Join our Folding@Home team:
Main F@H site
Our team page
Support us: Subscribe Here
and buy SoylentNews Swag
We always have a place for talented people, visit the Get Involved section on the wiki to see how you can make SoylentNews better.
A case of astronomical fratricide is doomed to end in a fiery supernova bright enough to be spotted from Earth during the day.
A study published this August in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society investigated a binary star system about 10,000 light-years from Earth called V Sagittae. Researchers finally solved the century-long mystery behind what makes it so freaking bright. They found that the system is strangely luminous because one of the pair, a super-dense white dwarf, is absolutely scarfing down on its larger sibling at unprecedented speed.
Eventually, the two stars will collide, producing a supernova explosion of unusual brightness. The event is set to occur "in the coming years," the researchers said in a university statement.
"V Sagittae is no ordinary star system—it's the brightest of its kind and has baffled experts since it was first discovered in 1902. Our study shows that this extreme brightness is down to the white dwarf sucking the life out of its companion star, using the accreted matter to turn it into a blazing inferno," Phil Charles, a co-author of the study and a researcher at the University of Southampton, said in the statement. "It's a process so intense that it's going thermonuclear on the white dwarf's surface, shining like a beacon in the night sky."
The team observed the extraterrestrial siblings, which orbit each other once every 12.3 hours, using the powerful European Southern Observatory's Very Large Telescope in Chile. By doing so they also found a giant ring of gas around the binary stars, consisting of the debris from carnage and resulting from the gargantuan levels of energy the white dwarf is generating.
This unexpected finding provides insight that could reshape our knowledge about the birth and death of stars, explained Pasi Hakala, a researcher at the University of Turku and co-lead author of the study. "The white dwarf cannot consume all the mass being transferred from its hot star twin, so it creates this bright cosmic ring," he continued. "The speed at which this doomed stellar system is lurching wildly, likely due to the extreme brightness, is a frantic sign of its imminent, violent end."
Pablo Rodríguez-Gil, the other co-lead author and a researcher at the Spanish Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias and University of La Laguna, says that in the near future, the amassing matter on the white dwarf will probably create a nova outburst. A nova is an explosion in a binary star system, and this one would make V Sagittae visible to people on Earth without the help of any instruments.
"But when the two stars finally smash into each other and explode, this would be a supernova explosion so bright it'll be visible from Earth even in the daytime," he concluded.
Journal Reference: Pasi Hakala, Phil Charles, Pablo Rodríguez-Gil, V Sge: supersoft source or exotic hot binary? – I. An X-Shooter campaign in the high state, MNRAS, Volume 543, Issue 3, November 2025, Pages 2058–2077, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf1284
https://www.osnews.com/story/144027/mozillas-new-ceo-firefox-will-become-an-ai-browser/
In recent years, things have not been going well for Mozilla. Firefox's market share is a rounding error, and financially, the company is effectively entirely dependent on free money from Google for making it the default search engine in Firefox. Mozilla's tried to stem the bleeding with deeply unpopular efforts like focusing on online advertising and cramming more and more "AI" into Firefox, but so far, nothing has worked, and more and more of the remaining small group of Firefox users are moving to modded versions of Firefox without the "AI" nonsense and other anti-features.
The task of turning the tide is now up to Mozilla's new CEO, Anthony Enzor-DeMeo, who took up the role starting today. In his first message to the public in his new role as CEO of Mozilla, he lays out his vision for the future of the company. What are his plans for Mozilla's most important product, the Firefox web browser?
Firefox will grow from a browser into a broader ecosystem of trusted software. Firefox will remain our anchor. It will evolve into a modern AI browser and support a portfolio of new and trusted software additions.
↫ Anthony Enzor-DeMeoSo far, the "AI" additions to Firefox have not exactly been met with thunderous applause – to put it mildly – and I don't see how increasing these efforts is going to magically turn that sentiment around. I'd hazard a guess that Firefox users, in particular, are probably quite averse to "AI" and what it stands for, further strengthening the feeling that the people leading Mozilla seem a little bit out of touch with their own users. Add to this the obvious fact that "AI" is a bubble waiting to pop, and I'm left wondering how investing in "AI" now is going to do anything but make Mozilla waste even more money.
I don't want Firefox to fail, as it is currently the only browser that isn't Chrome, Chrome in a trench coat, or Safari, but it seems Mozilla is trying to do everything to chase away what few users Firefox had left. In the short term, we can at least use modified versions of Firefox that have the "AI" nonsense and other anti-features removed, but for the long term, we're going to need something else if Mozilla keeps going down the same path it's been going in recent years. The only viable long-term alternative is Servo, but that's still a long way off from being a usable day-to-day browser.
The browser landscape ain't looking so hot, and this new Mozilla CEO is not making me feel any better.
Resolving to spend less time on your smartphone? Understanding your travel habits can help:
If you open a banking app, play a mobile game or scroll through a news feed every day while riding the bus, your commuting routine is probably bolstering your smartphone habit, according to new research that shows phone tendencies are stronger in locations chosen automatically.
As you ponder this year's potential New Year's resolutions, understanding your habits and what reinforces them is key to helping ensure your autopilot doesn't steer you in directions that conflict with your values and goals, said Oregon State University's Morgan Quinn Ross, who led the study.
"Habits are a direct driver of behavior, those activities we do frequently and without thinking," said Ross, assistant professor of communication in the OSU College of Liberal Arts. "Because they automate our cognition, habitual processes can make day-to-day life easier to navigate – but they can also ultimately make things harder on us. For better or worse, our habits have powerful implications for how we engage with the world around us."
Ross notes that past research has shown that "mobility choices" – where we go and how we get there – are largely a factor of habit, as are the ways and frequency in which we use our smartphones. Much less studied, however, is how those habits might feed off each other.
"The interaction between mobility choice habits and smartphone habits is ideally suited for analyzing interactive habitual processes in daily life," he said. "Unlike most habits, smartphone habits can come into play pretty much wherever you are."
Ross and collaborators at the Ohio State University, the University of Iowa and the National Chiao Tung University in Taiwan employed a specially designed app to collect millions of data points from 419 study participants over a two-week period.
The app tracked participants' travel routes, destinations and smartphone use, and also checked in with participants to see how automatically chosen their routes and destinations were. In addition, participants were surveyed about whether they used certain apps without thinking.
The scientists melded four indicators of spatial habits – route frequency, route automaticity, destination frequency and destination automaticity – with two measures of smartphone habits, app frequency and app automaticity, and found that smartphone habits are stronger in spaces chosen out of habit.
