Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by takyon on Wednesday June 12 2019, @12:47PM   Printer-friendly

Watch Live as SpaceX Delivers Trio of Satellites to Space:

SpaceX will launch a Falcon 9 rocket from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California, containing the Canadian Space Agency's Radarsat trio of Earth observation satellites on Wednesday. The broadcast will be telecast live on SpaceX's YouTube channel. If you're keen to follow along, we have all the details you need right here.

Canada's three Radarsat satellites, shaped like old rubber stamps, will gather data about the nations coasts and waterways to help ships navigate the Arctic, provide agriculture solutions and help first responders save lives, according to the agency. The dimensions of the satellites are such that they're almost as big as a Tesla Roadster, but they're only half as heavy. Eventually the satellites will settle into an orbit around 600 kilometers (around 370 miles) above the Earth.

[...] The launch window opens on Wednesday, June 12 at 7:17 a.m. PT[*] and closes 13 minutes later, at 7:30 a.m. PT. Like most launches, a backup window will open 24 hours later, on June 13, should something go awry during the first launch window. The satellites will deploy at 54 minutes into the flight.

takyon: The rocket will carry one of the most expensive payloads that SpaceX has ever attempted to launch. At more than $1 billion, the Radarsat satellites will cost more than 4 years of the Canadian Space Agency's approximately $250 million annual budget.

*Launch is scheduled for 1417-1430 GMT (10:17-10:30 a.m. EDT; 7:17-7:30 a.m. PDT). See it on YouTube.

Also at NASASpaceFlight.

See also: First Falcon Heavy night launch slips to June 24


Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 4, Informative) by progo on Wednesday June 12 2019, @02:03PM

    by progo (6356) on Wednesday June 12 2019, @02:03PM (#854654) Homepage
  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Wednesday June 12 2019, @02:26PM

    by takyon (881) <reversethis-{gro ... s} {ta} {noykat}> on Wednesday June 12 2019, @02:26PM (#854657) Journal

    Good footage and there's sure to be some great photos of the rocket exiting and entering the thick fog.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
  • (Score: 2) by ElizabethGreene on Wednesday June 12 2019, @04:27PM (4 children)

    by ElizabethGreene (6748) on Wednesday June 12 2019, @04:27PM (#854702) Journal

    The best part was the pre-launch shot of the launchpad, completely greywashed in fog. The presenter resorted to a model of the rocket instead. :)

    • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Wednesday June 12 2019, @04:41PM (3 children)

      by bob_super (1357) on Wednesday June 12 2019, @04:41PM (#854706)

      "How was the day at the office, dear?"
      "Nominal, boring. Launched a rocket we couldn't see through thick fog, with a Billion dollars of uninsured sats on top. ten minutes later, the 20-story-tall first stage just came back and landed vertically dead center on a pad you couldn't see if you stood on it."
      "Oh. I knew you'd need something exciting, so i broke the whatchamacallit on the left side in the garage. Do you think you can fix it?"
      "Thank you darling, you know me so well ! "

      • (Score: 2) by choose another one on Wednesday June 12 2019, @09:29PM (2 children)

        by choose another one (515) on Wednesday June 12 2019, @09:29PM (#854851)

        "How was the day at the office, dear?"
        "Nominal, boring"

        And that's just it, SpaceX / Musk had such promise in the beginning, Musk was a maverick, a back-of-an-envelope engineer, but doing rocket science. Phrases like "fail fast, fail often", "rapid unscheduled disassembly", while doing rocket science. With everything live-streamed to us from multiple cameras. Musk was like Tony Stark, but real, you never knew when he was going to crash through the roof, or destroy his car collection, or if he would even make it to the end - since it was real life and not a movie (and yeah I know that doesn't work since the last movie but...). This was going to be incredible entertainment, full of spectacular screw-ups and lots of explosions. This was "honey, order me a crate of popcorn and maybe a new comfy chair, I may be some time...".

        But now it's all gone wrong. It's like watching Formula 1 - theoretically some of the best cars, best tracks, best drivers, where tenths of a second matter a lot, but in reality you don't watch it live, just glance at the news the next day to check that Hamilton won and see that there was an interesting anomaly on turn 3 of lap 54 where he nearly locked up the rears.

