Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Journal of mcgrew (701)

The Fine Print: The following are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Thursday January 20, 22
04:02 PM
Code

English isn’t English. There’s British English, and American English (and probably Australian English as well). It doesn’t bother me that the only difference between humor and humour depends on whether you’re looking it up in the OED or Webster’s.
        It’s illogical for them to call a car’s trunk a “boot”. Where did that insanity come from? It’s a trunk! A boot is footwear, a trunk is a box that stores stuff.
        It’s illogical to use a three syllable word that has a one syllable synonym, as in the British lift, that we call an “elevator”. Lifting and elevating are the same thing! Calling a lift an “elevator” is stupid. You may say “but an American named Otis invented them.” No, he didn’t. Elevators date back to ancient Rome and are older than the English language.
        But none of that bothers me.
        What does bother me is an ignorant Britishism that we Americans have started to copy, speaking and writing as if a company or a team is plural, as in “Microsoft are”. That drives me crazy! Microsoft is ONE company. The British (and now we) say “the team are playing…” NO! It’s ONE team! How many individual football teams (we’re wrong calling American football “football”) are there in Great Britain? The team is and the teams are.
        Yes, a team has several players, and a company may have hundreds of employees, but a car has thousands of parts. Why do you say “the car is” rather than “the car are?”
        Because that would be stupidly illogical, that’s why. As stupid and illogical as saying “Microsoft are”.

Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Reply to Article Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 2) by drussell on Thursday January 20 2022, @04:19PM (11 children)

    by drussell (2678) on Thursday January 20 2022, @04:19PM (#1214202) Journal

    The British (and now we) say “the team are playing…” NO! It’s ONE team! How many individual football teams (we’re wrong calling American football “football”) are there in Great Britain? The team is and the teams are.

    We say "the team is playing today," but we don't say "the Calgary Flames is playing today" or "the Patriots is winning the game."

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 20 2022, @04:32PM (3 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 20 2022, @04:32PM (#1214211)

      Correct, a company can be both a singular and plural.

      A company of wolves is approaching.
      A company of wolves are approaching.

      I've never written a company letter that didn't use "we" and it's "we are" not "we is".

      • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Thursday January 20 2022, @09:20PM (2 children)

        by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Thursday January 20 2022, @09:20PM (#1214345) Journal

        Rarely is the question asked . . . is our children learning? [youtube.com]
        -- US President George W Bush

        He almost says "are", but fortunately corrects himself.

        --
        If you think a fertilized egg is a child but an immigrant child is not, please don't pretend your concerns are religious
        • (Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 20 2022, @09:40PM (1 child)

          by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 20 2022, @09:40PM (#1214356)

          I think we is misunderestimating McGrew.

          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 25 2022, @11:20PM

            by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 25 2022, @11:20PM (#1262923)

            Don't shoot him.

    • (Score: 2, Informative) by khallow on Friday January 21 2022, @12:51AM (5 children)

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday January 21 2022, @12:51AM (#1214407) Journal
      Both those names are plural in the first place. If it were the Calgary Flame or the Patriot, then the singular verb tense would be appropriate.
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 21 2022, @01:55AM (4 children)

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 21 2022, @01:55AM (#1214424)

        What about Delta Air Lines? The plural can be implicit in a company name too, depending on context. "Microsoft is the new owner of Activision/Blizzard, they are perusing a controlling position in the video game market". In this context, "the company" as "they" means the Board and Executives - it's already implicit in the subject.

        The British is wrong!
        Yes, they are!

    • (Score: 3, Interesting) by FatPhil on Saturday January 22 2022, @01:38PM

      by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Saturday January 22 2022, @01:38PM (#1214778) Homepage
      Are they acting as one consolidated entity, or as a group of individuals? Most of the time they're acting as a group of individuals, in which case the plural is more appropriate. The fallacy mcgrew seems to espousing is that mere aggregation necessarily creates a gramatical singleton. It doesn't. I frequently both singular and plural for the same entities in different contexts, the choice is actually *extra information* about how I'm viewing those agents and their actions. It's not wrong, it's nuance. Rigidity would worsen the expressiveness of the language.
      --
      Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
  • (Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 20 2022, @05:28PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 20 2022, @05:28PM (#1214232)

    So there is a people who are using their words wrong. Got it.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 20 2022, @08:42PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 20 2022, @08:42PM (#1214327)

      According to "The Burned-Out Stoner's Guide To English"

  • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Thursday January 20 2022, @06:56PM (6 children)

    by fustakrakich (6150) on Thursday January 20 2022, @06:56PM (#1214277) Journal

    We call a lift an elevator, and we call a tissue a Kleenex. Old trademarks tend to stick

    --
    La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
    • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Thursday January 20 2022, @09:15PM (5 children)

      by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Thursday January 20 2022, @09:15PM (#1214341) Journal

      An Escalator could also be called a lift.