"That was true for social apps like Instagram, Reddit, Signal and TikTok, and also for non-social apps like Venmo or Asana," Ross said. "Social app habits, though, were less tethered to location than non-social app habits."
Regardless of type, apps used out of habit were used across spatial contexts and especially likely to be used in contexts selected based on habit. The study indicates the multiplicative potential of habitual processes in daily life, Ross said.
"Ultimately, although habits involve a lack of thinking, you can think about which habits you want to develop," he said. "We've shown that phone habits are tied to spatial habits, and that has implications for how we develop or break habits. We may try to cultivate a good habit of staying abreast of the news by reading news articles on the bus, or we may try to break a bad habit of overusing TikTok by not using it in bed."
Journal Reference: Ross, M.Q., Rhee, L., Le, H. et al. Smartphone habits are stronger in spaces chosen out of habit. Sci Rep 15, 41252 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-25174-2
Government seeks "nudity-detection algorithms" in iOS and Android, report says:
The UK government reportedly will "encourage" Apple and Google to prevent phones from displaying nude images except when users verify that they are adults.
The forthcoming push for nudity-blocking systems was reported by the Financial Times today [Paywalled --JE]. The report said the UK won't institute a legal requirement "for now." But asking companies to block nude images could be the first step toward making it mandatory if the government doesn't get what it wants.
"The UK government wants technology companies to block explicit images on phones and computers by default to protect children, with adults having to verify their age to create and access such content," the FT report said. "Ministers want the likes of Apple and Google to incorporate nudity-detection algorithms into their device operating systems to prevent users taking photos or sharing images of genitalia unless they are verified as adults."
If the UK gets its way, operating systems like iOS and Android would "prevent any nudity being displayed on screen unless the user has verified they are an adult through methods such as biometric checks or official ID. Child sex offenders would be required to keep such blockers enabled." The Home Office "has initially focused on mobile devices," but the push could be expanded to desktops, the FT said. Government officials point out that Microsoft can already scan for "inappropriate content" in Microsoft Teams, the report said.
[...] Apple and Google both provide optional tools that let parents control what content their children can access. The companies could object to mandates on privacy grounds, as they have in other venues.
When Texas enacted an age-verification law for app stores, Apple and Google said they would comply but warned of risks to user privacy. A lobby group that represents Apple, Google, and other tech firms then sued Texas in an attempt to prevent the law from taking effect, saying it "imposes a broad censorship regime on the entire universe of mobile apps."
There's another age-verification battle in Australia, where the government decided to ban social media for users under 16. Companies said they would comply, although Reddit sued Australia on Friday in a bid to overturn the law.
Apple this year also fought a UK demand that it create a backdoor for government security officials to access encrypted data. The Trump administration claimed it convinced the UK to drop its demand, but the UK is reportedly still seeking an Apple backdoor.
In another case, the image-sharing website Imgur blocked access for UK users starting in September while facing an investigation over its age-verification practices.
Google has increasingly moved toward keeping features locked to its hardware products, but the Translate app is bucking that trend. The live translate feature is breaking out of the Google bubble with support for any earbuds you happen to have connected to your Android phone. The app is also getting improved translation quality across dozens of languages and some Duolingo-like learning features.
The latest version of Google's live translation is built on Gemini and initially rolled out earlier this year. It supports smooth back-and-forth translations as both on-screen text and audio. Beginning a live translate session in Google Translate used to require Pixel Buds, but that won't be the case going forward.
Google says a beta test of expanded headphone support is launching today in the US, Mexico, and India. The audio translation attempts to preserve the tone and cadence of the original speaker, but it's not as capable as the full AI-reproduced voice translations you can do on the latest Pixel phones. Google says this feature should work on any earbuds or headphones, but it's only for Android right now. The feature will expand to iOS in the coming months. Apple does have a similar live translation feature on the iPhone, but it requires AirPods.
Regardless of whether you're using live translate or just checking a single phrase, Google claims the Gemini-powered upgrade will serve you well. Google Translate is now apparently better at understanding the nuance of languages, with an awareness of idioms and local slang. Google uses the example of "stealing my thunder," which wouldn't make a lick of sense when translated literally into other languages. The new translation model, which is also available in the search-based translation interface, supports over 70 languages.
Google also debuted language-learning features earlier this year, borrowing a page from educational apps like Duolingo. You can tell the app your skill level with a language, as well as whether you need help with travel-oriented conversations or more everyday interactions. The app uses this to create tailored listening and speaking exercises.
With this big update, Translate will be more of a stickler about your pronunciation. Google promises more feedback and tips based on your spoken replies in the learning modules. The app will also now keep track of how often you complete language practice, showing your daily streak in the app.
If "number go up" will help you learn more, then this update is for you. Practice mode is also launching in almost 20 new countries, including Germany, India, Sweden, and Taiwan.
As reported in The Guardian, billboards that monitor people's responses have been installed inside apartment blocks in twenty British cities.
The billboards are supplied by 30Seconds Group who say there could be such billboards installed in the communal areas of a thousand buildings by the end of the year.
The billboards are placed in locations where people have no option but to be observed, such as areas where they wait for lifts (elevators) to arrive.
Jake Hurfurt from Big Brother Watch was quoted as saying, "We should all be able to move around the buildings we live in without being scanned against our will to monitor our personal characteristics or if we paid attention to an advert, and it is even more galling that residents of some buildings have to pay to be watched."
https://www.techradar.com/pro/security/uk-strengthens-subsea-cables-against-russian-interference
The UK government has started working on Atlantic Bastion, a new military program aimed at strengthening the security of its undersea critical infrastructure.
In a press release published on the UK.gov site earlier this week, it was said that Atlantic Bastion's goal was to secure these assets from Russian undersea threats.
Russian submarine and underwater activity has reportedly picked up in recent years, and the country has been hard at work modernizing its fleet "to target critical undersea cables and pipelines". Europe's eastern neighbor has allegedly been seen mapping out key locations of undersea critical infrastructure, with the UK government mentioning Russian spy ship Yantar that was recently spotted "around UK waters".
This year alone, the UK will have invested "millions of pounds" into development and testing of innovative anti-submarine sensor technology.
Atlantic Bastion will be a combination of autonomous surface and underwater vessels, cutting-edge digital infrastructure, and warships and patrol aircraft. This will enable the UK navy to act against its adversaries "with unprecedented effectiveness across vast areas of ocean".
