Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password


takyon (881)

Journal of takyon (881)

The Fine Print: The following are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Sunday October 24, 21
02:43 AM
Science

Can Nuclear Fusion Put the Brakes on Climate Change?

“To be honest, I was feeling pretty despondent,” Dennis Whyte, the fifty-seven-year-old director of the Plasma Science and Fusion Center, at M.I.T., said. “And I was seeing that despondency in the faces of my students, too.” It was 2013, and M.I.T.’s experimental fusion device had lost its Department of Energy funding, for no clearly stated reason. The field of nuclear fusion, as a whole, was still moving forward, but agonizingly slowly. ITER, an enormous fusion device being built in southern France, in an international collaboration, was progressing—the schedule is for iter to demonstrate net fusion energy in 2035, and the majority of plasma physicists have high confidence that it will work—but Whyte knew that it wasn’t going to deliver affordable energy to the public in his lifetime, and maybe not in his students’ lifetimes, either. “ITER is scientifically interesting. But it’s not economically interesting,” Whyte said. “I almost retired.”

Nuclear fusion researchers open another bottle.

Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Reply to Article Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Sunday October 24 2021, @03:48AM (3 children)

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Sunday October 24 2021, @03:48AM (#1190015) Homepage Journal

    Conventional nuclear power has extremely well-known disadvantages.

    That boils down to "fission". They use 9 syllables to pronounce a two syllable word. The rest of the article is much the same. It's not simply an article, it's an almost Shakespearean tale. Nothing wrong with that, of course, some people like dudes dancing in tights. I'd rather they got to the point, and saved a few paragraphs.

    --
    Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
    • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 24 2021, @08:39AM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 24 2021, @08:39AM (#1190046)

      Ignorant moron, what glows in the Arkansaws Darkness.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 27 2021, @05:06PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 27 2021, @05:06PM (#1191015)

      Lotta words just to say you're a curmudgeon. Do you do parties? We've got our own stockade and vegetables.

  • (Score: 3, Redundant) by Mojibake Tengu on Sunday October 24 2021, @09:04AM (3 children)

    by Mojibake Tengu (8598) on Sunday October 24 2021, @09:04AM (#1190048) Journal

    Fusion energy industry is advancing so fast it's always located somewhere about 30 years in future.

    Probably a best design of money sink in human history. It works perfectly as subsistence for lifetimes of several generations of scientists.
    Yes, I am pretty sure it was designed as that and it's passed to next generations of privy researchers as an occult secret, doomed to never succeed.

    --
    The edge of 太玄 cannot be defined, for it is beyond every aspect of design
    • (Score: 3, Informative) by takyon on Sunday October 24 2021, @11:25AM (1 child)

      by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Sunday October 24 2021, @11:25AM (#1190055) Journal

      I'll settle for this thing [wikipedia.org].

      --
      [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
      • (Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 24 2021, @01:14PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 24 2021, @01:14PM (#1190073)

        Seaborg: Reactance is Fissile!

    • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Monday October 25 2021, @09:06PM

      by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Monday October 25 2021, @09:06PM (#1190455) Journal

      Probably a best design of money sink in human history.

      I think you would get strong disagreement from the SLS contractors!

      --
      The anti vax hysteria didn't stop, it just died down.
  • (Score: -1, Redundant) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 24 2021, @05:01PM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 24 2021, @05:01PM (#1190123)

    NO! It always has changed. It always will change.

    Sometimes it's downright nasty. When you get right down to it, it's never been a pastoral Eden. And it never will be. Just hope you get born in the right eon.

    At least the place isn't all toxic and covered by active volcanoes, right now.

    Natural events of Biblical proportions always override good intentions.

    So, live simply, don't waste, be thankful for what you have, be nice to your neighbor, and quit cranking out so many hungry mouths.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 25 2021, @03:54PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 25 2021, @03:54PM (#1190368)

      Or you could simply continue to hobble prosperity, destroy our quality of life, squash meaningful advancement, and bankrupt yourselves... meanwhile other countries shovel coal into the atmosphere, trash into the water, and throw away the planet's precious natural resources for disposable junk.

      I guess you've made your choice. Down-mod that post even farther if you hate individual rights and responsibilities!

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 26 2021, @04:46PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 26 2021, @04:46PM (#1190688)

      It was the gun's fault.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 26 2021, @04:56PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 26 2021, @04:56PM (#1190698)

      I guess it is redundant... many people do realize — when they allow themselves some time for individual thought — that it's true, the climate has always changed, and always will. It's only when their minds are clouded by the hopes and fears from gaslighting that they forget. But it isn't redundant, because they don't think.

