Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password


fustakrakich (6150)

fustakrakich
(email not shown publicly)

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. Messages [soylentnews.org]

Journal of fustakrakich (6150)

The Fine Print: The following are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Saturday September 18, 21
03:22 AM
Rehash

Oops!

But "He said he is 'fully responsible for this strike and the tragic outcome.'"

"We apologize, and we will endeavor to learn from this horrible mistake," another guy said. I'm sure they will.. uh huh

But hey! "at least one of those people that were killed was an ISIS facilitator.". Not even, eh?

The 10 dead were all members of the same extended family, relatives told NBC News, and included the seven children. Some were as young as 2 and 3.

Milley said "Trump is nuts", no wait, I'm sorry, that's a misquote, what he really said was, "... at this point, we think the procedures were correctly followed, and it was a righteous strike." (from "over the horizon")

Way to go, guys!

And the press! There's speculation the story was delayed/ignored for some time...

EDIT:
Hmm, The Silence of the Dems is so deafening! *Can't Touch This!*

EDIT 2:
AOC - democrat socialist? Hardly! democrat socialite..

Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Reply to Article Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 18 2021, @03:32AM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 18 2021, @03:32AM (#1179055)

    New terrorists created.

    • (Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Monday September 20 2021, @03:43PM

      by DeathMonkey (1380) on Monday September 20 2021, @03:43PM (#1179695) Journal

      I'll give the Biden admin some minor props for coming clean.

      Previous administrations, including Obama's, were blatantly lying to the American public about Afghanistan and would have likely just stuck with the cover story.

      THE AFGHANISTAN PAPERS A secret history of the war [washingtonpost.com]

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 20 2021, @10:18PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 20 2021, @10:18PM (#1179863)

      Walk softly and carry a... hey! The dog kept my stick!

  • (Score: 2, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 18 2021, @03:59AM (60 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 18 2021, @03:59AM (#1179067)

    This after all comes out following a new Byline Times report [bylinetimes.com] which found that “at least 5.8 to 6 million people are likely to have died overall due to the War on Terror– a staggering number which is still probably very conservative.”

    It also comes out two months after whistleblower Daniel Hale was sentenced to nearly four years in prison [theintercept.com] for leaking secret government information [jacobinmag.com] about America’s psychopathic civilian-slaughtering drone assassination program [theintercept.com].

    It also comes a few months after a Code Pink report found [mintpressnews.com] that the US and its allies have been dropping an average of 46 bombs per day in the so-called War on Terror for the last twenty years.

    Do you remember seeing an average of 46 news reports a day on bombings conducted by the US and its allies? Do you remember even reading about one single US bombing per day in the mainstream news? I don’t. The US power alliance has for decades been continuously raining explosives from the sky on impoverished people in the Global South and the mainstream news reports on almost none of those instances, much less launches an in-depth investigation into whether each one killed who the military claims they killed.

    https://caitlinjohnstone.com/2021/09/18/where-was-all-the-investigative-journalism-on-us-airstrikes-the-last-20-years/ [caitlinjohnstone.com]

    Now that the occupation is "over", it's safe to write about. Anyway, it's better to keep people distracted from domestic politics by directing their outrage at the invulnerable machine of the MIC.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 18 2021, @04:20AM (10 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 18 2021, @04:20AM (#1179075)

      What a ridiculous term. Afghanistan is north of the equator.

      Greetings from the southern hemisphere.

      • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Saturday September 18 2021, @04:29AM

        by fustakrakich (6150) on Saturday September 18 2021, @04:29AM (#1179078) Journal

        Afghanistan is north of the equator.

        But south of the Mason-Dixon line

        --
        La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 18 2021, @04:37AM (8 children)

        by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 18 2021, @04:37AM (#1179080)

        Global South is a politically correct replacement for Third World, but if you look at the map it makes sense. Afghanistan and the other Global South countries are below most of the United States and Europe.

