Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Wednesday November 09 2016, @10:26AM   Printer-friendly
from the perfect-harmony dept.

Nearly four centuries ago Isaac Newton demonstrated that a glass prism could separate white light into all the colors of a rainbow. Now a Switzerland-based team of electrical engineers has built a device that can do something similar for sound—splitting noise into its constituent frequencies by physical means only.

The so-called acoustic prism comprises a 40-centimeter-long hollow aluminum case with a series of 10 holes on its side. Within, flexible polymer membranes divide the case into chambers. These barriers vibrate and transmit sound to neighboring cavities with a delay that depends on a sound wave's frequency. When the delayed waves escape from the holes, they are refracted in different directions so that waves with the lowest frequencies (comparable to red light) can be heard at the end nearest to the source, whereas higher frequencies (comparable to blue light) are refracted farther down the device. "This mimics how a water droplet or glass prism refracts each color of light at different angles," says Hussein Esfahlani, who studies signal processing at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne. The device's design was recently published in the Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.


Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by RamiK on Wednesday November 09 2016, @11:23AM

    by RamiK (1813) on Wednesday November 09 2016, @11:23AM (#424527)
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 09 2016, @04:57PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 09 2016, @04:57PM (#424736)

      Yup, duplicate. I remember making the last comment there.

  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 09 2016, @11:25AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 09 2016, @11:25AM (#424528)

    > Nearly four centuries ago Isaac Newton demonstrated that a glass prism could separate white light into all the colors of a rainbow.

    NO! This was well known in Newton's time.

    Newton demonstrated that the colors from a prism follow straight lines. Descartes had proposed that light colour was generated by spinning balls, which would follow a curved trajectory. Newton followed the idea that light colour was generated by wave frequency, and waves follow a straight trajectory. So Newton was able to reject Descartes's hypothesis.

    The important point is that Newton used an experiment to reject a hypothesis proposed by a philosopher. It is one of the very early examples of such empirical reasoning. Newton's study also led to his invention of the reflecting telescope.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 09 2016, @11:46AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 09 2016, @11:46AM (#424541)

      FOOL! We don't need empirical reasoning! This is Trumpland!

    • (Score: 2, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 09 2016, @12:20PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 09 2016, @12:20PM (#424558)

      Newton followed the idea that light colour was generated by wave frequency,

      No, he didn't. He had a corpuscular theory of light. [wikipedia.org]

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 09 2016, @04:56PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 09 2016, @04:56PM (#424734)

        > No, he didn't. He had a corpuscular theory of light.

        My mistake. Note that he did propose a sort of weird wave-particle duality in later editions of Opticks. Probably why I got confused. The point though is that they are not spinning balls and light travels in straight lines.

  • (Score: -1, Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 09 2016, @11:29AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 09 2016, @11:29AM (#424534)
    • (Score: 2) by takyon on Wednesday November 09 2016, @02:32PM

      by takyon (881) <reversethis-{gro ... s} {ta} {noykat}> on Wednesday November 09 2016, @02:32PM (#424623) Journal

      Tell that to Arizona.

      --
      [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 09 2016, @03:24PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 09 2016, @03:24PM (#424667)

        ain't shit compared to the now legal rec. states, i'm sure they'll try again though.

  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 09 2016, @12:14PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 09 2016, @12:14PM (#424554)

    Now a Switzerland-based team of electrical engineers has built a device that can do something similar for sound—splitting noise into its constituent frequencies by physical means only.

    Such a device already exists. It is known as ear. The frequency splitting is purely physical, only afterwards it gets converted to nerve pulses.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 09 2016, @12:25PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 09 2016, @12:25PM (#424559)

      What they describe sounds like you're blowing in the back end of a flute.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 09 2016, @03:57PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 09 2016, @03:57PM (#424698)

        Gross.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 10 2016, @08:27PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 10 2016, @08:27PM (#425284)

      The ear doesn't split soundwaves up. It has hairs that are tuned to be responsive to different frequencies, an ear won't take a single sound source and send it in different directions based on the component frequencies. In other words, an ear is nothing like this device.