The next phase of action, which should kick off "in the coming weeks", is to take the projects from concept to the frontline. Some capabilities are expected to be deployed in the water next year, with investments accelerating in the year that follows.
In recent months, multiple undersea internet (fibre-optic) cables in the Baltic Sea region have been damaged or cut. Many observers believe it to be closely tied to the Russia-Ukraine war. In November 2024 two major submarine data cables, including C‑Lion1 (which connects Finland and Germany), were discovered damaged or severed, and around the same time, a fibre-optic cable between Lithuania and Sweden (via the island of Gotland) was also cut.
In late December 2024, another incident hit a power cable between Finland and Estonia, and multiple associated telecom cables were reportedly disrupted too. A vessel believed linked to Russia's so-called "shadow fleet" was seized by Finnish authorities in connection with that outage.
It isn't apparent what autonomous vessels and patrol aircraft have to do with strengthening the cables. --Ed.
Some of the earliest plants attracted pollinators by producing heat that made these plants glow with infrared light, according to a new set of experiments.
The work, published in the journal Science, suggests that long before brightly colored flowers evolved, these ancient plants would metabolically rev themselves up when they had pollen at the ready. Nocturnal insects such as beetles could then see that heat from afar and home in on the target.
These heat-producing plants, called cycads, exist today in tropical forests around the world, although they're one of the most endangered plant groups.
"Some people call them dinosaur plants because they were much more dominant when the dinosaurs were around," says Wendy Valencia-Montoya, a cycad expert at Harvard University.
Fossils from over 200 million years ago, compared to cycads that exist today, show that "the plants look exactly the same," she says. "So they haven't changed much in hundreds of millions of years."
They're related to pines, and male and female plants each produce fleshy, pine-cone-like structures that contain the pollen and the seeds. "That's something very unique among this group of ancient plants," says Valencia-Montoya, who says these are the oldest known plants that have pollen.
A couple of centuries ago, botanists noticed that these plants produced heat in their reproductive structures. Compared to the ambient air temperature, they can be hotter by 15 to 25 degrees Fahrenheit, or even more.
"We think of producing heat as something that mammals do, or birds do, but in fact, plants can do it too," she says, although it's not common in the plant world and takes a lot of energy.
[...] To try to understand more about what was going on, Valencia-Montoya and her colleagues painted some pollinating beetles with fluorescent markers to watch when the beetles went to the plant. And they found that the beetles were clearly going to the plant cones when they heated up.
[...] And when they looked at those beetles, they found that they have specialized antennae that have evolved to detect slight differences in temperature — similar to the heat-sensing receptors used by snakes to detect prey.
What's more, it turns out that the beetles' antennae seem to be tuned to the exact temperature range deployed by their host plant, since different beetle species frequent different cycad species.
"Infrared radiation is perhaps the oldest discovered pollination signal," says Nicholas Bellono of Harvard University, one of the authors of the new study.
Back when plants first evolved pollen, the insects that were around were nocturnal and had poor vision, says Valencia-Montoya. "So it makes a lot of sense that a signal like heat was guiding them."
But as new groups emerged that were active in the day and had better vision, like butterflies and bees, "it makes more sense for plants to change their signaling strategy to also tap into the sensory systems of these more recent pollinators," she says, adding that in evolution, there's a constant dance back and forth between plants and their pollinators. Once color became a possible signal, flowering plants had an immense range of color combinations at their disposal, allowing them to rapidly diversify.
These researchers used "a powerhouse of techniques" to prove that the temperature of cycad's heat-producing cones is intimately related to attracting pollinators, and that this association is ancient, says Roger Seymour, with the University of Adelaide in Australia, who wasn't part of the research team: "This is an important contribution."
Seymour thinks that heat could have more than one role, however, and the chance for a warm-up may be a bonus for beetles that require high body temperatures for activity. "Heat can be a direct energy reward to insect pollinators which may remain inside a thermogenic flower for much longer than insects visiting non-thermogenic species," he says.
Irene Terry at Tthe University of Utah, an ecologist who specializes in cycads and their insect interactions but wasn't part of this research team, says it's only been relatively recently that people realized these ancient plants even had pollinators, rather than just spreading their pollen with the wind.
[...] "I was not surprised at all that infrared was involved," says Terry, given that other insects like mosquitoes use infrared to find their way to a target. "There's a range of things that insects can see that we don't."
[...] "The infrared is an entirely different world that we don't experience," he says. "I think that's a cool thing to think about, going back in time, that this signal was around when the dinosaurs were there, long before us. And the beetles still use it to this day and are still experiencing that world."
Journal Reference: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adz1728
Foxconn is investing $174 million into a new facility in Louisville, Kentucky, but nothing points to it becoming part of Apple's supply chain.
Apple supply chain partner Foxconn is making moves to expand its footprint in the United States again. This time, it's building up its operations in Kentucky.
Announcements from Louisville Mayor Craig Greenberg and Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear confirmed that Foxconn will be opening "it's first U.S. manufacturing operation" in Louisville. The investment, which is claimed to be worth about $174 million, will potentially create 180 new jobs in the region.
It will involve a 350,000-square-foot warehouse, located on Randy Coe Lane, as part of a 23-acre property. The existing warehouse will be refitted to serve as a factory, with permits uncovered by Louisville Business First revealing that the upgrades will cost Foxconn $62.5 million in two phases.
The first phase, which will cost $10 million, will deal with the installation of new concrete foundations to handle heavy manufacturing equipment and interior-only changes, the permits state. Phase 2 will cost a further $52.5 million and will involve the final build-out and installation of equipment.
Foxconn's upgrades also seemingly have a quick turnaround time. The facility is expected to start operations in the third quarter of 2026.
While Foxconn will be footing most of the bill, there are some incentives in place from the state to assist with its creation. This includes a 10-year incentive agreement from the Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority valued at up to $3.4 million, as well as a further $600,000 in tax incentives.
In announcing the facility, Mayor Greenberg said the investment will bring "good-paying jobs, new opportunities, and lasting economic growth to our community." Governor Beshear expressed he expects there to be "years of success" for the facility.
Foxconn USA CEO Ben Liaw declared, "This is more than a new factory - it's a new chapter in American manufacturing."
While important for Louisville, the announcement does still leave out some details about what the factory will be used for. There are mentions of it manufacturing electronics, but not what kind will be made.
Of course, given Foxconn's general sense of discretion for its clients, as well as Apple's historic secrecy, it would decline to say who the factory is intended for.
