at -1 it still is).

          It's not actually redundant either, but a clear case of poor reading comprehension and crappy reasoning skills too.

          So tell me, was redundant the best choice? If not, let me know and I'll use something different in the future.

          Thanks!

          N.B,: Not a fan of khallow -- yuck! But it was amusing. And it would be a great troll on jackass and his magatastic moron supporters. Sounds like we need a viral meme for this. Can't you just see some enterprising debate moderator at a primary debate asking the questions:
          Moderator: "Mr. Trump, you claim you won election to the presidency on 2016 and 2020. Is that your contention?"
          Trump: "Of course! I won bigly both times! I am the most popular and best president ever! Much better than that Lincoln jerk! And I did more for the niggers^W coloreds^W blacks than he did! And the election was stolen from me!"
          Moderator: "If that's the case, the 22nd amendment says 'The amendment prohibits anyone who has been elected president twice from being elected again.' It doesn't say anything about serving as president after winning. As such, if you won the presidential election in 2020, you are constitutionally barred from running again, in 2024 or any other year. Your thoughts?"
          Trump: [fill in the blank]

          Hee hee!

  • (Score: 0, Redundant) by Runaway1956 on Friday March 31, @12:11PM (15 children)

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 31, @12:11PM (#1299136) Homepage Journal

    Anyone who doesn't realize this whole thing is political, is either stupid, or just not paying attention. The goal here, is to prevent Trump from mounting a proper reelection campaign. That has been the goal all along.

    I'll be listening to the whining when the tables have turned.

    And, neither Trump nor Biden is doing this country any favors. Both should have retired decades ago. Old fools need to get out of the way, and pass the baton to someone with energy and vision.

    It's good to see that I'm so very popular, that half of you thought earlier comments in this discussion were mine. LOL, I'm living free in your heads!!

    --
    Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
    • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @03:10PM (2 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @03:10PM (#1299156)

      Why do people punish criminals? Don't you know he is rich?

      If you were any more bankrupt Satan would have to pimp you out.

      How many times did you not vote for trump again? And why do you care soooo much for him?

      • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday March 31, @03:28PM (1 child)

        by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 31, @03:28PM (#1299164) Journal

        If you were any more bankrupt Satan would have to pimp you out.

        Presumably for Runaway coins, amirite?

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @05:41PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @05:41PM (#1299208)

          Runaway is a cryptogrifter? Not exactly surprising.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @04:46PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @04:46PM (#1299186)

      Old fools need to get out of the way, and pass the baton to someone with energy and vision.

      So, I assume that you will be immediately stepping aside to let someone else with more "energy" and "vision" to take up the baton?

    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by DannyB on Friday March 31, @05:28PM (3 children)

      by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 31, @05:28PM (#1299203) Journal

      this whole thing is political

      Just as the things the MAGAs do are political.

      If Trump really did break the laws of the state of New York, it is perfectly within all the rules for the prosecutors to try to get a conviction. If that conviction happens to make Trump ineligible to run again, according to the rules, that is exactly how it should be.

      Prosecuting Trump for actual crimes using actual evidence does not sink to the low of stuffing the SCOTUS to take away women's rights.

      I'll be listening to the whining when the tables have turned.

      The only side that ever seems to whine when the tables are turned are the MAGAs.

      One set of rules for thee and another for me.

      By all rights, Trump should have been impeached. Not doing that was purely political.

      Trump is currently involved in other legal messes that don't appear to be going well. There are so many [businessinsider.com] it's difficult to keep them all straight.

      --
      How often should I have my memory checked? I used to know but...
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @05:44PM (2 children)

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @05:44PM (#1299209)

        Nah, liberals whine about GOP fascism plenty, it just hits different when it is justified and that makes Republucans super mad. The trend is consistent, they want separate rules and they hate when people point out their flaws. GOP is politics for narcissists.

        • (Score: 3, Insightful) by DannyB on Friday March 31, @06:06PM

          by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 31, @06:06PM (#1299223) Journal

          I would also point out the hypocrisy.

          Republicans: Lock Her Up!

          Also Republicans: No matter what Donald Trump did, if you lock him up, there will be civil war.

          --
          How often should I have my memory checked? I used to know but...
        • (Score: 4, Touché) by Tork on Friday March 31, @08:08PM

          by Tork (3914) on Friday March 31, @08:08PM (#1299246)
          It is funny how a good deal of the rebuttals from the right are about silencing criticisms. "We voted for Trump cos you criticized us. Keep talking, we'll do it again!" Or "the real problem with Jan 6th is the hurt-feely words you used to describe it!" Or wanting to remove 230. Or wanting to be able to legally run over protesters. Or using tortured logic to ban books or avoid talking about the history of the south in an educational setting.

