Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Friday March 08 2019, @10:23AM   Printer-friendly
from the do-you-see-what-I-see? dept.

Hipster Whines at Tech mag for Using his pic to Imply Hipsters Look the Same, Discovers pic was of an Entirely Different Hipster :

At the end of February, MIT Technology Review emitted a pithy rundown of a 34-page research paper from maths-modelling boffins at Brandeis University in the US; the paper essentially posited that in a bid to make that all-important "countercultural statement", hipsters can end up looking alike. For groovy models of how random acts by hipsters "undergo a phase transition into a synchronized state" – along with some knotty network equations – see here [PDF].

Accompanying the article was an edited stock image of a generic millennial chap in plaid shirt and standard-issue beanie, or "trendy winter attire", as Getty put it.

The MIT journal's editor-in-chief, Gideon Lichfield, took to Twitter to tell a "cautionary tale" about what followed the article going live:

"We promptly got a furious email from a man who said he was the guy in the photo that ran with the story. He accused us of slandering him, presumably by implying he was a hipster, and of using the pic without his permission. (He wasn't too complimentary about the story, either.)"

[...] Lichfield pointed out that he didn't think calling someone a hipster was "unflattering or unduly controversial" but contacted Getty to be safe.

The stock photo giant checked the model release and lo! The guy in the image wasn't even the same dude who was complaining. "He'd misidentified himself," Lichfield said.

"All of which just proves the story we ran: hipsters look so much alike that they can't even tell themselves apart from each other."

Maybe he was confused after renting this movie?


Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 5, Funny) by FatPhil on Friday March 08 2019, @10:53AM (28 children)

    by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Friday March 08 2019, @10:53AM (#811502) Homepage
    I just find this hilarious. Thank you for submitting this story.

    Why do I have prejudices and maintain stereotypes? Because they are either mostly true all the time, or actually true most of the time. (The ones that are actually true all of the time we call "facts".) It's a purely utilitarian simplification. Sure, induhviduals are all different, but I own a wide brush for a reason (even if I have replaced the handle several times, and the brush part even more times).
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 08 2019, @12:25PM (22 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 08 2019, @12:25PM (#811509)

      The problem with traditional stereotypes is similar to that of (the lack of) privacy.

      Even if in (not so) ancient times both worked well enough to understand what could kill you before was too late and everybody knew the whereabouts of everyother neigbour around the geographically limited environment of the town's tribe, now neither translate well to an unforgetting instantaneous global world.

      • (Score: 5, Insightful) by The Mighty Buzzard on Friday March 08 2019, @12:53PM (20 children)

        Entirely untrue. Stereotypes are just as useful as they ever were. The problem some people have is in realizing they were never meant to be universal truths, just quick and dirty assumptions that you need to keep an eye on in case they don't apply this time.

        --
        My rights don't end where your fear begins.
        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 08 2019, @06:22PM (1 child)

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 08 2019, @06:22PM (#811640)

          The problem [...] people have is in realizing they were never meant to be universal truths

          Not-so-entirely untrue then.

          • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Friday March 08 2019, @08:35PM

            That's their error, not an error in the stereotype. Much like you shouldn't have to put a "for external use only" sticker on a tractor, you should not have to explain that a stereotype is neither a fine-grained tool nor an infinitely wide brush to paint people with.

            --
            My rights don't end where your fear begins.
        • (Score: 3, Informative) by DeathMonkey on Friday March 08 2019, @07:00PM (9 children)

          by DeathMonkey (1380) on Friday March 08 2019, @07:00PM (#811662) Journal

          Stereotypes are just as useful as they ever were.

          Sure, when you are using them on others.

          But when people stereotype you as a racist, you don't like it very much.

          • (Score: 3, Interesting) by The Mighty Buzzard on Friday March 08 2019, @08:22PM (8 children)

            That would be them failing to use them properly, yes. They're not meant for accusing individuals with. They're stating something that's true often enough that you need to be aware of it.

            --
            My rights don't end where your fear begins.
            • (Score: 3, Funny) by aristarchus on Friday March 08 2019, @09:17PM (7 children)

              by aristarchus (2645) on Friday March 08 2019, @09:17PM (#811744) Journal

              Yes, but while TMB's point that the stereotype that all TMBs are racist is onyl mostly true, and the mistake is to take it as a universal truth which would justify in knowing that TMB is racist, when the inductive nature of stereotype formation only makes it likely that the TMB is actually racist, it is still true that TMB is probably racist. Quite the feat for a Tribal Member.

