Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 19 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Friday November 12 2021, @03:53AM   Printer-friendly

Seagate Demonstrates HDD with PCIe NVMe Interface

Seagate has demonstrated the industry's first hard disk drive connected to a host using a PCIe interface at the Open Compute Project Summit. Like solid-state drives, the experimental hard drive uses the NVMe protocol to operate alongside SSDs seamlessly. Usage of a single protocol for different types of storage devices will greatly simplify datacenters.

The experimental [HDD] is based on Seagate's proprietary controller that supports all three major protocols, including SAS, SATA, and NVMe over a 'native NVMe port,' and does not require any bridges.

[...] Modern HDDs can barely saturate even a single PCIe 2.0 link, but future multi-actuator HDDs promise to be much faster, so 6 Gbps provided by SATA or 12 Gbps offered by SAS might not be enough at some point. To that end, the industry has to think about future interfaces to connect hard drives, and PCIe seems like a natural choice. Furthermore, as SSDs are gaining traction in datacenters, the NVMe protocol becomes pervasive, so it makes sense to adopt it for HDDs. This is why NVMe 2.0 adds hard drive support.

NVM Express aka Non-Volatile Memory Host Controller Interface Specification.

Also at Phoronix.


Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 2) by Mojibake Tengu on Friday November 12 2021, @04:51AM (1 child)

    by Mojibake Tengu (8598) on Friday November 12 2021, @04:51AM (#1195562) Journal

    I need RAM on NVMe too. 64T would be enough, for a while.

    I could make a good use of this for a serious process long term memory without retention. Meanwhile, just waiting until gaming industry reinvents this concept for some other sinister purpose, like VR games.

    --
    Rust programming language offends both my Intelligence and my Spirit.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 12 2021, @04:56AM (8 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 12 2021, @04:56AM (#1195563)

    What good is HDD on NVMe interface? It's like tape drive on the same interface as SSD.

    I suppose it simplifies hardware design a bit, but that's about it.

    • (Score: 3, Informative) by takyon on Friday November 12 2021, @05:50AM (7 children)

      by takyon (881) <reversethis-{gro ... s} {ta} {noykat}> on Friday November 12 2021, @05:50AM (#1195568) Journal

      It's seemingly to get everything on NVMe, but the multi-actuator technology could actually increase sequential speeds to faster than at least SATA.

      The fastest single-actuator drives seem to be around 260 MB/s max (e.g. Seagate IronWolf Pro 18 TB). The Seagate Exos 2X14 has two actuators for up to 524 MB/s.

      https://www.extremetech.com/computing/323072-seagate-specs-the-mach-2-the-worlds-fastest-hard-drive [extremetech.com]

      SAS 12Gb/s was used over SATA for several reasons. The first-generation Mach.2 drive is expected to nearly saturate the SATA bus, which makes SAS 12Gb/s a better option for the long term. The two actuators are fully independent and Seagate claims the measured, real-world performance improvement of a dual actuator is consistently in the 1.85x – 2x range. Mach.2 drives can even be RAIDed internally, though Seagate cautions against relying on one drive for redundancy, given that dual actuators don’t mean the entire physical drive is duplicated/protected.

      --
      [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
      • (Score: 2) by RedGreen on Friday November 12 2021, @08:23AM (6 children)

        by RedGreen (888) on Friday November 12 2021, @08:23AM (#1195588)

        "Seagate cautions against relying on one drive for redundancy, given that dual actuators don’t mean the entire physical drive is duplicated/protected."

        I would question relying on anything they made. Only drives I had to upgrade the firmware on to prevent them bricking themselves randomly on boot. Then everyone of the damn things died anyways conveniently just out of warranty oh now I think about one in warranty that died later all the other 9 or so dead with no replacement. Never have bought another of theirs since. I have had the odd western digital die but not the whole lot of them dead like their garbage.

        --
        Those people are not attacking Tesla dealerships. They are tourists showing love. I learned that on Jan. 6, 2021.
        • (Score: 3, Insightful) by takyon on Friday November 12 2021, @09:18AM (3 children)

          by takyon (881) <reversethis-{gro ... s} {ta} {noykat}> on Friday November 12 2021, @09:18AM (#1195594) Journal

          Anecdata. How many millions of these things are they selling each year?

          These multi-actuator drives probably aren't going to normal people though, and should be of a higher quality.

          Also, anything that Seagate does will inevitably be copied by Western Digital, and vice versa.

          Western Digital to Demo Dual-Actuator HDDs Next Week: Double the Actuators for Double the Perf [anandtech.com] (2019)

          --
          [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
          • (Score: 2) by Reziac on Saturday November 13 2021, @02:15AM (2 children)

            by Reziac (2489) on Saturday November 13 2021, @02:15AM (#1195827) Homepage

            Here ya go, data-data.

            https://www.backblaze.com/blog/backblaze-drive-stats-for-q3-2021/ [backblaze.com]

            They have stats going back several years, but the results are usually about the same -- Seagates have the highest fail rate.