        In fact, it's less interesting than formula 1, or even cricket - you can keep those on in the background and just switch to the video and rewind a bit when there's a shout, don't even get that with SpaceX these days. "We landed the rocket but the boat rocked a bit in the waves on the way back and it fell over" is about the level of excitement, days later.

        In hindsight, I've realised that NASA knew what was needed and every time the shuttle started to get boring like this, they blew one up - hey, it's rocket science, can we have another few billion and another seven astronauts please...

        I love Elon and SpaceX because it's given me hope again that maybe in my lifetime we'll see humans walk on other worlds, but also I ****ing hate him, because he's made rocket science boring, reduced us to watching vintage blooper reels for entertainment.

        • (Score: 3, Touché) by pe1rxq on Wednesday June 12 2019, @10:29PM (1 child)

          by pe1rxq (844) on Wednesday June 12 2019, @10:29PM (#854877) Homepage

          Did you miss them blowing up a Dragon 2 just two months ago? They did it especially for you....

          • (Score: 2) by choose another one on Thursday June 13 2019, @08:10AM

            by choose another one (515) on Thursday June 13 2019, @08:10AM (#855042)

            I missed the multiple cam feed high quality youtube streams of it, all I can find is a crappy vertical video which looks like a mobile phone recording a monitor, can't see much, hardly popcorn material.

  • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 12 2019, @05:08PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 12 2019, @05:08PM (#854717)

    Low Earth orbit where even jew satellites have been, spying on us all.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 12 2019, @08:58PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 12 2019, @08:58PM (#854833)

    I sure hope I wasn't the only one that read that as:
    Watch Live SeX

    and then had to do a double take to read the title correctly.

  • (Score: 2) by corey on Thursday June 13 2019, @02:36AM (1 child)

    by corey (2202) on Thursday June 13 2019, @02:36AM (#854971)

    Why? Is there anything special about the launch, rockets or anything?

    • (Score: 2) by takyon on Thursday June 13 2019, @03:36AM

      by takyon (881) <reversethis-{gro ... s} {ta} {noykat}> on Thursday June 13 2019, @03:36AM (#854995) Journal

      It was apparently SpaceX's most expensive (known) payload launched. There may have been a more expensive payload launched for the U.S. government. Canada was antsy about the F9 used, wanting a new or "gently" used booster.

      Once the three RCM satellites were effectively complete, a series of unfortunate circumstances combined to delay the constellation’s launch almost indefinitely. The first domino fell in December 2018, when Falcon 9 Block 5 booster B1050 – having successfully supported Cargo Dragon’s CRS-16 launch – suffered a failure that prevented a successful landing. Incredibly, the booster did survive its accidental Atlantic Ocean landing and is now sitting in a SpaceX hangar, but B1050 is unlikely to ever fly again.

      This posed a problem for Maxar and the Canadian Space Agency (CSA), who seem to have contractually requested that RCM launch on either a new or very gently flight-proven Falcon 9 booster. The problem: SpaceX had none of either option available for RCM after B1050’s unplanned swim and needed to balance the needs of several other important customers. Several Block 5 boosters were technically available but all had two or even three previous launches under their belts.

      Meanwhile, SpaceX’s booster production had been almost entirely focused (and would remain so months after) on building four new Falcon Heavy boosters and the first expendable Falcon 9 Block 5 booster, reserved for the US Air Force and a long-delayed customer. Since those five boosters were completed and shipped out, just one additional booster (B1056) has been finished, launching Cargo Dragon’s CRS-17 mission just one month ago.

      In short, had Maxar/CSA waited for a new booster, RCM’s launch would likely be delayed at least another 30-60 days beyond its current target of June 11th. Instead, they downselected to Falcon 9 B1051, then in the midst of several months of prelaunch preparations for Crew Dragon’s launch debut (DM-1). DM-1 went off without a hitch in early March, after which the gently-used B1051 underwent a brisk ~45 days of inspection and refurbishment before heading west to SpaceX’s VAFB launch pad.

      As noted, the cost was equivalent to 4+ years of Canada's space program funding. Looks like everything went just fine, but if it had exploded on the pad, it would have been a huge setback for everyone.

      --
      [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(1)