              Now the point is that a stereotype can itself be wrong, even as a matter of probability, particularly when it is the result of racist presumptions. So we must be careful with claiming that they are useful and that we only need to be on the lookout for the exception that proves the rule. We need a proper categorical syllogism.

              For example, someone might aver, "All conservatives are stupid". This is an over-generalization, even though it contains a certain truth. John Stuart Mill famously [wikiquote.org] corrected the inference: "While it is not true that all conservatives are stupid, it is true that all stupid people are conservative".

              So, not all racists are TMB, but all TMB's are racist. Stereotype seems legit, based on posting history.

              • (Score: 3, Funny) by The Mighty Buzzard on Friday March 08 2019, @11:15PM (6 children)

                I'm not racist anymore. I haven't watched a single one since Dale Earnhardt died.

                --
                My rights don't end where your fear begins.
                • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 09 2019, @03:05AM (5 children)

                  by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 09 2019, @03:05AM (#811904)

                  One weird way to submit a QED.

                  Not that I'm saying ALL Nasscar enthusiasts are racist, but stereotypically they all are.

                  • (Score: 3, Informative) by The Mighty Buzzard on Saturday March 09 2019, @02:52PM (2 children)

                    by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Saturday March 09 2019, @02:52PM (#812021) Homepage Journal

                    No, they all are. Race-ist. And quit trying to make a perfectly good dumb joke boring by taking it seriously.

                    --
                    My rights don't end where your fear begins.
                    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 10 2019, @07:01PM (1 child)

                      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 10 2019, @07:01PM (#812379)

                      Deflect all you want, my comment was obviously a play on your stupid axiom and I was throwing it in your face to see how you like it. Buncha sensitive little kiddos that like to dish it out but can't take the heat themselves.

                      Ah well, not surprising in the slightest.

                  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 09 2019, @06:30PM (1 child)

                    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 09 2019, @06:30PM (#812087)

                    So my black friend who has lived his whole life in the city of Detroit, and had the dream of being a NASCAR driver when he was young is a racist?

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 08 2019, @07:50PM (7 children)

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 08 2019, @07:50PM (#811685)

          Please, enlighten us as to how stereotypes have ever been useful? Also, how are you able to tell when the stereotype is based on statistically likely traits or when it is simply bigoted bullshit?

          • (Score: 4, Touché) by DeathMonkey on Friday March 08 2019, @08:15PM (1 child)

            by DeathMonkey (1380) on Friday March 08 2019, @08:15PM (#811700) Journal

            The conservative rule of stereotypes:

            Stereotypes I use on others, totally fine.
            Stereotypes used ON me, the root of all evil and you're a virtue signalling SJW.

          • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Friday March 08 2019, @08:31PM (4 children)

            Okay, I will then. Let's go with "Black people are violent criminals" for this example. It's not true of all black people or even a majority of black people but it's true enough that it will drastically increase your life expectancy if it keeps your lilly-white ass from walking around ghettos. That's been a useful inaccuracy for white folks or anyone who looks like they might have money and be unarmed for as long as I've been around.

            It doesn't mean you assume all black folks are the stereotype but being aware of the stereotype and why it exists could keep you from making a very foolish decision.

            --
            My rights don't end where your fear begins.
            • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 08 2019, @11:47PM (1 child)

              by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 08 2019, @11:47PM (#811819)

              Found the racist! Oh, by the way, you ought not drive across Oklahoma after dark. Just saying.

            • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 09 2019, @03:14AM (1 child)

              by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 09 2019, @03:14AM (#811909)

              But you can say the exact same thing about any neighborhood with a criminal element. Thus you are a racist, probably diet racist but still.

              • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Saturday March 09 2019, @02:56PM

                by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Saturday March 09 2019, @02:56PM (#812023) Homepage Journal

                Yes, you can. Unfortunately poor black neighborhoods, despite much lower police presence, still have far more violent crimes committed in them. So the stereotype is still useful even between two poor neighborhoods that only differ in predominant skin color.

                --
                My rights don't end where your fear begins.
      • (Score: 3, Insightful) by FatPhil on Friday March 08 2019, @01:00PM

        by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Friday March 08 2019, @01:00PM (#811515) Homepage
        As long as you understand that you're using a simplification, then I don't see a problem with that; it's a very useful pragmatic tool that gets you most of the way. The ones that give stereotypes a bad reputation tend to be the ones who hold false, perhaps once-true-but-now-outdated, opinions to not be just a simplification but an actual truth.