        • (Score: 3, Touché) by Runaway1956 on Sunday September 19 2021, @12:31AM (6 children)

          by Runaway1956 (2926) on Sunday September 19 2021, @12:31AM (#1179329) Homepage Journal

          Yes, we were searching desperately for "a politically correct replacement for Third World". That search has been ongoing as a top priority, both in the US as well as the UN, for about 50 years. Thank God some millennial was around to save the day! /sarcasm

          --
          Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 19 2021, @03:49AM (3 children)

            by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 19 2021, @03:49AM (#1179351)

            Third World stopped making sense when the soviets collapsed and the "Second World" disappeared.

            • (Score: 1, Troll) by Runaway1956 on Sunday September 19 2021, @04:16AM

              by Runaway1956 (2926) on Sunday September 19 2021, @04:16AM (#1179358) Homepage Journal

              Third world will still be appropriate for a long time to come. Much of Africa, for instance, is aligning with China today. Big parts of Asia are aligned, or are aligning with China. And, there are still countries that don't want to be aligned with either the Western Bloc, or with the Chinese Bloc. The names and faces are changing, but the concepts aren't going away any time soon.

              --
              Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
            • (Score: 3, Touché) by Mykl on Sunday September 19 2021, @10:44PM (1 child)

              by Mykl (1112) on Sunday September 19 2021, @10:44PM (#1179528)

              The origin of the term "Third World" doesn't come from rankings, but instead a reference to Third Person.

              • First World - my world. I am talking about me in the first person
              • Second World - your world. Technically, second world countries are my peers who I speak to, but are not me. The term's not really used at all these days.
              • Third World - their world. Those countries that I talk about ("them") but don't talk to
              • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday September 20 2021, @04:49AM

                by khallow (3766) on Monday September 20 2021, @04:49AM (#1179593) Journal

                The origin of the term "Third World" doesn't come from rankings, but instead a reference to Third Person.

                One can see that's broken merely by looking at your definitions of First and Second World. What's the first and second person viewpoint analogues that would allow both Russia and China to be Second World, but the US and Japan to be First World?

                Second World - your world. Technically, second world countries are my peers who I speak to, but are not me. The term's not really used at all these days.

                What's missing from that tale is that these were divided by ideology not some rhetorical point of view. And communism, the ideology of the Second World failed badly, almost Nazi-level badly. That's why "Second World" is gone without a trace.

          • (Score: 4, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 19 2021, @07:00PM (1 child)

            by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 19 2021, @07:00PM (#1179497)
            • (Score: -1, Troll) by Runaway1956 on Sunday September 19 2021, @08:11PM

              by Runaway1956 (2926) on Sunday September 19 2021, @08:11PM (#1179509) Homepage Journal

              I notice they didn't stop in Baltimore, or Detroit, or other shithole Democrat run cities. But, yeah, 'Murica ain't so rich as a lot of people imagine, and neglected communities are neglected.

              --
              Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
        • (Score: 2, Interesting) by khallow on Sunday September 19 2021, @04:36AM

          by khallow (3766) on Sunday September 19 2021, @04:36AM (#1179363) Journal

          Global South is a politically correct replacement for Third World, but if you look at the map it makes sense. Afghanistan and the other Global South countries are below most of the United States and Europe.

          I use "developing world" and "developed world". "Global South" is just a weak observation of a geographical quirk. "Developing world" also is an acknowledgement of what I think will be the biggest story of the 21st Century - the elevation of almost all of humanity to developed world status - being on or near the cutting edge of human civilization.

          By the end of the century, I think who is on top versus not will depend on things like legal and cultural infrastructure rather than on raw wealth or historical advantages like being a superpower 80 years ago.

    • (Score: 0, Troll) by Mockingbird on Saturday September 18 2021, @05:19AM (44 children)

      by Mockingbird (15239) on Saturday September 18 2021, @05:19AM (#1179097) Journal

      You know, Osama bin Laden was never convicted in a court of law as being responsible for the 9-11 attacks. They just killed him, and members of his family, because. Extra-judicial extra-warfare assassinations is how America does business now. Look up the Maumau rebellion in Kenya! Sun never sets on British war crimes.