            --
            And there is no Alkibiades to come back and save us from ourselves.
            • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 13 2021, @06:36PM (1 child)

              by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 13 2021, @06:36PM (#1195966)

              WDC had high failure rates too: https://www.backblaze.com/blog/hard-drive-reliability-stats-q1-2016/ [backblaze.com]

              For some reason Backblaze stopped using WD drives for a few years: https://www.backblaze.com/blog/hard-drive-stats-for-2019/ [backblaze.com]

              I haven't had good experiences with WDC from that era either.

              • (Score: 2) by toddestan on Sunday November 14 2021, @01:10AM

                by toddestan (4982) on Sunday November 14 2021, @01:10AM (#1196004)

                Backblaze does whatever is cheaper for them. They will purchase drives that are less reliable or they suspect might be less reliable if they are cheaper, and the money they save is more than the cost of dealing with a higher failure rate in their data centers. Seagate is often the cheapest, so Backblaze will still buy them.

                For personal use, random drive failures are annoying so it's worth the extra money to buy something that's not Seagate.

        • (Score: 2) by Spamalope on Saturday November 13 2021, @01:09AM (1 child)

          by Spamalope (5233) on Saturday November 13 2021, @01:09AM (#1195814) Homepage

          We had an array of drives fail, from several brands.
          In one case, we heard a pallet of drives had been dropped. The drives appeared to be ok at first, but had a huge failure rate about a year out.
          So the question is, is that model terrible with widespread problems or did you have an isolated problem (and a manufacturer not standing behind the product)?

          • (Score: 2) by RedGreen on Saturday November 13 2021, @01:55AM

            by RedGreen (888) on Saturday November 13 2021, @01:55AM (#1195826)

            "So the question is, is that model terrible with widespread problems or did you have an isolated problem (and a manufacturer not standing behind the product)?"

            Only the single model total garbage, I still have three of the drives that replaced them drives going 10+ years later. The others were sold off after upgrading to larger models which have since been upgraded to larger models two or three years ago. Out of them dozen or two only a couple have failed both still under warranty if my memory is correct. Them Seagate drives as I said only one in warranty the rest just out of it. As long as I live they will never get another cent of my money.

            --
            Those people are not attacking Tesla dealerships. They are tourists showing love. I learned that on Jan. 6, 2021.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Runaway1956 on Friday November 12 2021, @06:32AM (4 children)

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Friday November 12 2021, @06:32AM (#1195573) Journal

    Read the article, you get the impression they are using spinning rust, or traditional platter drives. Get into the article, you'll see

    The experimental SSD is based on Seagate's proprietary controller that supports all three major protocols,

    So, is this drive a traditional platter drive, and SSD, or some kind of hybrid with a proprietary connector?

    Let's be clear: There are already NVME "drives" with PCIe interfaces. There are SATA and USB drives with PCIe interfaces. I'm not aware of any spinning disk drives with PCIe interfaces - the concept seems counter intuitive. No existing spinning platter can make full use of PCIe.

    Modern HDDs can barely saturate even a single PCIe 2.0 link, but future multi-actuator HDDs promise to be much faster, so 6 Gbps provided by SATA or 12 Gbps offered by SAS might not be enough at some point.

    And, you'll still be spinning platters. I simply can't imagine that the platters will ever equal the various memory chips already out there, with or without an acuator.

    --
    “I have become friends with many school shooters” - Tampon Tim Walz
    • (Score: 4, Informative) by takyon on Friday November 12 2021, @06:41AM (1 child)

      by takyon (881) <reversethis-{gro ... s} {ta} {noykat}> on Friday November 12 2021, @06:41AM (#1195576) Journal

      So, is this drive a traditional platter drive, and SSD, or some kind of hybrid with a proprietary connector?

      It's an HDD. I replaced the typo just now.

      I simply can't imagine that the platters will ever equal the various memory chips already out there, with or without an acuator.

      They already got a 2-actuator 14 TB drive to 524 MB/s. Increase the capacity to the 30-100 TB range that is expected with heat/microwave-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR/MAMR), and double the actuators to 4, and 12 Gb/s SAS would not be enough.

      Obviously, the point is not to equal SSDs. Those can reach absurd speeds like 26,000 MB/s [wccftech.com] or a lot more as NAND density increases in the coming years.

      --
      [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    • (Score: 2) by Spamalope on Saturday November 13 2021, @01:05AM (1 child)

      by Spamalope (5233) on Saturday November 13 2021, @01:05AM (#1195812) Homepage

      This allows a single interface for tiered storage (ram/ssd/HD array in the same storage enclosure).
      I think in addition to performance, they want a single interface to simplify design and supply chain. (but also to keep an array of drives from hitting limits with SAS)
      Then too, with SSD+ram on drive cache maybe there is a bit of single drive performance gain.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 15 2021, @09:33AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 15 2021, @09:33AM (#1196312)

        There are also other benefits beside performance and having a single interface because NVMe was able to take advantage of technological and design improvements because they didn't have to deal with as much backwards compatibility or other restrictions brought by older buses/interfaces.

(1)