      Brits say Sellotape [wikipedia.org] where yanks say "scotch tape".

      --
      If you think a fertilized egg is a child but an immigrant child is not, please don't pretend your concerns are religious
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 20 2022, @09:23PM (1 child)

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 20 2022, @09:23PM (#1214347)

        Weird, the rest of us say 'sticky tape' because it's sticky.

        • (Score: 3, Funny) by DannyB on Friday January 21 2022, @03:36PM

          by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Friday January 21 2022, @03:36PM (#1214508) Journal

          Masking tape is also sticky. Duck / Duct tape is also sticky. Frog tape is sticky. Gorilla tape is sticky. Audio recording tape . . . ideally should not be sticky.

          Q. Why do all NASA missions always include Duct tape?
          A. Because Duct Tape is like the force. It has a dark side, it has a light side, and it binds the universe together.

          --
          If you think a fertilized egg is a child but an immigrant child is not, please don't pretend your concerns are religious
      • (Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 20 2022, @10:09PM (1 child)

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 20 2022, @10:09PM (#1214366)

        In "The Stoner's Guide" it's called an upper and a downer. Sellotape is a bad trip.

        • (Score: 2, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 21 2022, @01:44AM

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 21 2022, @01:44AM (#1214423)

          No True Scottish Tape ...

      • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Saturday January 22 2022, @01:55PM

        by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Saturday January 22 2022, @01:55PM (#1214781) Homepage
        Escalators are slide-and-lifts
        --
        Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 20 2022, @07:48PM (10 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 20 2022, @07:48PM (#1214307)

    My least favorite are all the words being switched to -ate. "The announcer commented" to "The announcer commentated."

    • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Thursday January 20 2022, @09:09PM

      by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Thursday January 20 2022, @09:09PM (#1214339) Journal

      You aren't sure which direction you are facing. In Australia you need to get "orientated". In the rest of the world you need to get "oriented".

      Along with British, American and Australian English, let's also not forget Canadian English. Where "about" is pronounced like "a boot".

      --
      If you think a fertilized egg is a child but an immigrant child is not, please don't pretend your concerns are religious
    • (Score: 3, Funny) by Farmer Tim on Thursday January 20 2022, @11:17PM (1 child)

      by Farmer Tim (6490) on Thursday January 20 2022, @11:17PM (#1214387)
      You’re hearing the wrong thing: it’s actually “common ‘tatered”, which means intellectually emulating an ordinary potato.
      --
      Came for the news, stayed for the soap opera.
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 21 2022, @03:01AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 21 2022, @03:01AM (#1214439)

        Ok BIG FARMA!

    • (Score: 2) by krishnoid on Thursday January 20 2022, @11:52PM

      by krishnoid (1156) on Thursday January 20 2022, @11:52PM (#1214389)

      Then y'alls really going to hate the far future [youtu.be].

    • (Score: 2) by mcgrew on Saturday January 22 2022, @12:49AM

      by mcgrew (701) <publish@mcgrewbooks.com> on Saturday January 22 2022, @12:49AM (#1214680) Homepage Journal

      Another pet peeve, but no worse than "irregardless".

      --
      Carbon, The only element in the known universe to ever gain sentience
    • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Saturday January 22 2022, @01:59PM (4 children)

      by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Saturday January 22 2022, @01:59PM (#1214782) Homepage
      Are you really unable to distinguish between the action of commenting, and the action of commentating? Fortunately, those of us who are are happy that there are two terms available to us in order to preserve precision.
      --
      Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
      • (Score: 2) by mcgrew on Saturday January 22 2022, @02:46PM (3 children)

        by mcgrew (701) <publish@mcgrewbooks.com> on Saturday January 22 2022, @02:46PM (#1214787) Homepage Journal

        The trouble is "commentate" is usually misused over here. And it's a Britishism we Americans have adopted. If you're giving yesterday's news, you're commenting.

        com·men·tate
        /ˈkämənˌtāt/
        Learn to pronounce
        verbBritish
        verb: commentate; 3rd person present: commentates; past tense: commentated; past participle: commentated; gerund or present participle: commentating

                report on an event as it occurs, especially for a news or sports broadcast; provide a commentary.
                "they commentate on live Monday matches"

        --
        Carbon, The only element in the known universe to ever gain sentience
        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 23 2022, @02:59AM (2 children)

          by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 23 2022, @02:59AM (#1214914)
          It's as stupid as people saying "object orientated" instead of "object oriented."

