SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Here is a submission as a result from a conversation I had with mrcoolbp over email.
I want to present the following idea for a regularly-occurring SoylentNews story: a weekly promotion of an open source software project.
The current vision is to have a weekly post on the main page with an open source project presented (I suggest Sunday afternoon EST time, helping fill the slow news day). After a short description of the project and the normal collection of relevant links (homepage, downloads, etc.), the submitter presents the project to the SoylentNews community. This takes the form of an extended post (similar to the SoylentNews meta posts that often have a short blurb for main page and "Read more past the break").
Keep reading 'past the break' for more:
While we already see a number of open source related articles, typically they are associated with larger projects and with an "event". One of the ideas behind this proposal is to feature less popular projects during business as usual. I would encourage promoting projects which you have personal experience with, i.e. you develop for the project or are an avid user.In an effort to provide some independent journalism, the content 'past the break' is loosely defined. This could be a review or description of the software, an interview with the dev team, a story about how the software saved your life, poem, and so on. While I currently have these high and mighty dreams for the feature, I also want to encourage those who aren't as inspired by writing to post; SoylentNews is driven by our submissions, and I would rather read a short blurb than have no post.
When a post is selected, the highlighted project should be made aware, not only because it would be polite (and indirectly promote SoylentNews), but if the article goes live at a convenient time, perhaps the dev team might take part in the comment discussion.
What it will take to implement this idea:
- An "OSS Plug" topic (https://soylentnews.org/topics.pl). It could fall under other categories but it will be much easier to parse submissions with a dedicated topic.
- A decision on the permission required from the parent project. Many "contact us" emails are ignored, so would it be acceptable to make a post without warning the project?
- Submissions. Similar to regular articles, this could go dry if people don't participate.
- A selection process. If the SN team wants to own this or if a different solution is needed (I'm not familiar with what happens now).
A quick example (short as I don't use the software directly myself):
Weekly OSS: Slashcode!
Slashcode is an OSS project used to run news websites, in particular SoylentNews. From the developer's page:
Slash -- Slashdot Like Automated Storytelling Homepage -- is the code that runs Slashdot. More than that, however, Slash is an architecture for putting together web sites. It comes with functionality for posting articles, conducting polls, having discussions, and more; but it can be extended in innumerable ways.
Slash is written in Perl, and is built on top of Apache and mod_perl. It requires a database backend, though the only well-supported database used with it is MySQL (more databases will become well-supported as time goes on; PostgreSQL support is already well on its way). Slash is fast, scalable, and secure (as evidenced by one of the best test cases you could have, running Slashdot itself). Slash was originally written by CmdrTaco and CowboyNeal.
Through a plugin system, developers can add functionality to Slash. Through themes and templates (which are written using Template Toolkit), the look and feel of a Slash site can be customized.
Read more past the break:
For some reason I cannot put my finger on the first time I saw a website running Slashcode. It must have been ten years ago, but that is a big blur in my memory. I do remember the introduction of SoylentNews, the forefront news website running Slashcode.
Slashcode has a sophisticated commenting system for stories posted. What makes it so innovative is the rating system for each comment. This helps off topic comments get weeded out, and for the more insightful comments to be highlighted. This does depend on the community to prevent abuse, however I have seen very few cases of the commenting system fail.
Some improvements have been made to Slashcode in recent history, and the usability has evolved with the development of SoylentNews. I particularly like how gracefully the site fails thanks to the lack of javascript dependencies and the resulting clean interface.
There are also a number of features present that I have yet to use, and I am unsure how well they will integrate into the news website format. Particularly the Journals. Each user may make posts to their own user Journal. Beyond the site admins I see little need for this feature for regular users, and there are many other social media websites that provide similar functions. However, if this is the extent of feature creep I am satisfied with this project.
(Score: 2) by Marand on Tuesday May 05 2015, @02:51AM
it has to do with MS shills and sycophants who spend all their time bashing FOSS (regardless of what platform it runs on).
Why is this a problem? Simple: who wants to try to have a rational discussion in the presence of an overwhelming number of nasty, bashing messages? It becomes so tiresome that all the quality contributors simply leave
So, what, we're not supposed to discuss anything because somebody might start trolling? Don't feed the damn trolls, that's been internet rule #1 for a long time. Downmod the people. If it's the same people, set them to enemy and give enemies -6 so they're permanently in mod-hell for you.
For what it's worth, the only hardcore MS sycophant here seems to be Hairyfeet, at least that I've noticed. Though I wouldn't be surprised if a few anti-MS extremists here would count me as one -- despite not even using Windows -- because I'm more "meh, don't care" than "omg screw you" about MS these days. There is a fair share of AC trolling, but it seems to just be the same few people trolling for the hell of it, like the "systemd troll" and MikeeUSA.
If anything, the general tone here is heavily slanted toward Linux/BSDs and FOSS, rather than against. I've noticed that even saying something neutral about MS tends to attract downmods, and the responses to this summary have been overwhelmingly positive. I'm not sure where you're getting the impression you've got, but it seems way off base in my experience.
It isn't much better. It's mostly the same crowd.
I have to disagree. I still check Slashdot articles and the general discussion here, especially on topic overlap, is far more civil and generally more tolerant of dissenting opinion, at least on tech topics. The politics stories are a minefield, but they always are.
The big exception is MikeeUSA hovering around the edges, posting AC. He's doing it on Slashdot too -- I've seen the same posts show up in both places -- but gets drowned out by the volume of people there, whereas here he gets noticed more. He might be why you think there's a large "MS shill" problem here, actually, because he's got a personal vendetta against Debian and "contributes" to discussions by trashing it (and systemd, lately) any chance he gets.
Not wanting to see countless posts making fun of FOSS users and bashing FOSS as "amateur" is not what I consider an "echo chamber".
Suggesting talk of FOSS be restricted to FOSS-only sites and "appropriate" reddit forums because you "don't see a lot of FOSS haters" there is suggesting that discussion only be conducted in an echo chamber.