      • (Score: 1) by khallow on Sunday September 19 2021, @04:49AM (43 children)

        by khallow (3766) on Sunday September 19 2021, @04:49AM (#1179367) Journal

        You know, Osama bin Laden was never convicted in a court of law as being responsible for the 9-11 attacks.

        Ok, walk us through that process. How do you convict someone whom you can't legally arrest? War fundamentally is not a law enforcement activity. It makes no sense to treat it as such.

        Trial in absentia is no better than extra-judicial extra-warfare assassinations.

        They just killed him, and members of his family, because.

        What would be the point of a trial when you refuse to accept the legal reasons for the trial? It'd just be a "trial, because". At least now, bin Laden is dead eliminating your need for a trial, because.

        • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Monday September 20 2021, @02:19AM (42 children)

          by fustakrakich (6150) on Monday September 20 2021, @02:19AM (#1179562) Journal

          The war itself was predicated on his guilt, which was assumed, not proven

          --
          La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
          • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 20 2021, @04:27AM (1 child)

            by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 20 2021, @04:27AM (#1179591)

            Here you are repeating Taliban talking points [washingtonpost.com]. There actually is evidence linking Osama bin Laden to the 9/11 attacks [npr.org]. For that matter, Osama bin Laden claimed responsibility [theguardian.com] for the 9/11 attacks.

            I'll certainly agree that the war was horribly planned from the start, that it was mismanaged over and over again, and that multiple administrations lied about the situation in Afghanistan. The Afghanistan Papers [washingtonpost.com] make a pretty good case that the American people were repeatedly lied to about the war. I will certainly agree that the war was botched at every turn and that both Bush-era AUMFs have been repeatedly stretched to Goatse-level proportions to justify absurd abuses of military power. But repeating Taliban talking points that imply Osama bin Laden might have been innocent is just asinine.

            • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Monday September 20 2021, @05:31AM

              by fustakrakich (6150) on Monday September 20 2021, @05:31AM (#1179597) Journal

              There actually is evidence...

              No, there isn't. Those vids are unreliable.

              Osama bin Laden claimed responsibility for the 9/11 attacks.

              He did not. "purported to be..." That's not evidence. You have nothing

              --
              La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
          • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday September 20 2021, @04:32AM (39 children)

            by khallow (3766) on Monday September 20 2021, @04:32AM (#1179592) Journal
            "Assumed not proven"? Sounds like you just condemned your own post. Here's my take. We've had twenty years to find evidence of bin Laden's innocence. Hasn't happened yet. And law enforcement remains a poor tool for handling wars.
            • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Monday September 20 2021, @05:38AM (38 children)

              by fustakrakich (6150) on Monday September 20 2021, @05:38AM (#1179600) Journal

              We've had twenty years to find evidence of bin Laden's innocence. Hasn't happened yet.

              You had twenty years to find evidence of bin Laden's guilt. Hasn't happened yet. And you circled back around on your war bullshit. It was started on a lie. They (and you) assumed guilt to sell and start the whole affair. You are merely parroting the same hearsay broadcast by one of the belligerents in the war effort. You have no evidence

              --
              La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
              • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday September 20 2021, @04:37PM (37 children)

                by khallow (3766) on Monday September 20 2021, @04:37PM (#1179721) Journal
                Like here [soylentnews.org]? Sorry, not buying your excuses.
                • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Monday September 20 2021, @04:48PM (36 children)

                  by fustakrakich (6150) on Monday September 20 2021, @04:48PM (#1179731) Journal

                  As already pointed out, all hearsay, no evidence.. not buying your bullshit

                  --
                  La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
                  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday September 20 2021, @06:18PM (35 children)

                    by khallow (3766) on Monday September 20 2021, @06:18PM (#1179769) Journal

                    The videotape -- discovered in a private home in Jalalabad, Afghanistan -- shows a relaxed bin Laden discussing the attacks in Arabic with another man who appears to be a cleric. On the tape, bin Laden says he was pleasantly surprised by the amount of destruction caused at the World Trade Center; he only expected the top portion of the twin towers to collapse.

