SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the at-least-women-will-live-on-venus dept.
When astronauts first began flying in space, NASA worried about "space madness," a mental malady they thought might arise from humans experiencing microgravity and claustrophobic isolation inside of a cramped spacecraft high above the Earth. Now Megan Garber writes in The Atlantic that NASA is hoping to find out what life on Mars does to the human emotional state by putting three men and three women in a 1,000-square-foot habitat shaped like a dome for four months. The volunteers in the second HI-SEAS mission a purposely tiny group selected out of a group of 700 applicants include, among others, a neuropsychologist, an aerospace engineer, and an Air Force veteran who is studying human factors in aviation. "We're going to stress them," says Kim Binsted, the project's principal investigator. "That's the nature of the study."
That test involves isolating the crew in the same way they'd be isolated on Mars. The only communication they'll be allowed with the outside world-that is to say, with their family and friends-will be conducted through email. (And that will be given an artificial delay of 20 minutes to simulate the lag involved in Mars-to-Earth communications.) If that doesn't seem too stressful, here's another source of stress: Each mission member will get only eight minutes of shower time ... per week. The stress will be compounded by the fact that the only time the crew will be able to leave their habitat-yurt is when they're wearing puffy, insulated uniforms that simulate space suits in the Hawaiian heat. Throughout the mission, researchers will be testing the subjects' moods and the changes they exhibit in their relationships with each other. They'll also be examining the crew members' cognitive skills, seeing whether-and how-they change as the experiment wears on. Binsted says the mission has gotten the attention of the TV world, but don't expect to see much inside-the-dome footage. "You wouldn't believe the number of producers who called us," says Binsted. "Fortunately, we're not ethically allowed to subject our crew to that kind of thing."
(Score: 3, Insightful) by bucc5062 on Friday April 04 2014, @07:19PM
In any of these studies I feel they remove one rather important factor out, these people are still on Earth and any study being done on Earth will not let them die, kill each other or go crazy. Right there you remove a key stressor with is a basic survival feeling. Halfway between Earth and Mars, or sitting on Mars will be a whole different feel then being on Earth. Lack of gravity vs Gravity, hostile atmosphere (or lack there of) vs friendly if the dome breaks and on and on.
I cannot imagine what a constant feeling of stress is like, but I would figure being on Mars will be a whole different way of being then experimenting on Earth. Showers once a week, lag in communications...please. Knowing that if you fuck up once, you may die and living that for over a year? That is stress.
Screw this Earth Bio-dome crap, just ask for volunteers and send em up. Can't find any, whack em over the head with a belaying pin and put em on board. My goodness have we become that wussified as a species in the past couple of hundred years? /half kidding
The more things change, the more they look the same
(Score: 5, Insightful) by mhajicek on Friday April 04 2014, @09:40PM
Study submarine crews.
The spacelike surfaces of time foliations can have a cusp at the surface of discontinuity. - P. Hajicek
(Score: 3, Insightful) by bucc5062 on Friday April 04 2014, @11:26PM
With respect there are some differences:
1 - The relatively short time frame underwater (6 months is not years)
2 - Larger population allows for more diversity in contact and communication
3 - Military structure and disipline vs a more civilian science/proto-military community
4 - Being on Earth.
I don't think we can fathom (these days) what it means to be in close proximity to our home planet. Ars Technica had an article on how a shuttle crew could be saved if tiles were too damaged. Subs have escape pods and hatches to provide the semblance of safety and the almost unconscious tholught that rescue is possible.
When people go to Mars, there will be no rescue, no escape pod when the shit hit the fan. Subs come close, but nothing well ever tell us how we do until we just do it. Kind of like the first explorers that crossed the Atlantic (or Pacific). How many did not ever make it back? How much did that matter compared to the riches in discovering new places. As a species, we have grow soft. On a planet where we have 7 billion people we feel life is so precious we don't even allow people to try, compared to a time when live was precious, and we went anyway.
We have crawled back to the caves, we have climbed back into the trees.
The more things change, the more they look the same
(Score: 3, Interesting) by rts008 on Friday April 04 2014, @09:42PM
LOL!
I wonder how many people even know what a belaying pin is nowadays?
I would say yes from my observations of events here(USA) since '9/11'.
The closest we have came to facing hardship and threats to our survival(real or imagined) since Japan bombed Pearl Harbor, was the Cold War, until '9/11.
We became complacent and soft not having to face much physical adversity that threatens our survival as a society/nation. Modern life has become much safer and easier overall, and we get 'out of shape' and 'out of practice' not having to fight so hard to survive. It happens everywhere, and seems to be a natural trait(or at least common) of our species.
Similar to an athlete, if you just sit back and relax, you get 'out of shape' and 'out of practice'.
And that just reinforces your point about the study being safe will affect the behavior of the participants.
There is no 'real threat' to their survival, and that will make a huge difference.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 05 2014, @12:54AM
belaying pin
You, sir, are a sociopath.
(Score:3, Insightful)
Apparently, there are others of your aberrant ilk.
wussified
I would say yes
Your lack of empathy for your fellow human has me wondering about you as well.