Apple is a long-time partner of Foxconn, so immediate thoughts would turn to its product catalog. But, the relatively small scale and size of investment doesn't really point to it being for some of Apple's major products.
At Apple's scale of production, there's no way it can be for something like an iPhone or iPad. Add in that Apple would have to secure multiple sizable suppliers in the area, and that rules out most of the biggest items in Apple's catalog.
It could be used for lines with lower sales volumes, but again, there would be a need to establish a supply chain that meets Apple's exacting standards.
The chance of this being an Apple-centric facility is very slim, based on its size and Apple's existing supply chain sprawl.
Since Foxconn is a contract manufacturer for many big names in tech, there are a lot of potential clients that could take advantage of such an operation. There's every chance it will be used for one of Foxconn's other partners.
A further clue that this may not be Apple are claims that the facility will use AI and robotics in "all phases of production," including design and assembly.
Apple certainly has expressed a need for manufacturers to invest in automation, and the use of robotics would certainly help meet this goal. There have also been claims from U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick that Apple was waiting on the right "robotic arms" to bring manufacturing to the United States.
However, the description that AI will be used in design at the facility rubs against Apple's typical manufacturing processes. With it keen to work on its own designs and bring elements in-house, it's extremely unlikely for Apple to then allow Foxconn to make designs for its products using different AI.
Apple may want to get U.S. manufacturing up and running, but it will be a monumental effort. This doesn't seem like it.
https://itsfoss.com/news/tor-rust-rewrite-progress/
Arti, the Rust rewrite of Tor, brings circuit isolation and onion service improvements in its 1.8.0 release.
The Tor Project has been busy with the rustification of their offering for quite some time now.
If you have used Tor Browser, you know what it does. Anonymous browsing through encrypted relay chains. The network itself has been running since the early 2000s. All of it is built on C.
But that C codebase is an issue. It is known to have buffer overflows, use-after-free bugs, and memory corruption vulnerabilities. That is why they introduced Arti, a Rust rewrite of Tor that tackles these flaws by leveraging the memory safety of the programming language.
A new release of Arti just dropped last week, so let's check it out!
We begin with the main highlight of this release, the rollout of the circuit timeout rework that was laid out in proposal 368. Tor currently uses something called Circuit Dirty Timeout (CDT). It is a single timer that controls when your connection circuits become unavailable and when they close down.
Unfortunately, it is predictable. Someone monitoring traffic can spot these patterns and potentially track your activity. Arti 1.8.0 fixes this by implementing usage-based timeouts with separate timers. One handles when circuits accept new connections. Another closes idle circuits at random times instead of fixed intervals.
This should reduce the risk of fingerprinting from predictable timeout behavior.
Next up is the new experimental arti hsc ctor-migrate command that lets onion service operators migrate their restricted discovery keys from the C-based Tor to Arti's keystore.
These keys handle client authorization for onion services. The command transfers them over without requiring operators to do the manual legwork. The release also delivers improvements for routing architecture, protocol implementation, directory cache support, and OR port listener configuration.
You can go through the changelog to learn more about the Arti 1.8.0 release.
= Links in article:
https://www.torproject.org/
https://blog.torproject.org/announcing-arti/
https://blog.torproject.org/arti_1_8_0_released/
https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/arti/-/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md?arti-180--1-december-2025
https://spec.torproject.org/proposals/368-cdt-rethink.html
https://support.torproject.org/tor-browser/features/onion-services/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Device_fingerprint
https://rust-lang.org/
The American consumer is speaking clearly and they want the benefits of electrification like instant torque and mobile power. But they also demand affordability:
Just four years after it was launched, the Ford Motor Company has pulled the plug on its electric F-150 Lightning truck. The company instead will reportedly be focusing on hybrid vehicles and a future lineup of smaller and more affordable electric vehicles.
In a call with reporters on Monday, Andrew Frick, the president of Ford Blue and Ford Model E, the company's commercial and electric divisions, said, "The American consumer is speaking clearly and they want the benefits of electrification like instant torque and mobile power. But they also demand affordability ... rather than spending billions more on large EVs that now have no path to profitability, we are allocating that money into higher-returning areas," per NPR.
When the truck was announced in 2021, the company said that it would cost just $40,000. However, once trucks began to roll off the production line, the company was unable to hit this target. For the 2025 model, the price started at around $55,000. Ford also reportedly lost money on every vehicle, despite the higher price point, with electric vehicle sales being lower in recent years than expected, and production costs not coming down.
[...] With the end of the Lightning electric truck, the company will pivot its Kentucky battery production site to build batteries for storage instead of trucks. These batteries could be used for the electric as well as data centers and other industrial customers, the company said.
Previously:
After 50 Years, MIT Chemists Finally Synthesize Elusive Anti-Cancer Compound
MIT chemists have, for the first time, successfully created in the laboratory a fungal molecule called verticillin A. This compound was first discovered more than 50 years ago and has been recognized for its potential as an anticancer agent.
Although verticillin A differs from some related molecules by only a small number of atoms, its complex structure made it much more challenging to synthesize than those similar compounds.
"We have a much better appreciation for how those subtle structural changes can significantly increase the synthetic challenge," says Mohammad Movassaghi, an MIT professor of chemistry. "Now we have the technology where we can not only access them for the first time, more than 50 years after they were isolated, but also we can make many designed variants, which can enable further detailed studies."
In experiments with human cancer cells, one modified form of verticillin A showed strong activity against a rare pediatric brain tumor known as diffuse midline glioma. The researchers caution that additional testing will be necessary before its suitability for clinical use can be determined.
Researchers first reported the isolation of verticillin A from fungi, which use it for protection against pathogens, in 1970. Verticillin A and related fungal compounds have drawn interest for their potential anticancer and antimicrobial activity, but their complexity has made them difficult to synthesize.
In 2009, Movassaghi's lab reported the synthesis of (+)-11,11′-dideoxyverticillin A, a fungal compound similar to verticillin A. That molecule has 10 rings and eight stereogenic centers, or carbon atoms that have four different chemical groups attached to them. These groups have to be attached in a way that ensures they have the correct orientation, or stereochemistry, with respect to the rest of the molecule.
Once that synthesis was achieved, however, synthesis of verticillin A remained challenging, even though the only difference between verticillin A and (+)-11,11′-dideoxyverticillin A is the presence of two oxygen atoms.
"Those two oxygens greatly limit the window of opportunity that you have in terms of doing chemical transformations," Movassaghi says. "It makes the compound so much more fragile, so much more sensitive, so that even though we had had years of methodological advances, the compound continued to pose a challenge for us."