                    According to a translated transcript issued by the Pentagon, bin Laden says the attacks on the World Trade Center did more damage than expected. "...we calculated in advance the number of casualties from the enemy, who would be killed based on the position of the tower," he says, according to the transcript. "We calculated that the floors that would be hit would be three or four floors. I was the most optimistic of them all. (...Inaudible...) due to my experience in this field, I was thinking that the fire from the gas in the plane would melt the iron structure of the building and collapse the area where the plane hit and all the floors above it only. This is all that we had hoped for."

                    Video of bin Laden not under duress stating that the 911 attacks caused more damage than he expected (particularly, the line "we calculated in advance" is strong evidence of planning and conspiracy. To call it "hearsay" is abuse of the language.

                    • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Monday September 20 2021, @06:28PM (34 children)

                      by fustakrakich (6150) on Monday September 20 2021, @06:28PM (#1179777) Journal

                      The videotape -- discovered in a private home

                      Uh huh... just *fell out of the truck...* Did they find the missing Al Gore votes too? Putting an official seal on your conspiracy theories doesn't make them any less wacky. You still have only hearsay. It's ok, we know it's strictly business, as all wars are

                      --
                      La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
                      • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday September 20 2021, @07:43PM (33 children)

                        by khallow (3766) on Monday September 20 2021, @07:43PM (#1179809) Journal
                        Sorry, that's not what hearsay means. Hearsay means stuff like rumors, which can't be substantiated. A video is physical evidence. I gather you're trying to claim that the video is faked, but have no words in your language to describe that.
                        • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Monday September 20 2021, @08:08PM (32 children)

                          by fustakrakich (6150) on Monday September 20 2021, @08:08PM (#1179822) Journal

                          You are merely defending people with the means and very powerful motives to lie. Just another case of the cops planting the "evidence" [themarshallproject.org] (list only shows who got caught). You take everything they say on pure faith, no questions asked, and demand conformity from the rest of us.

                          --
                          La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
                          • (Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday September 21 2021, @02:13AM (31 children)

                            by khallow (3766) on Tuesday September 21 2021, @02:13AM (#1179900) Journal

                            You are merely defending people with the means and very powerful motives to lie.

                            And has already been noted, so are you. That's why I go to evidence, not hearsay, such as the video that was mentioned. You meanwhile are a creator of hearsay, telling us to disregard evidence because an involved party has interests. We'd have all kinds of exciting crime, if we stooped to that level of foolishness in law.

                            • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Tuesday September 21 2021, @02:35AM (30 children)

                              by fustakrakich (6150) on Tuesday September 21 2021, @02:35AM (#1179904) Journal

                              And has already been noted, so are you.

                              Nope, I am defending nobody, just a concept of truth, which is absent in your assertions. Everything you have presented so far is hearsay until it is cross examined.

                              Here's a link that you won't read. But in case anyone else is interested... [smh.com.au]

                              You are merely reciting *agreed upon fiction*

                              --
                              La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
                              • (Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday September 21 2021, @03:53AM (29 children)

                                by khallow (3766) on Tuesday September 21 2021, @03:53AM (#1179920) Journal

                                just a concept of truth, which is absent in your assertions

                                Sounds like your "concept" should be, if it isn't already, absent from your assertions too. /sarc

                                • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Tuesday September 21 2021, @04:06AM (28 children)

                                  by fustakrakich (6150) on Tuesday September 21 2021, @04:06AM (#1179930) Journal

                                  :-) Wake me when you find evidence

                                  --
                                  La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
                                  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday September 22 2021, @06:34PM (27 children)

                                    by khallow (3766) on Wednesday September 22 2021, @06:34PM (#1180461) Journal
                                    Wakey wakey. Check that AC post. It had evidence!
                                    • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Wednesday September 22 2021, @06:45PM

                                      by fustakrakich (6150) on Wednesday September 22 2021, @06:45PM (#1180466) Journal

                                      No so.. I already linked to the story of the fakes.