      Gaslight causes global warming.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 24 2021, @06:32PM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 24 2021, @06:32PM (#1190141)
    Dump enough fusion bombs and you eliminate global warming at the source. And we have the means to do it today.

    And unlike controlled fusion, there's no shortage of viable triggers: China/Taiwan, India/Pakistan, USA/Russia, …

    • (Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 24 2021, @08:52PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 24 2021, @08:52PM (#1190171)

      Fry: This snow is beautiful. I'm glad global warming never happened.
      Leela: Actually it did. But thank God nuclear winter cancelled it out.

    • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Monday October 25 2021, @09:10PM

      by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Monday October 25 2021, @09:10PM (#1190456) Journal

      No need for the fusion bombs.

      Just find a nice comfortable shade tree someplace. Camp out under it and patiently watch global warming happen all around you. It won't affect you. You can wait it out until everything returns to normal.
       

      --
      The anti vax hysteria didn't stop, it just died down.
  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 24 2021, @10:38PM (8 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 24 2021, @10:38PM (#1190203)

    Betteridge aside, let's say we get all fusion-y up in the planet's business. What happens then?

    Well, we use it, right? I mean, what else would be the point?

    OK, so now we put it through all sorts of things. Lights. Transformers. Wires. Motors. Batteries.

    You know what all these things do? They end up putting out heat. Motion ends up dissipating in heat, whether it's rubber on asphalt or transmission losses in a powerline. Sure, it doesn't release carbon into the atmosphere but that mostly relates to the effects of insolation. If we generate lots of heat down here, the fact that it isn't trapped at the same rate from the sky doesn't help us a whole lot. Then of course, if we're doing things with the energy that end up releasing carbon in other ways (such as increasing the rate of the carbon cycle owing to agricultural activities) then it's all moot anyway.

    Let's put this in different terms: quite aside from carbon, a high-energy economy heats up the biosphere, because of entropy.

    • (Score: 2) by takyon on Sunday October 24 2021, @11:03PM (7 children)

      by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Sunday October 24 2021, @11:03PM (#1190208) Journal

      Just launch mirrors into space or do stratospheric aerosol injection to compensate.

      --
      [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 25 2021, @01:46AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 25 2021, @01:46AM (#1190245)

        Those work irrespective of how much fusion is happening on earth.

        In fact, they work better (relatively speaking) the more carbon's in the atmosphere.

      • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Monday October 25 2021, @02:31AM (5 children)

        by fustakrakich (6150) on Monday October 25 2021, @02:31AM (#1190251) Journal

        :-) You need to "do the math" [ucsd.edu]

        At that 2.3% growth rate, we would be using energy at a rate corresponding to the total solar input striking Earth in a little over 400 years. We would consume something comparable to the entire sun in 1400 years from now. By 2500 years, we would use energy at the rate of the entire Milky Way galaxy—100 billion stars! I think you can see the absurdity of continued energy growth. 2500 years is not that long, from a historical perspective. We know what we were doing 2500 years ago. I think I know what we’re not going to be doing 2500 years hence...

        And you can see the thermodynamic point in this scenario as well. If we tried to generate energy at a rate commensurate with that of the Sun in 1400 years, and did this on Earth, physics demands that the surface of the Earth must be hotter than the (much larger) surface of the Sun. Just like 100 W from a light bulb results in a much hotter surface than the same 100 W you and I generate via metabolism, spread out across a much larger surface area.

        --
        La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
        • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday October 25 2021, @03:51AM (4 children)

          by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday October 25 2021, @03:51AM (#1190262) Journal
          Now we just need to find someone who actually argued that an infinite stretch of exponential growth in energy consumption is practical and desirable.
          • (Score: 2, Funny) by nostyle on Monday October 25 2021, @03:32PM (3 children)

            by nostyle (11497) on Monday October 25 2021, @03:32PM (#1190355) Journal

            ...find someone who actually argued that an infinite stretch of exponential growth in energy consumption is practical and desirable.

            You mean... like every stock-holder ever.

  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by khallow on Sunday October 31 2021, @01:05AM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Sunday October 31 2021, @01:05AM (#1192073) Journal
    I think this shows how ITER is an utter waste of resources. Any useful fusion reactor will use high temperature superconductors (HTS) not extraordinarily expensive, liquid helium-cooled superconductors. Just look at how transformational this researcher Whyte thought HTS was.

    I get that planning on ITER was started during a time when HTS wasn't viable. Well, technology changed, but the project didn't. This is classic fusion research in a nutshell - doing projects nobody needs and investigating technologies so expensive nobody will use them commercially.

    I think this demonstrates a pathology of publicly funded research, namely, that it's both primarily status signaling and second, that there are no alternatives when it's done this way. Projects like ITER aren't merely dead ends. They also take resources away from projects that would work.
(1)