          And one I see everywhere in buth the UK and USA - "one of the only". It's either one of the few or the only. This started in the 90s with the "everyone gets passed because we don't want to hurt their feelings." Bad parents are to blame.

          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 23 2022, @03:20AM

            by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 23 2022, @03:20AM (#1214916)

            in buth the

            Well, you're fired.

          • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Sunday January 23 2022, @08:19AM

            by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Sunday January 23 2022, @08:19AM (#1214953) Homepage
            False, you have a very simplistic understanding of the meaning of "only". It doesn't mean "uniquely", it simply means that there are no others apart from the one - or ones - that are being referred to.

            Delete this post after reading it, as it was intended for your eyes only. But hurry up, you're allowed only 30 seconds to read it.
            --
            Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
  • (Score: 2) by acid andy on Thursday January 20 2022, @09:24PM (4 children)

    by acid andy (1683) Subscriber Badge on Thursday January 20 2022, @09:24PM (#1214349) Homepage Journal

    Congratulations mcgrew, you got more responses than my tirade against the reduplicative copula (and "don't got") [soylentnews.org]. I love a good bit of linguistic pedantry.

    It’s illogical for them to call a car’s trunk a “boot”. Where did that insanity come from?

    According to someone on stackexchange [stackexchange.com]:

    In the case of the English "boot", the origin is that in the 18th and 19th centuries, the coachman used to sit on a locker where he could store, among other things, his boots. For this reason, this was termed the "boot locker" and after a while an additional compartment situated at the rear of the coach was used, also called for the same reason the "boot" (for short).

    and:

    Look a little deeper: boot in the sense of the storage compartment of a car comes from an older word sometimes spelled "bote", meaning "box". The "bote" or "boot" of an old horsedrawn coach was originally an extra seat or place to stand on the side or back of the coach for a footman or someone else riding on the outside. It was built like a box.

    Sounds plausible.

    --
    Master of the science of the art of the science of art.
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 20 2022, @09:45PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 20 2022, @09:45PM (#1214360)

      Look a little deeper: boot in the sense of the storage compartment of a car comes from an older word sometimes spelled "bote", meaning "box".

      This explanation seems a little on the proverbial elephants proboscis.

    • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Saturday January 22 2022, @02:09PM (2 children)

      by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Saturday January 22 2022, @02:09PM (#1214783) Homepage
      I'd always presumed that boot was something to do with /boite/ < Fr. Were that true, as trunk and box are the same concept, there'd be no point fussing over who's right or wrong, that's just bikeshedding. I do prefer the "it's no longer a box" aspect of "boot", whereas the "it's not a trunk" feature of "truck" grates somwehat. Words changing as concepts change is a positive feature of a language.
      --
      Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
      • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday January 22 2022, @02:30PM (1 child)

        by Anonymous Coward on Saturday January 22 2022, @02:30PM (#1214784)

        It's probably not a coincidence that "box" has replaced "trunk" in the American lexicon.

        • (Score: 3, Interesting) by MostCynical on Sunday January 30 2022, @08:30PM

          by MostCynical (2589) on Sunday January 30 2022, @08:30PM (#1217062) Journal

          The company is going broke...
          The company's board members have decided...

          on the silly differences:

          swimming trunks have nothing to do with elephants, unless the person wearing them is very well endowed.

          the box seat is not like a cricket box

          At least hood and bonnet both referred to headwear before the were used for the engine cover on a vehicle.

          An ass can kick your arse in the UK and Australia.. an ass will kick your ass in the US (context is everything)

          --
          "I guess once you start doubting, there's no end to it." -Batou, Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by hendrikboom on Thursday January 20 2022, @11:02PM (2 children)

    by hendrikboom (1125) on Thursday January 20 2022, @11:02PM (#1214383) Homepage Journal

    Don't forget Indian English. There's a huge population of English speakers in India. Indian English has its own peculiarities. One I've noticed is an increased use of the progressive tenses.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 21 2022, @05:32AM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 21 2022, @05:32AM (#1214458)

      Sanskrit influence. What bothers me is the disappearance of the perfect tense in American English. Some one "pleaded" guilty? What is wrong with the perfectly cromulent perfect tense, since the "action in the past is completed", They "pled". Crucial distinction in case between a mere past, and a completed past, to distinguish from an on-going past. Not like some one "bleeded" to death, or is "well-breeding". Grammar matters, unless, well, unless you have "Stopped the Steel".

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 21 2022, @02:33PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 21 2022, @02:33PM (#1214493)

        I've never heard anyone use your example incorrectly, but I do see it in other places, "loaned" is especially common.