                                      --
                                      La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
                                    • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Wednesday September 22 2021, @06:49PM

                                      by fustakrakich (6150) on Wednesday September 22 2021, @06:49PM (#1180467) Journal
                                      --
                                      La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
                                    • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Wednesday September 22 2021, @06:53PM (24 children)

                                      by fustakrakich (6150) on Wednesday September 22 2021, @06:53PM (#1180468) Journal

                                      Sorry, just can't stop!

                                      But US experts who have heard it generally support the conclusion by US law enforcement officials that it probably is bin Laden speaking.

                                      That is hardly "evidence" by any rational standard. But, war mongers unite!

                                      --
                                      La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
                                      • (Score: 2, Funny) by khallow on Thursday September 23 2021, @01:57AM (23 children)

                                        by khallow (3766) on Thursday September 23 2021, @01:57AM (#1180632) Journal
                                        Of course, it's evidence. Sorry, you need more than that.
                                        • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Thursday September 23 2021, @02:18AM (22 children)

                                          by fustakrakich (6150) on Thursday September 23 2021, @02:18AM (#1180636) Journal

                                          :-) You win the internet. Can't argue with a goof

                                          --
                                          La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
                                          • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday September 23 2021, @02:31AM (21 children)

                                            by khallow (3766) on Thursday September 23 2021, @02:31AM (#1180641) Journal
                                            I just did that and won.

                                            To summarize my side, videos of admission of guilt are evidence. Further, we have a lot more than just that, such as transfers of funds from Al Qaeda associates to the 911 teams. One could say that the evidence is weak due to the US's capability to fake shit or the weak provenance of the evidence. But to just declare that evidence is not evidence is just irrational and wrong.
                                            • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Thursday September 23 2021, @02:42AM (20 children)

                                              by fustakrakich (6150) on Thursday September 23 2021, @02:42AM (#1180647) Journal

                                              You failed to prove the veracity of the videos. The other tapes were already proven to be fake by the same standards you use. Destroys all your credibility. You merely choose to believe what the conspiracy theorists tell you. You lose. You get nothing. But go ahead and believe you won, whatever it is you think you "won". I like to watch

                                              --
                                              La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
                                              • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday September 23 2021, @12:32PM (19 children)

                                                by khallow (3766) on Thursday September 23 2021, @12:32PM (#1180713) Journal

                                                You failed to prove the veracity of the videos.

                                                So what? It's still evidence.

                                                • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Thursday September 23 2021, @06:14PM (18 children)

                                                  by fustakrakich (6150) on Thursday September 23 2021, @06:14PM (#1180795) Journal

                                                  Most likely false "evidence". You are making the proverbial "bad faith argument", and yet another appeal to authority, with no attempt to find the truth.

                                                  --
                                                  La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
                                                  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday September 27 2021, @04:45PM (17 children)

                                                    by khallow (3766) on Monday September 27 2021, @04:45PM (#1181905) Journal
                                                    Says the guy who only focused on the video and his alleged disputation of that video.
                                                    • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Monday September 27 2021, @10:03PM (16 children)

                                                      by fustakrakich (6150) on Monday September 27 2021, @10:03PM (#1182014) Journal

                                                      Still false until publicly, transparently cross examined, along with all the other "evidence" that was quickly buried in the landfill. Too many secrets to believe the lies. You simply choose to believe otherwise, a simple and, typical for you, appeal to authority all the way.

                                                      --
                                                      La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
                                                      • (Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday September 28 2021, @07:23PM (15 children)

                                                        by khallow (3766) on Tuesday September 28 2021, @07:23PM (#1182393) Journal

                                                        Still false until publicly, transparently cross examined, along with all the other "evidence" that was quickly buried in the landfill.

                                                        "Quickly buried in the landfill"? What would you be referring to? I find it remarkable how little effort you put into any justification, much less this one. So what of these narrative elements that apparently doesn't meet your approval? Are you willing to provide any evidence to support your claims instead of cliches?

