Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Friday November 18 2016, @11:34PM   Printer-friendly
from the I-feel-safer-already dept.

Submitted via IRC for TheMightyBuzzard

Despite loudly, and repeatedly, raised concerns from activists and members of Parliament, the UK's Snooper's Charter (a.k.a., Investigatory Powers bill [PDF]) has been passed by both parliamentary houses and only needs the formality of the royal signature to make it official.

[...] The government, of course, is trying to portray this as nothing more than a fine tuning of pre-existing laws, specifically the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA). Glossed over in its perfunctory "nothing to see here" explanation is the fact that RIPA was also rushed into existence to codify other secret and illegal surveillance programs.

But it's no ordinary update of existing investigatory laws. Jim Killock of the Open Rights Group calls the Snooper's Charter "the most extreme surveillance law ever passed in a democracy." Thanks to the new powers, UK intelligence agencies should be able to put together very extensive dossiers on pretty much anyone they feel like.

Quick, Deucalion, run!

Source: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20161117/07202536067/parliament-passes-snoopers-charter-opens-up-citizens-to-whole-new-levels-domestic-surviellance.shtml


Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 18 2016, @11:53PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 18 2016, @11:53PM (#429187)

    The gummit will know the names of all of my socks when I talk to myself online?

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 18 2016, @11:54PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 18 2016, @11:54PM (#429188)

      Your secret identity isn't secret anymore, Stupidman!

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 18 2016, @11:56PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 18 2016, @11:56PM (#429189)

        Well this will make cybering with myself a little bit awkward.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 18 2016, @11:57PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 18 2016, @11:57PM (#429190)

          Better practice beating off in front of a mirror.

          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 19 2016, @01:37AM

            by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 19 2016, @01:37AM (#429225)

            Better practice beating off in front of a mirror.

            Why a mirror? I can just FaceTime myself with my phone and my laptop.

          • (Score: 2) by fritsd on Saturday November 19 2016, @12:46PM

            by fritsd (4586) on Saturday November 19 2016, @12:46PM (#429376) Journal

            But then Theresa May can't see you!

  • (Score: 2) by Nerdfest on Friday November 18 2016, @11:58PM

    by Nerdfest (80) on Friday November 18 2016, @11:58PM (#429191)

    should be able to put together very extensive dossiers on pretty much anyone they feel like

    Meaning of course, everyone they can.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 19 2016, @12:07AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 19 2016, @12:07AM (#429198)

    For that comfortable illusion of privacy, use a VPN.

    • (Score: 2) by Nerdfest on Saturday November 19 2016, @12:09AM

      by Nerdfest (80) on Saturday November 19 2016, @12:09AM (#429200)

      In a different country.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 19 2016, @12:19AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 19 2016, @12:19AM (#429202)

        Sure just give MI6 an excuse to get involved, and that's assuming your endpoint in the People's Republic of Ruritania isn't already compromised.

        • (Score: 2) by RamiK on Saturday November 19 2016, @12:39AM

          by RamiK (1813) on Saturday November 19 2016, @12:39AM (#429212)

          Read the bill. They don't need an excuse.

          --
          compiling...
          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 19 2016, @01:00AM

            by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 19 2016, @01:00AM (#429217)

            So you should use a VPN because ... ?

            Oooooo I know! You should use Tor! because Tor is trustiness.

            • (Score: 3, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 19 2016, @01:42AM

              by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 19 2016, @01:42AM (#429226)

              I use Tor ... behind seven proxies! Seven! And each one is connected via a separate VPN! Sure, there's some latency but ... hold on, some news is coming across the wire ... Lincoln's been shot!?!?

            • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 19 2016, @01:59AM

              by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 19 2016, @01:59AM (#429231)

              > So you should use a VPN because ... ?

              Because you will be unique.
              When collection is the standard, then it is easy to trawl through everybody's data.
              If you use a VPN then if they do manage collect your data, its not going into the same bucket as everybody else - its going into the bucket of people who are probably terrorists. That means you will be outside of routine privacy violations. You will only be subject to special-case violations. Either way you are at risk, but at least you avoid you will avoid most of the risks.

              Think of it this way - if you are a pirate and they decide to go after pirates, they are going to look at the data collected from regular people because that's the low hanging fruit. Maybe they will also look at the extra suspicious people too, in which case you are no worse off than the normals. But if they decide to skip that group because its a different database and its pretty small so its not worth their effort, then you come out a winner.