Both of the verticillin A compounds consist of two identical fragments that must be joined together to form a molecule called a dimer. To create (+)-11,11′-dideoxyverticillin A, the researchers had performed the dimerization reaction near the end of the synthesis, then added four critical carbon-sulfur bonds.
Yet when trying to synthesize verticillin A, the researchers found that waiting to add those carbon-sulfur bonds at the end did not result in the correct stereochemistry. As a result, the researchers had to rethink their approach and ended up creating a very different synthetic sequence.
"What we learned was the timing of the events is absolutely critical. We had to significantly change the order of the bond-forming events," Movassaghi says.
The verticillin A synthesis begins with an amino acid derivative known as beta-hydroxytryptophan, and then step-by-step, the researchers add a variety of chemical functional groups, including alcohols, ketones, and amides, in a way that ensures the correct stereochemistry.
A functional group containing two carbon-sulfur bonds and a disulfide bond were introduced early on, to help control the stereochemistry of the molecule, but the sensitive disulfides had to be "masked" and protected as a pair of sulfides to prevent them from breakdown under subsequent chemical reactions. The disulfide-containing groups were then regenerated after the dimerization reaction.
"This particular dimerization really stands out in terms of the complexity of the substrates that we're bringing together, which have such a dense array of functional groups and stereochemistry," Movassaghi says.
The overall synthesis requires 16 steps from the beta-hydroxytryptophan starting material to verticillin A.
Once the researchers had successfully completed the synthesis, they were also able to tweak it to generate derivates of verticillin A. Researchers at Dana-Farber then tested these compounds against several types of diffuse midline glioma (DMG), a rare brain tumor that has few treatment options.
The researchers found that the DMG cell lines most susceptible to these compounds were those that have high levels of a protein called EZHIP. This protein, which plays a role in the methylation of DNA, has been previously identified as a potential drug target for DMG.
"Identifying the potential targets of these compounds will play a critical role in further understanding their mechanism of action, and more importantly, will help optimize the compounds from the Movassaghi lab to be more target specific for novel therapy development," Qi says.
The verticillin derivatives appear to interact with EZHIP in a way that increases DNA methylation, which induces the cancer cells to under programmed cell death. The compounds that were most successful at killing these cells were N-sulfonylated (+)-11,11′-dideoxyverticillin A and N-sulfonylated verticillin A. N-sulfonylation — the addition of a functional group containing sulfur and oxygen — makes the molecules more stable.
"The natural product itself is not the most potent, but it's the natural product synthesis that brought us to a point where we can make these derivatives and study them," Movassaghi says.
The Dana-Farber team is now working on further validating the mechanism of action of the verticillin derivatives, and they also hope to begin testing the compounds in animal models of pediatric brain cancers.
"Natural compounds have been valuable resources for drug discovery, and we will fully evaluate the therapeutic potential of these molecules by integrating our expertise in chemistry, chemical biology, cancer biology, and patient care. We have also profiled our lead molecules in more than 800 cancer cell lines, and will be able to understand their functions more broadly in other cancers," Qi says.
Reference: “Total Synthesis and Anticancer Study of (+)-Verticillin A” by Walker Knauss, Xiuqi Wang, Mariella G. Filbin, Jun Qi and Mohammad Movassaghi, 2 December 2025, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
https://www.wired.com/story/fulu-repair-bounties-nest-molekule/
Companies tend to be rather picky about who gets to poke around inside their products. Manufacturers sometimes even take steps that prevent consumers from repairing their device when it breaks, or modifying it with third-party products.
But those unsanctioned device modifications have become the raison d'être of a bounty program set up by a nonprofit called Fulu, or Freedom from Unethical Limitations on Users. The group tries to spotlight the ways companies can slip consumer-unfriendly features into their products, and it offers cash rewards in the thousands of dollars to anyone who can figure out how to disable unpopular features or bring discontinued products back to life.
"We want to be able to show lawmakers, look at all these things that could be out in the world," says right-to-repair advocate and Fulu cofounder Kevin O'Reilly. "Look at the ways we could be giving device owners control over their stuff."
Fulu has already awarded bounties for two fixes. One revives an older generation of Nest Thermostats no longer supported by Google. And just yesterday, Fulu announced a fix that circumvents restrictive digital-rights-management software on Molekule air purifiers.
Fulu is run by O'Reilly and fellow repair advocate and YouTuber Louis Rossmann, who announced the effort in a video on his channel in June.
The basic concept of Fulu is that it works like a bug bounty, the long running practice in software development where devs will offer prize money to people who find and fix a bug in the operating system. Fulu adopts that model, but the bounty it offers is usually meant to "fix" something the manufacturer considers an intended feature but turns out to be detrimental to the user experience. That can mean a device where the manufacturer has put in restrictions to prevent users from repairing their device, blocked the use of third-party replacement parts, or ended software support entirely.
"Innovation used to mean going from black-and-white to color," Rossmann says. "Now innovation means we have the ability to put DRM in an air filter."
Fulu offers up a bounty of $10,000 to the first person to prove they have a fix for the offending feature of a device. Donors can also pool money to help incentivize tinkerers to fix a particular product, which Fulu will match up to another $10,000. The pot grows as donations roll in.
Bounties are set on devices that Rossmann and O'Reilly have deemed deliberately hostile to the owners that have already paid for them, like some GE refrigerators that have DRM-locked water filters, and the Molekule air purifiers with DRM software that blocks customers from using third-party air filters. A bounty on the XBox Series X seeks a workaround to software encryption on the disk drive that prevents replacing the part without manufacturer approval. Thanks to donations, the prize for the Xbox fix has climbed to more than $30,000.
Sounds like a sweet payout for sure, but there is risk involved.
Fixing devices, even ones disabled and discontinued by the manufacturer, is often in direct violation of Section 1201 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, the 1998 US law that prevents bypassing passwords and encryption or selling equipment that could do so without manufacturer permission. Break into a device, futz with the software inside to keep it functional, or go around DRM restrictions, and you risk running afoul of the likes of Google's gargantuan legal arm. Fulu warns potential bounty hunters they must tackle this goal knowing full well they're doing so in open violation of Section 1201.
"The dampening effect on innovation and control and ownership are so massive," O'Reilly says. "We want to prove that these kinds of things can exist."
In October, Google ended software support for its first- and second-generation Nest thermostats. For lots of users, the devices still worked but couldn't be controlled anymore, because the software was no longer supported. Users lamented that their fancy thermostats had now become hunks of e-waste on their walls.