        Oh - the earth is flat. Or it may as well be for >99% of people >99% of the time. (Oh, I watched /Behind the Curve/ over the weekend, it was a somewhat toothless puppydog of a documentary, but still interesting because of the subject matter).
        --
        Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 08 2019, @04:18PM (2 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 08 2019, @04:18PM (#811574)

      I alway try to imply human sanity. That's why I choose to assume that the guy was making a practical joke, sometimes called trolling.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 08 2019, @10:17PM (1 child)

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 08 2019, @10:17PM (#811782)

        That asumption is your mistake!

        Only consider that the average IQ is 100 and realize how dumb most of those average humans you stumble upon everyday are.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 09 2019, @12:29AM

          by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 09 2019, @12:29AM (#811836)

          IQ is a score for solving the puzzles of an IQ test. It is obvious that someone highly trained in solving puzzles will score much higher, therefore the score can not be a static measurement. I'm pretty good at seeing connections and patterns, but if you stop at the first pattern.. then that's all you see. I never question the wisdom of the crowd [wikipedia.org], but I often question the question.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 08 2019, @05:53PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 08 2019, @05:53PM (#811626)

      The definition of hipster is somebody who looks exactly like $x. So, all hipsters look exactly like $x. If they did not look like $x, they would not be a hipster. QED

    • (Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Friday March 08 2019, @07:05PM

      by DeathMonkey (1380) on Friday March 08 2019, @07:05PM (#811665) Journal

      Conservatives are fascists
      Republicans are racists
      Men are misogynists

      Life if going to be so much easier now!

  • (Score: 2) by pkrasimirov on Friday March 08 2019, @11:13AM (1 child)

    by pkrasimirov (3358) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 08 2019, @11:13AM (#811506)

    Best title on this site since a long time. Thank you :)

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 09 2019, @12:27AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 09 2019, @12:27AM (#811835)

      Agreed, it's a fine art few get so right.

  • (Score: 4, Funny) by number6x on Friday March 08 2019, @03:32PM (2 children)

    by number6x (903) on Friday March 08 2019, @03:32PM (#811549)

    Old woman: "Why do you have tattoos?"

    Hipster: "Tattoos are a personal expression. My tattoos make me unique."

    Old woman: "But all of your friends have tattoos too."

    Hipster: "Yes. I'm unique, just like everyone else."

    Obligatory xkcd: https://xkcd.com/933/ [xkcd.com]

    • (Score: 3, Interesting) by urza9814 on Friday March 08 2019, @04:24PM (1 child)

      by urza9814 (3954) on Friday March 08 2019, @04:24PM (#811579) Journal

      Yeah, but do they have *the same* tattoos?

      I'm sure there are some people who go to the tattoo parlor and pick some random symbol that they think looks cool; but every person I've ever met with tattoos could give you a rather lengthy story to explain every single one of them, and occasionally they're even designs that the person has drawn themselves.

      Shit, we've all got a face too, I guess we must be clones...

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 09 2019, @01:28AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 09 2019, @01:28AM (#811855)

        The most meaningful tattoos come from Auschwitz. You don't get to pick anything about the tattoo, it is unique, and you get a lengthy story to go with it.

        Drawing them yourself is how you end up like Charles Manson.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 08 2019, @03:58PM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 08 2019, @03:58PM (#811565)

    Where grifters feign their aggrievance, together with an army of useful idiot followers, in grandstanding Twittergasms for attention and free shit sent as apology.

    This guy used email. Maybe he couldn't risk his twitter account and its followership getting discredited over this?
    Would have been fun if more than one person had complained.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 08 2019, @04:34PM (2 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 08 2019, @04:34PM (#811585)

      Or as another story pointed out it was simply a very close doppleganger. I have had a few onstances where people thought I was someone else, and we've all seen the "other nationality version of famous person."

      Is this story amusing? Yes. Does it justify your little hate-fest? No.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 08 2019, @08:14PM (1 child)

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 08 2019, @08:14PM (#811698)

        Link to that "other story"?

        Quote from this story:

        The stock photo giant checked the model release and lo! The guy in the image wasn't even the same dude who was complaining. "He'd misidentified himself," Lichfield said.

        This article indicates nothing about there existing some sort of resemblance between the two hipsters.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 09 2019, @03:17AM

          by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 09 2019, @03:17AM (#811910)

          Saw it on Reddit :/ but c'mon, even without being a perfect doppleganger it would be pretty common to mistake hipsters. Such individuality, much wow.

(1)