SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Submitted via IRC for AndyTheAbsurd
Mentioned previously on SN, Amazon has started direct-to-car deliveries:
Amazon is expanding its in-home delivery service called Key to include deliveries to trunks and back seats of cars. The service is available only to Amazon Prime members in 37 cities who have a 2015 or newer Chevrolet, Buick, GMC, Cadillac or Volvo with an active OnStar or Volvo On Call account.
Essentially, these are already connected cars that can be remotely unlocked — in this case for package delivery, which Amazon promises within a four-hour window. The shopper has to confirm that they've parked within range of the delivery location — in a publicly accessible area — and can track the progress through the Amazon Key app.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Amazon Wants to Deliver Packages Inside Your Car
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 30 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Grelb's Reminder:
Eighty percent of all people consider themselves to be above
average drivers.
(Score: 2) by SomeGuy on Thursday April 26 2018, @04:14PM (1 child)
To me, this is a problem begging for a REAL solution, such large dedicated secure delivery boxes built directly in to houses and apartments.
Look back in time a few decades, and it was not really all that common for someone to have large items shipped to them. People would instead drive a few hours to a somewhat specialized big store and buy things. Stores actually carried common things people needed. Typically only highly specialized stuff would need to be shipped across the country.
But today almost EVERYTHING has to be shipped. (After all, it is all coming from china anyway). And somehow people feel obligated to use the internet and toy smartphones to buy things rather than going to a brick and mortar store. On the flip side, many brick and mortar stores have closed up to "reduce costs" and ship common items from only one location wherever property happens to be cheaper.
Uppity folks today even feel the need to have ultra-common items delivered rather than driving down to Walmart.
Anyway, the point is there needs to be a proper solution to this. Letting people in to your trunk is a bad idea. But right now that is all some people have. A better solution would involve something integrated in to the design of a house or apartment. Those can not be added easily or quickly, but long term should be focused on rather than cockamamie workarounds.
On the other hand, with how nuts shipping costs have gotten recently, it would make more sense to bring back some of the larger brick and mortar specialty stores.
(Score: 3, Insightful) by urza9814 on Thursday April 26 2018, @11:46PM
There are *many* proper solutions to this problem.
First of all, the concept of having unlocked mailboxes in an apartment complex is just absurd to begin with IMO. We've got locked boxes at mine -- the mail carrier has one key, which unlocks an entire row of boxes at a time then we each have our own key to our individual box. Basically, when the mail carrier uses their key, the entire row folds out from the top and he can load mail in the top, but when we use our keys the door to that one box opens to the side. No problem.
But of course that's just mail. For packages...they go to the leasing office or they get held at the post office or delivery service. Mostly they'll take everything directly to the leasing office and I can pick it up there, but since their hours kinda suck I often request to pick them up at the nearest depot or store of the delivery company. USPS, UPS, FedEx, they all let you do that.
The other option is drop boxes, which I've used a few times as well, mostly because they're "open" 24/7. The local grocery store a couple blocks away has one for UPS, and I can go into the app any time from when I place my order up to the moment it gets delivered and have them divert it (for free) to the drop box. Or to a nearby UPS store. Or to the UPS depot. Or to my leasing office, or my front porch, or my neighbor's place...there's no shortage of options.
This is just Amazon's way to make up for a lack of physical presence. UPS can get me a package at the depot, or at the store, or at the drop box, or sometimes they even stick it on another truck and try again later. Amazon doesn't have stores, they don't have many drop box locations, they don't have a ton of trucks driving all over town that can just try again later. So they expect their customers to provide their own infrastructure instead, along with all of the costs and risks associated with that. Amazon doesn't want to pay UPS[/FedEx/USPS/etc], nor do they want to pay the costs of replacing UPS, so they figure they can boost their profits by forcing their customers to pay for it in a way that disguises the cost -- ie, the $30/month that it costs for OnStar would pay for a heck of a lot of UPS shipping, but Amazon gets to claim that shipping is actually cheaper because they don't consider that $30/month.