Fulu set up a bounty that called for a software fix to restore functionality to the affected Nest devices. Cody Kociemba, a longtime follower of Rossmann's YouTube channel and a Nest user himself, was eager to take the bounty on. (He has "beef with Google," he says on his website.) After a few days of tinkering with the Nest software, Kociemba had a solution. He made his fix publicly available on GitHub so users could download it and restore their thermostats. Kociemba also started No Longer Evil, a site devoted to his workaround of Nest thermostats and perhaps hacks of future Google products to come.
"My moral belief is that this should be accessible to people," Kociemba says.
Kociemba submitted his fix to Fulu, but discovered that another developer, calling themselves Team Dinosaur, had just submitted a fix slightly before Kociemba did. Still, Fulu paid out the full amount to both, roughly $14,000 apiece. Kociemba was surprised by that, as he thought he had lost the race or that he might have to split the prize money.
O'Reilly says that while they probably won't do double payouts again, both fixes worked, so it was important for Fulu's first payout to show support for the people willing to take the risk of sharing their fixes.
"Folks like Cody who are willing to put it out there, make the calculated risk that Google isn't going to sue them, and maybe save some thermostats from the junk heap and keep consumers from having to pay $700 or whatever after installation to get something new," O'Reilly says. "It's been cool to watch."
This week, Fulu announced it had paid out its second-ever bounty. It was for a Molekule Air Pro and Air Mini, air purifier systems that used an NFC chip in its filters to ensure the replacement filters were made by Molekule and not a third-party manufacturer. The goal was to disable the DRM and let the machine use any filter that fit.
Lorenzo Rizzotti, an Italian student and coder who had gone from playing Minecraft as a kid to reverse engineering and hacking, submitted proof that he had solved the problem, and was awarded the Fulu bounty.
"Once you buy a device, it's your hardware, it's no longer theirs," Rizzotti says. "You should be able to do whatever. I find it absurd that it's illegal."
But unlike Kociemba, he wasn't about to share the fix. Though he was able to fix the problem, he doesn't feel safe weathering the potential legal ramifications that he might face if he released the solution publicly.
"I proved that I can do it," he says. "And that was it."
Still, Fulu awarded him the bounty. O'Reilly says the goal of the project is less about getting actual fixes out in the world, and more about calling attention to the lengths companies are allowed to go to wrest control from their users under the auspices of Section 1201.
"We need to show how ridiculous it is that this 27-year-old law is preventing these solutions from seeing the light of day," O'Reilly says. "It's time for the laws to catch up with technology."
Norovirus Cases Surging in U.S.:
Cases of "winter vomiting disease," also known as norovirus, are rising ahead of schedule this year. Alexey Kuzma/Stocksy
- "Winter vomiting disease" is on the rise across the United States, with norovirus cases surging since mid-October.
- Wastewater surveillance and CDC testing indicate that norovirus is spreading earlier and faster than usual, particularly in Louisiana, Michigan, and Indiana.
- The virus spreads easily through contaminated food, water, hands, and surfaces, and symptoms can appear within a short period.
- Preventing infection from norovirus includes proper handwashing, disinfecting surfaces, avoiding shared food or utensils, and staying home and hydrated if you become sick.
Rising norovirus cases across the United States have many people wary of contracting the so-called "winter vomiting disease."
Data from WastewaterSCAN, a national monitoring program run by Stanford and Emory University, shows that norovirus levels have been rising since mid-October, with notable increases detected in Louisiana, Michigan, and Indiana.
Recent data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) show 153 norovirus outbreaks reported from August to mid-November. The surge is considered ahead of schedule for the season, which typically peaks from November to April.
Despite this increase, norovirus outbreak trends are currently lower than last year, with 235 norovirus outbreaks reported during the same time period in 2024.
Norovirus is a highly contagious virus that spreads rapidly through contaminated food, water, hands, and surfaces.
With holiday travel and crowded indoor gatherings underway, conditions are ideal for the rapid transmission of this infectious disease, known to cause unpleasant gastrointestinal side effects.
Holiday travel and an increase in social gatherings can also contribute to the spread of norovirus.
"Close quarters and sharing food or being on crowded buses and trains, as well as touching so many things, create an environment that will allow Norovirus to spread before you even realise you've come into contact with someone who has it," Tesfu said.
Cold weather can also affect how well our immune system defends us. Lower vitamin D levels in winter and drier air can weaken natural immune barriers, making it easier for viruses like norovirus to spread.
Colder temps play a part, too. "The virus survives better in cool, dry air," Paria Sanaty Zadeh, PharmD, clinical pharmacist at Drugwatch, told Healthline.
Many people associate norovirus outbreaks with cruise ships, but the virus can also present in various other settings, including schools and nursing homes.
Norovirus infection may lead to telltale symptoms of vomiting and diarrhea, as the virus primarily affects the gut.
"Unlike the flu, norovirus targets the gut," Zadeh said. "It's a viral gastroenteritis, [or] what people call a 'stomach bug,' even though the virus affects the small intestine more than the stomach."
Norovirus typically has an abrupt onset, manifesting as vomiting and diarrhea, and is highly contagious.
"Getting it from contaminated hands or food is most common, either touching something contaminated and then touching your mouth, or eating something contaminated," Zadeh said.
"You can get it from touching a surface that wasn't cleaned well after someone was sick, then touching your mouth. And you only need a tiny amount of the virus to get infected. It moves and spreads easily."
Verizon changed policy after he bought the phone, wouldn't unlock it despite FCC rule.
When Verizon refused to unlock an iPhone purchased by Kansas resident Patrick Roach, he had no intention of giving up without a fight. Roach sued the wireless carrier in small claims court and won.
Roach bought a discounted iPhone 16e from Verizon's Straight Talk brand on February 28, 2025, as a gift for his wife's birthday. He intended to pay for one month of service, cancel, and then switch the phone to the US Mobile service plan that the couple uses. Under federal rules that apply to Verizon and a Verizon unlocking policy that was in place when Roach bought the phone, this strategy should have worked.
"The best deals tend to be buying it from one of these MVNOs [Mobile Virtual Network Operators] and then activating it until it unlocks and then switching it to whatever you are planning to use it with. It usually saves you about half the value of the phone," Roach said in a phone interview.
Unlocking a phone allows it to be used with another carrier. Verizon, unlike other carriers, is required by the Federal Communications Commission to unlock phones shortly after they are activated on its network. Verizon gained significant benefits in exchange for agreeing to the unlocking requirement, first in 2008 when it purchased licenses to use 700 MHz spectrum that came with open access requirements and then in 2021 when it agreed to merger conditions to obtain approval for its purchase of TracFone.