                                                        • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Tuesday September 28 2021, @07:30PM (1 child)

                                                          by fustakrakich (6150) on Tuesday September 28 2021, @07:30PM (#1182400) Journal

                                                          The remains of the towers/planes were quickly hauled off and buried before real, "disinterested" investigators could see. What you have is garbage, simply a view from one side. The secrecy discredits all accusations. Why are you so gullible? Is it convenience?

                                                          --
                                                          La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
                                                          • (Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday October 05 2021, @12:17PM

                                                            by khallow (3766) on Tuesday October 05 2021, @12:17PM (#1184423) Journal

                                                            The remains of the towers/planes were quickly hauled off and buried before real, "disinterested" investigators could see.

                                                            They had to. You can't keep these environmental messes in dense urban areas forever.

                                                            And what real, "disinterested" investigators are you referring to? Say the dudes who were convinced the Jews were behind it before the first plane hit?

                                                            The secrecy discredits all accusations.

                                                            What secrecy was involved in the above "quickly hauled off" narrative?

                                                        • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Tuesday September 28 2021, @07:51PM (12 children)

                                                          by fustakrakich (6150) on Tuesday September 28 2021, @07:51PM (#1182409) Journal

                                                          Are you willing to provide any evidence to support your claims instead of cliches?

                                                          Show yours and I'll show you mine. Opps, we already have. All you have shown is speculation. At least I give something plausible, more probable than official conspiracy theories. In no way, can you justify the invasion

                                                          --
                                                          La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
                                                          • (Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday September 28 2021, @09:46PM (11 children)

                                                            by khallow (3766) on Tuesday September 28 2021, @09:46PM (#1182458) Journal
                                                            Ok. Glancing [wikipedia.org] at Wikipedia, I see the following:
                                                            • First, we have motive. For example, bin Laden issued two fatwas in 1996 and 1998 against the US. The latter stated "We do not have to differentiate between military or civilian. As far as we are concerned, they [Americans] are all targets." The [sic] is from Wikipedia.
                                                            • There are other attacks on civilian targets traced to Al Qaeda such as the bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993 and the embassy bombings of 1998 in Africa. So a history of attacking civilian targets and a previous attack on the World Trade Center.
                                                            • A detailed history of planning the 911 attacks, including interrogation of the alleged planners.
                                                            • Communication and support between the "Hamburg cell" that formed the core of the 911 attack group and al Qaeda, including several meetings between the head of the 911 attack group and bin Laden.
                                                            • Funding for the group (they allegedly spent up to half a million dollars) is vague, but some has allegedly been traced to a high ranking Pakistani intelligence officer friendly with the Taliban - who in turn were employing Al Qaeda soldiers at the time.

                                                            I grant that this is poor for a civilian target. But good enough for a military target.

                                                            • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Wednesday September 29 2021, @01:51AM (10 children)

                                                              by fustakrakich (6150) on Wednesday September 29 2021, @01:51AM (#1182539) Journal

                                                              The motive for lying to invade Afghanistan and the domestic power grab is much greater. The means? Please! But yeah, putting an official seal on your story makes it much more believable, right? All you still have are "allegedly"s and "supposedly"s... Ya can't prove a thing, not without getting caught in your own net

                                                              --
                                                              La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
                                                              • (Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday September 29 2021, @12:01PM

                                                                by khallow (3766) on Wednesday September 29 2021, @12:01PM (#1182700) Journal

                                                                The motive for lying to invade Afghanistan and the domestic power grab is much greater.

                                                                Greater than what? You can't even be bothered to put a complete argument out there.

                                                                But yeah, putting an official seal on your story makes it much more believable, right?

                                                                Evidence that you continue to claim isn't there, in other words. Sorry, buddy, but evidence for anything like this always has an official seal to it. Even if it's merely after the fact with someone else doing most of the work.