  • (Score: 4, Funny) by Runaway1956 on Thursday January 20 2022, @11:51PM

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Thursday January 20 2022, @11:51PM (#1214388) Homepage Journal

    The Highway Act of 1835 mandated that everyone drive on the wrong side of the road. The reasons for the act weren't really understood, until 1865, when Lewis Carroll's Wonderland stories were published. A rational man would expect the error to have been corrected, after mind altering drugs were outlawed in the UK.

    --
    Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 21 2022, @07:18AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 21 2022, @07:18AM (#1214466)

    there is wide confusion of whether it's the hormones that caused the different neural pathways to be activated, or whether the neural pathways activated the secretion of the relevant hormones.
    there is also the question of "do mcgrew simply need a cookie?"

  • (Score: 2) by BK on Friday January 21 2022, @03:49PM

    by BK (4868) on Friday January 21 2022, @03:49PM (#1214513)

    Have we investigated how the company or the team identifies? We may need to adjust pronouns as well.

    The company may well be plural. You should ask before you criticize. Maybe it is expressing different perception? Or the importance of its subsidiaries? Or maybe transnationalism is a factor?

    --
    ...but you HAVE heard of me.
  • (Score: 1) by pTamok on Sunday January 23 2022, @05:17PM (3 children)

    by pTamok (3042) on Sunday January 23 2022, @05:17PM (#1215034)

    The potatoes are ready to eat.
    The rice is ready to eat.

    If it is lots of things (difficult to count), in aggregate, it is singular.
    If it is a small (countable) number of things, in aggregate, it is plural.

    The horses are galloping.
    The herd is galloping.

    The IBM employees are working.
    IBM (as a singular corporate entity) is making a profit.

    Things get confused when the name of the aggregate entity is plural, as in 'The Raiders'. Then the natural sounding form is plural, as in 'the horses are galloping', the Raiders are winning. On the other hand, if you hew to the idea that the name is just a label attached to a singular entity, then the 'team called The Raiders' is winning - or in short 'The Raiders' is winning - which sounds wrong, because you tend to expect a plural form to have a plural verb.

    Back to companies: if a company is acting as a single entity, such as in a lawsuit, it can be singular, and the name is a label attached to a singular entity. If some company employees are engaged in an endeavour, then you are actually referring to a (plural) group of employees, so it is natural to use the plural form.

    Just be glad you don't speak Russian, where different plurals are used depending on how many are in the group you are referring to [russianlessons.net] (not to mention the cases). Ask a Russian which form they use for "the 1920s" - is it singular, or plural, and if plural, which plural form. It can generate heated debate amongst Russians.

    • (Score: 2) by mcgrew on Sunday January 23 2022, @09:24PM (2 children)

      by mcgrew (701) <publish@mcgrewbooks.com> on Sunday January 23 2022, @09:24PM (#1215094) Homepage Journal

      The potatoes are ready to eat.
      The rice is ready to eat.

      What if you have ten tons of potatoes? It's then "The potatoes is" or "the potato is"? I don't see quantity having anything to do with it at all. How many grains of rice are in a spoonful? If you have three grains of rice, is that three rices? The plural of rice is always rice, the plural of potato is always potatoes (or spuds).

      What about datum and data? Everybody, even on TV, says "the data is" when data is the plural of datum. That one should be "the data are".

      --
      Carbon, The only element in the known universe to ever gain sentience
      • (Score: 1) by pTamok on Sunday January 23 2022, @10:43PM

        by pTamok (3042) on Sunday January 23 2022, @10:43PM (#1215126)

        Hmm. Good point.

        There's probably a rule hiding in there somewhere. If you were cooking in industrial quantities you would say: "Are the potatoes ready?", but you would say "Is the beef ready?", or "Is the cabbage ready?". If the potatoes were mashed, it is quite possible, if not likely that you would ask "Is the potato ready?", the difference being that the potatoes have been transformed from discrete items to a continuous (uncountable) quantity of mash. I don't know enough about the technical structure of language or the descriptive vocabulary to say what is going on here. I'm sure someone who studies language for a living could sort it out.

        As for datum/data: there are still a few holdouts who say the data are, but they are rare.

      • (Score: 2) by MostCynical on Sunday January 30 2022, @08:48PM

        by MostCynical (2589) on Sunday January 30 2022, @08:48PM (#1217067) Journal

        rice is both a name and a collective noun for grains of rice

        like corn and popcorn

        you don't butter the corns (what you do with your bunions is your business)

        --
        "I guess once you start doubting, there's no end to it." -Batou, Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex
(1)