Verizon is thus required to unlock handsets 60 days after they are activated on its network. This applies to Verizon's flagship brand and TracFone brands such as Straight Talk.
"That was the compromise. For their competitive advantage of acquiring the spectrum, they had to give up the ability to lock down phones for an extended period of time," Roach said.
But 60 days after Roach activated his phone, Verizon refused to unlock it. Verizon claimed it didn't have to because of a recent policy change in which Verizon decided to only unlock devices after "60 days of paid active service." Roach had only paid for one month of service on the phone.
The FCC-imposed restriction says Verizon must unlock phones 60 days after activation and doesn't say that Verizon may refuse to unlock a phone when a customer has not maintained paid service for 60 days. Moreover, Verizon implemented its "60 days of paid active service" policy for TracFone brands and Verizon prepaid phones on April 1, 2025, over a month after Roach bought the phone.
Company policy at the time Roach made the purchase was to unlock phones 60 days after activation, with no mention of needing 60 days of paid active service. In other words, Roach bought the phone under one policy, and Verizon refused to unlock it based on a different policy it implemented over a month later. Verizon's attempt to retroactively enforce its new policy on Roach was not looked upon favorably by a magistrate judge in District Court of Sedgwick County, Kansas.
"Under the KCPA [Kansas Consumer Protection Act], a consumer is not required to prove intent to defraud. The fact that after plaintiff purchased the phone, the defendant changed the requirements for unlocking it so that plaintiff could go to a different network essentially altered the nature of the device purchased... With the change in defendant's unlocking policy, the phone was essentially useless for the purpose plaintiff intended when he purchased it," Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Henry wrote in an October 2025 ruling.
There's still the question of why Verizon and its brands are demanding 60 days of paid active service before unlocking phones when the FCC-imposed conditions require it to unlock phones 60 days after activation. Roach filed a complaint to the FCC, alleging that Verizon violated the conditions. Verizon has meanwhile petitioned the FCC to eliminate the 60-day requirement altogether.
Before his small-claims court win, Roach turned down a Verizon settlement offer of $600 plus court fees because he didn't want to give up the right to speak about the case publicly. Roach said he filed an arbitration case against Verizon nearly a decade ago on a different matter related to gift cards that were supposed to be provided through a device recycling program. He said he can't reveal details about the settlement in that previous case because of a non-disclosure agreement.
After refusing Verizon's settlement offer in the new case, Roach gained a modest financial benefit from his court victory. The judge ordered Verizon to pay back the $410.40 he paid for the device, plus court costs and service fees.
When it appeared that the Straight Talk iPhone wouldn't be unlocked, Roach decided to buy an unlocked phone from Costco for $643.93. But he ended up returning that phone to Costco and paying Straight Talk for a second month of service to get the original phone unlocked, he said.
The now-unlocked phone—the one he bought from Straight Talk—is being used by his wife on their US Mobile plan. The court-ordered refund check that Verizon sent Roach included the phone cost and one month of service fees, he said.
Roach estimated he spent 20 or so hours on the suit, including arranging to have a summons served on Verizon and arguing his case in a court hearing. Roach didn't get much of a payout considering the amount of time he spent, "but it wasn't about that," he said.
Roach provided Ars with the emails in which Verizon offered the $600 settlement. A Verizon executive relations employee wrote to Roach, "My offer is not an admission of guilt but trying to extend the olive branch."
In his email declining the offer, Roach told Verizon, "I highly value the non-monetary outcomes I would achieve in court—transparency, accountability, and the absence of restrictions such as NDAs. Any settlement proposal that requires me to remain silent about the issue, while offering only modest monetary compensation, is less attractive to me than pursuing the matter through judgment. If Verizon Value is genuinely interested in settlement, the offer would need to reflect both the tangible costs I've incurred and the intangible but significant benefits the company receives by avoiding litigation and publicity."
"It was really starting to irk me"The FCC has taken no action on Roach's complaint, and in fact, the commission could allow Verizon to scrap the 60-day requirement. As we reported in May, Verizon petitioned the FCC to let it lock phones to its network for longer periods of time. This would make it harder for customers to switch to other carriers, but Verizon claims longer locking periods are necessary to deter fraud.
The FCC hasn't ruled yet on Verizon's petition. Roach says Verizon seems to be acting as if it can change the rules without waiting for the FCC to do so formally. "It was really starting to irk me that they were basically just going ahead with it anyways while they had an open request," Roach said.
He doesn't expect the FCC to penalize Verizon, though. "It's just kind of slimy of them, so I feel like it deserves a spotlight," he said. "I'm not sure with the current state of the FCC that anything would happen, but the rule of law should be respected."
The Verizon petition to relax the unlocking requirements was opposed in a filing by Public Knowledge and other consumer advocacy groups. Public Knowledge Legal Director John Bergmayer, who wrote the filing, told Ars that Roach "has a pretty strong argument under the law as it stands."
Verizon must unlock phones automaticallyThe unlocking rules applying to Verizon used to be stricter, resulting in the company selling phones that were already unlocked. In 2019, Verizon requested a waiver to let it lock phones for 60 days.
The FCC granted the waiver in June 2019, allowing Verizon "to lock a customer's handset for 60 days from the date it becomes active on Verizon's network" and requiring it to unlock the handset once the period is over. This condition was expanded to TracFone and its brands such as Straight Talk in the 2021 merger, with the FCC approval stating that "For 700 MHz C Block TracFone devices that operate on the Verizon network and are capable of unlocking automatically (e.g., Apple devices), they will unlock automatically 60 days after activation."
The 2019 waiver grant said Verizon must automatically unlock phones after 60 days "regardless of whether: (1) the customer asks for the handset to be unlocked, or (2) the handset is fully paid off." The FCC order specifies that "the only exception to the rule will be that Verizon will not have to automatically unlock handsets that it determines within the 60-day period to have been purchased through fraud."
Bergmayer said the FCC order "granting the waiver just starts a countdown, with no 'paid service' requirement, or room for Verizon to just impose one. Many people may use prepaid phones that they don't keep in continuous service but just charge up as needed. Maybe people are fine with just having Wi-Fi on their phones for a while if they're at home anyway."