          Watch out, incoming protest signs! Start your engines!!
          --
          Slashdolt Logic: "25 year old jokes about sharks and lasers are +5, Funny." 💩
    • (Score: 2) by Tork on Friday March 31, @06:40PM (1 child)

      by Tork (3914) on Friday March 31, @06:40PM (#1299229)

      Anyone who doesn't realize this whole thing is political, is either stupid, or just not paying attention. The goal here, is to prevent Trump from mounting a proper reelection campaign. That has been the goal all along. I'll be listening to the whining when the tables have turned.

      Hilariously what this particular indictment is about is Trump using a fixer to clean up his closet-filled skeletons so he could run for President. He wasn't actually obligated to ever sleep with Stormy Daniels, but... hey, you're ready to finger wag the Dems over a fanfic you've written about future events! ;)

      LOL, I'm living free in your heads!!

      You do talk about male erotica a lot...

      --
      Slashdolt Logic: "25 year old jokes about sharks and lasers are +5, Funny." 💩
      • (Score: 4, Insightful) by DeathMonkey on Friday March 31, @08:08PM

        by DeathMonkey (1380) on Friday March 31, @08:08PM (#1299245) Journal

        If he'd have paid that fixer with his own money he would be fine. But instead he used campaign funds and called it legal costs which is also known as fraud.

    • (Score: 3, Informative) by cmdrklarg on Friday March 31, @07:04PM (4 children)

      by cmdrklarg (5048) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 31, @07:04PM (#1299235)

      Well, well, well. Mr. "I'm not defending tRump!" is defending tRump again.

      Face it - if you or I were caught doing the shit that tRump has provably done, we would already be rotting in a federal prison for a very long time. tRump hasn't been arrested yet because he's wealthy and has somehow convinced a large number of people that he's their leader.

      You're "popular" here because you're like tRump: a loudmouth whose behavior gives us something point at and laugh.

      --
      Answer now is don't give in; aim for a new tomorrow.
      • (Score: 3, Informative) by DeathMonkey on Friday March 31, @08:10PM (3 children)

        by DeathMonkey (1380) on Friday March 31, @08:10PM (#1299247) Journal

        His lawyer claims he will turn himself in for arraignment next Tuesday:

        No handcuffs but a mug shot: Trump to be arraigned Tuesday [apnews.com]

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @11:45PM (2 children)

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @11:45PM (#1299265)

          I was so hoping for a perp walk and a full body cavity search.

          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 01, @02:18AM (1 child)

            by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 01, @02:18AM (#1299275)

            Even if Trump enters the justice system, it is still the second justice system designed for the rich.

            • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 03, @03:30PM

              by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 03, @03:30PM (#1299540)

              Indeed. If Trump ever does spend a single day in jail for his (many) crimes it will most likely be at Club Fed. I understand they have tennis courts, a library, etc. Almost makes me wish I could be jailed there.

  • (Score: 2) by NotSanguine on Friday March 31, @05:55PM (1 child)

    But DeathMonkey beat me to it.

    'bout fuckin' time, if you ask me (you didn't, but I like to share). It's a start, but as a friend said to me a while ago, wake me up when we get to this point [youtube.com].

    She was being metaphorical, but the idea does leave one with a nice warm feeling, no?

    Local news here in NYC has been covering this extensively.

    When Trump (falsely) claimed he was going to be arrested a week and a half ago urging folks to protest, Trump's supporters (all three of them) showed up at the courthouse that evening to protest.

    And last night, when the indictment was handed down, three (perhaps the same three?) people showed at Trump Tower to do the same.

    Such a yuuuge outpouring of support! In fact, it was the biggest protest in the history of the world! Even bigger than the inauguration crowd!

    I'll say it again. 'bout 'fuckin' time!

    --
    No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by DannyB on Friday March 31, @06:11PM

      by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 31, @06:11PM (#1299225) Journal

      Even bigger than the inauguration crowd!

      Some would say the inauguration crowd size was Trump's first lie in office. What a way to start off a presidency - with a lie, over something trivial.

      I would suggest that the first lie was actually the oath of office. Over something so important it should shock everyone of any political persuasion. But by the time he took the oath, nothing was considered shocking by that point.

      --
      How often should I have my memory checked? I used to know but...
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @06:30PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 31, @06:30PM (#1299228)

    This thread should be posted on the front page as a reminder and cautionary tale for us all.

(1)