                                                              • (Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday September 29 2021, @12:11PM (8 children)

                                                                by khallow (3766) on Wednesday September 29 2021, @12:11PM (#1182702) Journal
                                                                I also find it amusing that you're more concerned about the evidence provider (classic ad hominem) than whether the evidence is wrong.
                                                                • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Wednesday September 29 2021, @07:40PM (7 children)

                                                                  by fustakrakich (6150) on Wednesday September 29 2021, @07:40PM (#1182893) Journal

                                                                  The provider has a long history of lying before and since Afghanistan, Iraq is a classic case, no reason is given to believe that story any more or less than your Bin Laden one. There's no reason to believe anything they say. The "ad hominem" is well earned. In fact it's not an ad hominem, it's the truth. Your liars are unbelievable. They are lying right now, about war, the "debt", public health, it's a pretty long list.

                                                                  The simple fact is that you choose to believe lies, because of where they come from, yours is the proverbial appeal to authority

                                                                  --
                                                                  La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
                                                                  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday September 30 2021, @12:59AM (6 children)

                                                                    by khallow (3766) on Thursday September 30 2021, @12:59AM (#1182998) Journal

                                                                    The provider has a long history of lying before and since Afghanistan, Iraq is a classic case, no reason is given to believe that story any more or less than your Bin Laden one.

                                                                    That's why I went off the evidence not off the provider.

                                                                    • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Thursday September 30 2021, @01:04AM (5 children)

                                                                      by fustakrakich (6150) on Thursday September 30 2021, @01:04AM (#1182999) Journal

                                                                      The "evidence", by nature of its "provider", is likely false. Your simple appeal to authority does not make it otherwise.

                                                                      --
                                                                      La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
                                                                      • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday September 30 2021, @03:32AM (4 children)

                                                                        by khallow (3766) on Thursday September 30 2021, @03:32AM (#1183018) Journal

                                                                        The "evidence", by nature of its "provider", is likely false.

                                                                        Based on what evidence?

                                                                        • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Thursday September 30 2021, @03:42AM (3 children)

                                                                          by fustakrakich (6150) on Thursday September 30 2021, @03:42AM (#1183019) Journal

                                                                          Previous history. It's definitely a good indicator of present/future performance. Your "evidence" is presented by people with very big reasons to lie. As was already shown by the link I provided, that you probably didn't read... You just want to believe lies from certain people and parrot their propaganda here

                                                                          --
                                                                          La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
                                                                          • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday September 30 2021, @05:30AM (2 children)

                                                                            by khallow (3766) on Thursday September 30 2021, @05:30AM (#1183037) Journal
                                                                            Again, where's your evidence? I'll note that your refutation of the evidence above just focused on the video of the NPR story. even providing a dubious counterstudy without even considering the rest of the evidence. Second, now you're claiming that all this evidence was fully provided by the US, as if that were true.

                                                                            Googling around, I see that bin Laden has claimed responsibility in more places than just a video found in a home. For example, we have this video [wikipedia.org]:

                                                                            On October 29, 2004, at 21:00 UTC, Al Jazeera broadcast excerpts allegedly from a videotape of Osama bin Laden addressing the people of the United States; in this video, he accepts responsibility for the September 11 attacks, condemns the Bush government's response to those attacks, and presents those attacks as part of a campaign of revenge and deterrence motivated by his witnessing of the destruction in the Lebanese Civil War in 1982. News analysts speculated that the release of the video was timed to influence the 2004 U.S. presidential election, which would take place four days later.

                                                                            This was aired on a Qatar radio station, not a US source.

                                                                            Since you have refused to discuss the rest of my evidence list, those points remain uncontested.

                                                                            • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Thursday September 30 2021, @06:02AM (1 child)

                                                                              by fustakrakich (6150) on Thursday September 30 2021, @06:02AM (#1183046) Journal

                                                                              allegedly from a videotape of Osama bin Laden.. You always leave out the inconvenient parts

                                                                              When I become more interested, I'll look into your "Qatar radio station".. I hope you don't consider them to be "neutral" or anything...

                                                                              News analysts speculated that the release of the video was timed to influence the 2004 U.S. presidential election, which would take place four days later.

                                                                              Yes, very interesting point there, not in your favor either.

                                                                              You still have nothing but conjecture, but to you, if it's official it is fact. That is called *appeal to authority*. You epitomize it.