              • (Score: 3, Insightful) by vux984 on Saturday November 19 2016, @03:24AM

                by vux984 (5045) on Saturday November 19 2016, @03:24AM (#429252)

                If you use a VPN then if they do manage collect your data, its not going into the same bucket as everybody else - its going into the bucket of people who are probably terrorists. That means you will be outside of routine privacy violations.

                This is why more normal people need to do it, to make that bucket as big as possible. So that the journalists, activists, whistleblowers, etc have some cover. (And yeah i guess the terrorists and perverts too... but I'd rather we catch terrorists and perverts by other means than mass surveillance so I can live with that.

                • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 19 2016, @06:41AM

                  by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 19 2016, @06:41AM (#429318)

                  Sorry, I do not follow your logic.
                  If there are two buckets - one for normals and one for extra-suspicious people, what is the benefit of increasing the size of the later bucket?

                  Do you think that an automated search is deterred by the size of the bucket? I sure don't think so.
                  The only thing that deters the search of a bucket is the hassle of getting access to that bucket.
                  The drag-net searches are always going to be in the biggest bucket because there are just more low hanging fruit in that bucket.

                  Targeted searches may or may not be applied to both buckets. But if they are directly going after you, it won't matter how many other people are in the same bucket as you because computers are really good at searching databases.

                  • (Score: 2) by vux984 on Sunday November 20 2016, @09:26PM

                    by vux984 (5045) on Sunday November 20 2016, @09:26PM (#430100)

                    Do you think that an automated search is deterred by the size of the bucket? I sure don't think so.

                    False positves = Yes. The more regular people in the bucket, the more regular people will be caught in the net, the less the net is useful.

              • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 19 2016, @03:02PM

                by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 19 2016, @03:02PM (#429412)

                If you use a VPN then if they do manage collect your data, its not going into the same bucket as everybody else - its going into the bucket of people who are probably terrorists.

                Yes, I can confirm, most employees that are away from their office are terrorists.

  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by mhajicek on Saturday November 19 2016, @06:50AM

    by mhajicek (51) on Saturday November 19 2016, @06:50AM (#429320)

    Protests are pretty meaningless when you as a people have been disarmed. The government has no reason to fear you, so no reason to listen to you. You are powerless serfs, and will continue to be subjugated.

    --
    The spacelike surfaces of time foliations can have a cusp at the surface of discontinuity. - P. Hajicek
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 19 2016, @07:32AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 19 2016, @07:32AM (#429332)

      2 + 2 = ... 4? I knew it, BUY MOAR GUNS!

    • (Score: 1, Troll) by ledow on Saturday November 19 2016, @12:18PM

      by ledow (5567) on Saturday November 19 2016, @12:18PM (#429368) Homepage

      We haven't been disarmed.

      We were never, in fact, armed.

      There's a big difference.

      And as someone who's grown up in that environment, I'm unbelievably happier with my lot than, say, living in a country where every idiot carries a gun, and every cop pulls one for every minor thing.

      Honestly, you need to go read some books, social experiments, and statistics.

      I watched "The 100" for the first time the other week (it's on Amazon Prime). Apart from the fact that I'd written an almost identical story back in my teens that matches with the first episode virtually perfectly, the next thing that really annoyed me? Within minutes of arriving, they are crafting weapons. Within days there are multiple murders. Within a handful of episodes they have guns. Every episode someone dies or is beaten to a pulp or tortured. Despite the undercurrent of "Let's do this peacefully", all the main characters eventually collude in order to kill or torture people. It's like a Milgram experiment on the screen. 7 episodes in, 14 people were dead.

      I honestly love the "survival" scenario kind of programs, documentary or fiction. I'm usually yelling at the documentary ones - where people try to survive as if it were 10,000 BC, or on an island with limited resources, etc. - because they're almost always a bunch of idiots who run out of food through gorging themselves and end up all shagging each other.

      And I watched "The 100" and did what I always do - shout at them to do the sensible things throughout. My very first thought was "I'd get away from the entire fucking lot of them". The greatest danger in the first few episodes is those exact people who think that crafting a bunch of weapons against - at that point - no threat but themselves - as their first idea. Almost before food, shelter, exploration.