Given the restrictive nature of the FCC conditions, "I don't think that can be read to allow a paid service requirement," Bergmayer said. But as a practical matter, the FCC under Chairman Brendan Carr has been aggressively eliminating regulations that apply to telecom carriers under Carr's "Delete, Delete, Delete" initiative. To actually enforce Verizon's obligations under the current rules, "you have to convince the current FCC not to just change it," Bergmayer said.
The FCC and Verizon did not respond to requests for comment.
Retroactive policy change irked other buyers, tooRoach wasn't the only person whose plans to buy a discounted phone were thwarted by Verizon refusing to unlock the device after 60 days. Roach had learned of the discount offer from a Slick Deals thread. Eventually, users posting in that thread started reporting that they weren't able to get the phone unlocked.
"My status: I used 30 days with Straight Talk. Waited another 35 days but it did not unlock," one person wrote.
Some people in the thread said they canceled after 30 days, like Roach did, but eventually bought a second month of service in order to get the unlock. Although Verizon and its brands are required to unlock phones automatically, some commenters said they had to contact Straight Talk support to get an unlock. "Needless to say this has been an arduous journey. Good luck to others and hope you manage to successfully unlock your devices as well," one user wrote.
There's also a Reddit thread started by someone who said they bought a Samsung phone in February and complained that Straight Talk refused to honor the unlocking policy that was in place at the time.
"I called to ask for the phone to be unlocked on April 16 but was told it can't be unlocked since it did not have 60 days of paid service," the Reddit user wrote. "When I said that was not the policy on phones activated prior to April 1, the rep told me 'we have the right to change our policy.' I agreed, they do [have] the right to change their policy GOING FORWARD but can't change the rules going backwards. He disagreed."
FCC complaint didn't go anywhereRoach's FCC complaint received a response from Verizon, but nothing substantial from the FCC itself. "There's not really any sort of moderation or mediation from the FCC, it's just kind of a dialogue between you and the other party. And I'm not really sure if any human eyes from the government even look at it. It's probably just a data point," Roach said.
Roach had previously called Straight Talk customer service about the changed terms. "There were a couple phone calls involved, and they were just very unrelenting that the only way that thing was getting unlocked is with the extra month of paid service," he said.
In its formal response to the FCC, Verizon's TracFone division asserted that it could apply the April 1, 2025, policy change to the phone that Roach bought over a month earlier. The carrier's letter to the FCC said:
We understand Mr. Roach's desire to use his device on another carrier's network, and we want to provide clarity based on our Unlocking Policy, which became effective on April 1, 2025. As outlined in our policy, for cellphones capable of remote unlocking (this includes most iPhones and some Android cellphones) that were activated with Straight Talk service prior to November 23, 2021, on any carrier network, the device becomes eligible for remote unlocking upon the customer's request after 60 days of active paid service.
Our redemption records indicate that Mr. Roach's account does not have the required minimum 60 days of active paid service based on the payment records. Therefore, the device does not currently meet the eligibility criteria for unlocking as outlined in our policy. Once the account reflects the required 60 days of active paid service, and the device meets the other conditions, he can resubmit the unlocking request.
Verizon's letter did not explain how its new policy complies with the FCC conditions or why the new policy should apply to phones purchased before the policy was in place.
Roach's complaint said the FCC should force Straight Talk to "honor the FCC-mandated 60-day post-activation unlock condition for all affected phones, without imposing the additional 'paid service' requirement." His complaint further urged the FCC to "investigate this practice as a violation of FCC rules and the merger conditions" and "take enforcement action to protect consumers' rights."
"Straight Talk's new policy conflicts with the FCC's binding conditions," Roach told the agency. "The Commission's order clearly requires unlocking after 60 days from activation, with no additional obligation to maintain service. By conditioning unlocks on two months of service, Straight Talk is effectively adding a term that Verizon did not promise and the FCC did not approve."
In his small claims court filing, Roach alleged that Verizon and Straight violated the FCC conditions and that the retroactive application of the "60 days of paid service" term, without disclosure at the point of sale, is an unfair and deceptive practice prohibited by the Kansas Consumer Protection Act.
The magistrate judge's ruling in Roach's favor said, "It does appear that defendant's change unlocking policy is contrary to the applicable FCC regulations." She noted that federal communications law does not prevent users from suing carriers individually and that the Kansas Consumer Protection Act "contains provisions prohibiting deceptive acts by a supplier which would be applicable in this case."
Roach asked for $10,000, mainly because that was the limit on damages in the venue, but the judge decided to award him damages in the amount of his actual losses. "He lost the benefit of the bargain he made with defendant such that his damages were loss of the $410.40," the ruling said.
Straight Talk's terms of service require disputes to be resolved either in arbitration or small claims court. Verizon pays the arbitration fees if users go that route. Arbitration is "a little more murky" in terms of how the parties' interests are aligned, Roach said.
"When the arbitrators are being paid by Verizon, are they really a neutral party?" he said. Roach also said he "thought it was honestly just a good opportunity for an easy win and an opportunity to learn about the small claims court system a bit. So at that point I was like, if I don't make any money from this, whatever, but at least I'll learn a little bit about the process."
Roach said he did not consult with a lawyer on his small claims case, instead opting to do it all himself. "The first time I showed up to court for the original date, they asked for proof of the returned mail summons, and I did not have that," he said.
The court hearing was rescheduled. When it was eventually held, the carrier sent a representative to argue against Roach.
"Their argument was pretty weak, I guess," Roach said. "It was basically like, 'Well, he didn't pay the two months of service, so we didn't unlock his phone. We offered him a settlement but he rejected it.'... My argument was, yeah, the terms had changed in kind of a consumer-unfriendly way. But beyond that, it was the fact that the terms had changed from something that was legal to something that was not legal with the federal regs. So regardless of the fact that the terms had changed, the current terms were illegal, which I thought was my strongest argument. And then I also put in that it was probably a violation of Kansas consumer protection law, which I'm glad I did."
Roach said that toward the end of the hearing, the judge indicated that she couldn't make a judgment based on FCC regulations and would need to rule on what the Kansas court has jurisdiction over. She issued the ruling that Verizon violated the state's consumer protection law about five or six weeks later, he said.
Given that the FCC hasn't acted on Verizon's petition to change the unlocking rules, the federal regulations "haven't changed at all in regards to Verizon's obligation to unlock devices," Roach said. He believes it would be relatively easy for consumers who were similarly harmed to beat Verizon in court or even to pursue a class action.
"I would think this would be a slam dunk for any further cases," Roach said. "I don't think I have any grounds anymore since my damages have been resolved, but it seems like it'd be a very easy class action for somebody."
= Links are in the article.