                                                                              --
                                                                              La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
                                                                              • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday October 01 2021, @01:04AM

                                                                                by khallow (3766) on Friday October 01 2021, @01:04AM (#1183252) Journal

                                                                                When I become more interested, I'll look into your "Qatar radio station".. I hope you don't consider them to be "neutral" or anything...

                                                                                I consider them to not be the US.

                                                                                You still have nothing but conjecture, but to you, if it's official it is fact. That is called *appeal to authority*. You epitomize it.

                                                                                "Conjecture" which happens to be from bin Laden. And what's the point of tarring all my evidence with the "official" label? Have you even thought about what wouldn't be official?

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 18 2021, @06:32AM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 18 2021, @06:32AM (#1179110)

      After thinking on it some more - could this all be just to distract from Israel's crackdown on Palestine over the jailbreak?

      • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 18 2021, @09:15AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 18 2021, @09:15AM (#1179152)

        Of course not. It's to distract you from looking too closely at Sleepy Joe, propped up in front of tne news cameras.

    • (Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Monday September 20 2021, @03:38PM (1 child)

      by DeathMonkey (1380) on Monday September 20 2021, @03:38PM (#1179692) Journal

      Anyway, it's better to keep people distracted from domestic politics by directing their outrage at the invulnerable machine of the MIC.

      Lucky for us the American public doesn't give flying fuck about foreign policy then!

      They didn't care about the previous 20 years of death and destruction while we were the ones doing it and they definitely won't care about the next 20 years at the hands of the Taliban once Niki Minaj's cousin's friend's second testicle explodes.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 22 2021, @07:34AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 22 2021, @07:34AM (#1180324)

        second testicle explodes

        So what you're saying is that it's only a matter of time before he busts a nut?

  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 18 2021, @05:26AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday September 18 2021, @05:26AM (#1179102)

    ICFI/SEP/IWA-RFC: US pulls last of its troops from Afghanistan after chaotic evacuation [wsws.org]

    The bloody legacy of the 20-year US intervention was underscored on the eve of the final evacuation with a “preemptive” drone strike carried out against what the US military had claimed was a car carrying a suicide bomber. It wiped out 10 Afghan civilians, nine of them from the same family. The victims included seven children aged 2 to 12 along with their father and brother—a 19-year-old student—and a neighbor....

    The drone massacre constitutes one more in a countless number of such atrocities carried out in the 20-year neocolonial war and occupation that has ravaged Afghanistan....

    Reports from Kabul paint a picture of horror at the site of the drone strike. Outraged neighbors of the slaughtered Ahmadi family told Al Jazeera of “human flesh stuck to the walls. Bones fallen into bushes. Walls stained with blood.” One neighbor said of one of the youngest children killed, “We only found his legs.”

    The children killed in the attack included three two-year-olds and two three-year-olds.

    The missile struck just as the children’s father returned from work and they ran out to his car to greet him.

    The father, Zemarai, had worked for the aid agency Nutrition and Education International, resulting in the family’s receiving a US Special Immigrant Visa. They had packed their bags and were waiting for a call telling them to go to the Kabul airport. The other adult killed in the strike was a former member of the Afghan National Army.

    Ramin Yousufi, a relative of the slaughtered family, told the BBC that the drone strike had brought “hell in our lives.”

    “Why did they kill our family, our children?” he asked, sobbing. “Seven children burned up. We can’t identify them from their faces, their bodies.”

  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Sunday September 19 2021, @04:26AM

    by Runaway1956 (2926) on Sunday September 19 2021, @04:26AM (#1179362) Homepage Journal

    EDIT:
    Hmm, The Silence of the Dems is so deafening!

    Silence of the rams?. [youtube.com]

    --
    Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 19 2021, @07:08PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 19 2021, @07:08PM (#1179498)
  • (Score: 3, Touché) by takyon on Sunday September 19 2021, @11:27PM (4 children)

    by takyon (881) <{takyon} {at} {soylentnews.org}> on Sunday September 19 2021, @11:27PM (#1179532) Journal

    I predict someone will make a stink about it at the Emmys tonight. Or at least Afghanistan in general.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(1)