My reaction to the GP was significantly different.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights [wikipedia.org]
Welcome to the 21st Century. Make an effort to fit in.
-- gewg_
(Score: 2) by bucc5062 on Sunday April 06 2014, @12:46PM
Actually, I am not. I do read and have an imagination and use it from time to time.
If you remember your history, sailing ships were, at times, manned in such a manner. It was not right, but it happened. I was injecting humor figuring people would understand that using a belaying pin is not the proper approach. These days I figure a corporation my just take all your money and give you a choice of lifetime poverty, death, or travel into space as an "Explorer".
As Gishzida pointed out, we need to have a frontier and like any/all frontiers, it is not a safe place to be, but one that certain kind of people may want to experience. We need to explore or we will implode. If you ever read any of my other posts or ever bothered to ask you'd find I am very empathic to my fellow humans. I am saddened by the true sociopaths that are tearing down civilization either through violence, economics, or education. To comment on your post, they truly violate the Declaration of human rights whilst I was merely joking about a very old reference to forced travel.
Right now, today if volunteers/workers/thrill seekers were asked to go and explore Mars, the solar system, to build refineries and ways to mine resources the line would stretch around the world. We don't need the elite doing things, we need people doing things. SO stop being so knee jerk in a response and try to read in the context of the voice and topic. Its less stressful and less mean that way.
And I am doing okay, since you were wondering. A little stressed over some life decisions, want to buy a farm? Thanks for the invite, but I've been here a while.
The more things change, the more they look the same
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 09 2014, @07:54AM
sailing ships were, at times
Sailing ships haven't been a thing for over 150 years.
In that time frame, it was also acceptable to own slaves and to beat them to death.
It's time to move ahead.
I was injecting humor figuring people would understand
There's this thing... [google.com]
It's been around since 1982.
-- gewg_
(Score: 2) by bucc5062 on Wednesday April 09 2014, @10:16AM
Oh come on, I looked back and even in my first post I mentioned I was kidding. If I had put a smiley face after that you'd think I was crazy and a sociopath so really, no matter what I did, I lose.
You seem to take everything so literal. That has to be exhausting or an emotional roller coaster. I am starting to think you are a some bot or ALICE type of program. Lack of humor, literal understanding, short responses; it starts to make sense. You also post as AC so to remain hidden.
Interesting.
The more things change, the more they look the same
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 11 2014, @06:54PM
You seem to take everything so literal
Literally (It's an adverb.)
Yes, the written word is something that I take seriously.
You also post as AC
Remaining AC reflects my disnterest in karma.
You also couldn't say that with any certainty...
so to remain hidden
...if I didn't SIGN each and every post that I make.
-- gewg_
(Score: 2, Interesting) by gishzida on Saturday April 05 2014, @12:04PM
I think you may be correct... We can't have a real "wagon train to the stars"-- After all *that* does not have all of the pork barrel and kickbacks of a "federally funded study". I fully expect something like "(in)voluntary" colonization of the moon will be something the PRC will consider in 30 to 50 years... that is if they don't implode first and take a lot of us with them.
The truth is we NEED frontiers and have needed frontiers for over fifty years... What do we get instead? Wars and Circuses. We need some place where we can send the rift-raft, the bad men, *and* the risk takers... so they are kept so busy staying alive they have no time to harm, hinder, or victimize those left behind. It's how the American west was "opened" [after of course stealing the land].
OTOH I can see that some of the other posters in this thread seem to be enamored with the idea that colonizing Mars or other real estate should be reserved for the "elite" pre-selection process sponsored by Governments everywhere. These posters seem to believe that this is about "science" and not species survival. There is no point in a man or woman going to Mars to "do Science". It can be done quite well by robot probes and landers and be a lot cheaper in the terms of money expended.
The only reason to go to Mars or the Moon is to get us off Earth and out from under the weight of our own civilization... to get us more real estate so we have a longer term chance of survival as a species. If we go there with no intention of staying then there is no point in going in the first place. Where are all the Libertarian types who usually are calling foul at government interference?
The old west was opened not by "pre-selection" of Government sponsored colonist or "scientists" but by "self selection" of people that wanted to be be free or to "get somewhere" economically by "going somewhere".
Most of Australia was opened by convicts that had been transported for criminal offenses-- their national anthem is about a sheep thief!
If you want a no risk way to colonize the solar system then send the convicts, politically undesirable, the volunteers, or the involuntary volunteers on a one way. Heinlein's The Moon is a Harsh Mistress speaks to the "reality of what it might be like.
OTOH the way the US Government is going about this we will never colonize the Moon or Mars... PRC, India, the EU or Brazil will get there first. I don't include Russia in the list because they, like the USA, have a political elite that is only interested in lining its own pockets.
Oh, then there are those who will ask "What right have we to mess up another planet?" and the only conclusion I can draw from those folks is they are more concerned with the ecology of a dead rock in the sky than the future of their children's children many times removed.
Humanity needs frontiers.