      To you that probably reinforces your "You should have a gun, then" attitude. To me, it just confirms the Milgram experiment - that everyone is capable of atrocities. And giving them weapons gives them the power to commit them so easily they are barely a thought, even in an entertainment format, and prevents discussion, even argument, for fear of death.

      My first outburst towards the screen while watching it - maybe even in Episode 1, I can't remember - was "Get the fuck away from these people and go it alone, you silly bitch". And I'm so unhappy that NOBODY does that. In fact, by Episode 8 the entire purpose given from the first day on the ground (get to a shelter that was a long way away) has been totally forgotten, and it turns into Animal Farm, with the group killing each other, others (even in peace negotiations), and themselves.

      I literally stopped watching it as it descended from there. It was depressing when even the main peaceful characters just order people to perform torture as if it's no big deal - certainly less tears than their boyfriend shagging another woman, for example.

      Keep your guns, and your dystopia, and keep them far away from me. I won't live in a dystopia where it's necessary for me to arm myself beyond literal self-defence. I.e. for a limited time, against an obvious and direct and immediate threat. I honestly think I'd rather die. But the UK isn't like that, even if Theresa May has finally got the snooper bill she's been pushing for nearly a decade.

      • (Score: 2) by fritsd on Saturday November 19 2016, @12:43PM

        by fritsd (4586) on Saturday November 19 2016, @12:43PM (#429373) Journal

        No, the UK isn't like that, the UK has Taransay [wikipedia.org] :-) (The BBC, in any case). One of the most interesting things I've ever seen on TV.

        There was violence on Taransay as well, a few people got into fights. I don't recall that they dismembered each other with their butcher's knives, though.
        But it was a fascinating program to watch on TV. In fact the only reality-TV program I have ever watched.

        Could there be tribes that would have made it a priority to build a cannon to repel invaders that surely would try to attack their peaceful island?
        I'm not even thinking about Americans here; but about e.g. people from the Andaman islands [wikipedia.org].
        Must be a cultural thing.

      • (Score: 2) by Squidious on Saturday November 19 2016, @03:45PM

        by Squidious (4327) on Saturday November 19 2016, @03:45PM (#429422)

        This is just one anecdote, but when my family went to the UK in the late 70's we stayed entirely at Bed and Breakfasts around the countryside. One morning we were woken up by the sound of a machine gun going rat-tat-tat. The elderly lady we were staying with had a freaking Bren gun mounted on a tripod in her back yard. Her late husband had put it there for her to take care of the rabbits getting into her garden. Having taken care of business, she covered it back up with a tarp and proceeded to made us breakfast.

        --
        The terrorists have won, game, set, match. They've scared the people into electing authoritarian regimes.
        • (Score: 2) by ledow on Saturday November 19 2016, @05:31PM

          by ledow (5567) on Saturday November 19 2016, @05:31PM (#429481) Homepage

          Likely it would have been completely illegal even then.

          https://www.gov.uk/shotgun-and-firearm-certificates [www.gov.uk]

          That's a "go directly to jail, do not pass go" kind of firearm.

          But, yes, some farmers have shotguns and some licensed people have small arms.

          I've literally never held, fired, or known any person who owns a gun. I've seen them only on police at airports. Not even normal police.

          • (Score: 2) by Squidious on Saturday November 19 2016, @10:31PM

            by Squidious (4327) on Saturday November 19 2016, @10:31PM (#429655)

            Possibly her late husband was a high ranking officer in WW2, and thus got a free pass with the local constabulary? It was one of the experiences from our trip that left the biggest impression upon a very young me.

            --
            The terrorists have won, game, set, match. They've scared the people into electing authoritarian regimes.
      • (Score: 1, Troll) by mhajicek on Saturday November 19 2016, @04:37PM

        by mhajicek (51) on Saturday November 19 2016, @04:37PM (#429443)

        Maybe you should learn to distinguish real life from fiction. Most tv shows have people regularly getting over emotional and doing stupid things in order to create conflict. Peace makes for bad tv.

        --
        The spacelike surfaces of time foliations can have a cusp at the surface of discontinuity. - P. Hajicek
  • (Score: 2) by jcross on Saturday November 19 2016, @07:02PM

    by jcross (4009) on Saturday November 19 2016, @07:02PM (#429545)

    Sounds like a giant boon for VPN services! Yep, here's the user's complete web history: one encrypted connection to Belarus or wherever. If ISPs refuse to be dumb pipes, or are legally required not to be, they'll just be made into dumb pipes anyway.