A convicted software pirate has been handed an unusual punishment. The man, named only as Jakub F, will be spared having to pay hefty damages - as long as a film denouncing piracy he was made to produce gets 200,000 views.He came to the out-of-court settlement with a host of firms whose software he pirated after being convicted by a Czech court. In return, they agreed not to sue him. The 30-year-old was also given a three-year suspended sentence.
The criminal court decided that any financial penalty would have to be decided either in civil proceedings or out of court. The firms, which included Microsoft, HBO Europe, Sony Music and Twentieth Century Fox, estimated that the financial damage amounted to 5.7m Czech Crowns (£148,000). But the Business Software Alliance (BSA), which represented Microsoft, acknowledged that Jakub could not pay that sum.
Instead, the companies said they would be happy to receive only a small payment and his co-operation in the production of the video. In order for the firms' promise not to sue to be valid, they said, the video would have to be viewed at least 200,000 times within two months of its publication this week. A spokesman for the BSA told the BBC that the stipulation was to ensure that Jakub would help share it as widely as possible. But, if the video did not reach the target, the spokesman said that - "in theory" - the firms would have grounds to bring a civil case for damages.
The YouTube film, currently at over 450k views means Jakub should avoid any further legal action.
[Editor's note: SiKing also submitted this, but not quite in time to get it merged with the other already in the queue.]
(Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 27 2015, @09:00PM
He could have at least made the video entertaining by dressing up as Captain Jack Sparrow or similar and show him surrendering his cutlass to authorities.
(Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Friday November 27 2015, @09:15PM
Yeah, lame video. And the actors speak in some strange dialect that I coudln'te even understand.
(Score: 4, Insightful) by aristarchus on Friday November 27 2015, @09:30PM
Warning! This video is copyrighted! by default! Even though it is on YouTube, you are making a copy in your computer's Random Access Memory (if only sequentially), and no doubt this is all part of the plan! When almost all of the imaginary property companies want to to download something from the 'net, you should listen to Adm. Ackbar: "It's a trap!"
(Score: 2) by melikamp on Friday November 27 2015, @09:46PM
(Score: 2) by bzipitidoo on Friday November 27 2015, @10:45PM
The War on Piracy has been a farce for years now. The intellectual property extremists lost a long time ago. I think they know it too, but am not sure-- they could be that stupid. These days, they're really only making loot runs into a burning house. For so long as there are politicians and judges who bought their propaganda or bribes (or both), they can keep guerrilla fighting. They have traction with those groups because they tend to be of older generations. Most younger people laugh at them now. Give it another generation or two, and hopefully they won't be able to hurt anyone any more and have to quit.
(Score: 2) by Anal Pumpernickel on Saturday November 28 2015, @01:08AM
Except that a lot of people in the younger generations seem to be copyright maximalists. Maybe the thought of the possibility that there won't be as many DRM-encumbered proprietary software games (Talk about stockholm syndrome...) has them fearful. Even the ones who don't support draconian copyright laws tend to repeat industry propaganda ("intellectual property", "piracy", etc.), which doesn't help.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 28 2015, @08:37PM
There is a difference between being "copyright maximalist" and being in favor of some copy protection laws while being opposed to our currently corporate bought laws. I do find that most people tend to support IP laws to some degree and I don't necessarily oppose them altogether but it's our currently corporate bought system that I oppose.
(Score: 2) by Anal Pumpernickel on Saturday November 28 2015, @09:16PM
See, this is what [gnu.org] I mean [gnu.org]: People willingly repeat the propaganda of the corporations, even if they do not agree with many of the things corporations do. I don't see why people need to help multi-billion dollar companies spread propaganda; they have more than enough power to do that on their own.
As for there being a difference between copyright maximalism and supporting the existence of some form of copyright, I know that. However, the fact remains that there seems to be quite a lot of copyright maximalists, even among younger generations. You can usually tell because these sorts of people tend to use all sorts of propagandist terminology to describe copyright infringement and even organizations like the EFF which fight companies that violate people's rights using copyright laws ("theft", "stealing", "freetards", etc.). None of it makes sense in that context and is often just a straw man used to dismiss people who are concerned about liberty.
(Score: 3, Insightful) by NotSanguine on Friday November 27 2015, @09:56PM
Confess your transgressions, citizen! [youtube.com]
No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
(Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 28 2015, @01:13AM
but the question is how many people watched the video all the way through vs how many people watched 10 seconds of it and it incremented the counter. The video isn't even in English so who would really watch it all the way through or 'benefit' from it. As people in the video comments point out this video doesn't seem to be encouraging anyone not to pirate anything and it doesn't seem to have 'humiliated' anyone being that those that 'watched' it are mostly those that just felt sorry for someone that fell victim to a broken governmental system and watched it to give him the views necessary to get off the hook. The only ones humiliated here were those handing out this punishment. As those in the video comments pointed out this sure did backfire and this should have obviously been expected to have backfired.
(Score: 2) by takyon on Saturday November 28 2015, @01:31AM
YouTube analytics tells you the average number of seconds viewers watched a particular video for. This is often far less than the duration of the video. You could just multiply the average number of seconds watched by the number of views to get the "true" number of views.
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 28 2015, @02:06AM
Does youtube analytics count downloads with something like youtube-dl as a full watch?
If so, I'll download it 50 times to help the guy out.
(Score: 2) by takyon on Saturday November 28 2015, @02:23AM
I doubt it. My guess is that YouTube keeps those stats internally and doesn't share them. It's a wonder they haven't taken more steps to break YouTube downloader extensions.
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/1714329 [google.com]
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2991785 [google.com]
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 28 2015, @02:42AM
They constantly make changes that break youtube-dl -- but it is so well supported that work-arounds are released within hours.
(Score: 2) by frojack on Saturday November 28 2015, @05:49AM
YouTube analytics tells you the average number of seconds viewers watched a particular video for.
What does it measure when you know a video exists, and still can't be bothered to launch it?
No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
(Score: 2) by takyon on Saturday November 28 2015, @06:04AM
Nothing. Or maybe 1-2 seconds if you accidentally open a video and close it.
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 1) by rigrig on Saturday November 28 2015, @03:22AM
200k people viewing it amounts to what, $10billion he would've made by selling it?
No one remembers the singer.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 28 2015, @05:55PM
Next time you're going to tell me that this child actually needs 1000 share & likes to receive his heart transplant ?